World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3167 2911 1530 1384 122 9045

Louise A. Rohrbach publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Louise A. Rohrbach between 1987 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Louise A. Rohrbach published across 34 years, from 1987 to 2020, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2010. 3 of the 122 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2010. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication
1987 2020

122 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Louise A. Rohrbach: publications per year, 1987 to 2020
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 4
2001 5
2002 6
2003 7
2004 7
2005 4
2006 5
2007 4
2008 3
2009 7
2010 11
2011 3
2012 6
2013 8
2014 6
2015 9
2016 7
2017 4
2018 1
2019 2
2020 1
Total 122
Download as CSV

Louise A. Rohrbach publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise A. Rohrbach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 122 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 122
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Louise A. Rohrbach D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise A. Rohrbach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Louise A. Rohrbach is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on health professions, with a strong emphasis on general health professions, epidemiology, speech and hearing, and public health, environmental and occupational health. The breadth of their work covers various aspects of adolescent and public health.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • School Health and Nursing Education
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences Research and Education

Louise A. Rohrbach has contributed to several publications, predominantly in the domain of public health and education. Their recent scholarly papers include:

  • Independent Evaluation of the California Tobacco Control Program: Relationships Between Program Exposure and Outcomes, 1996-1998, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Russian adolescent sexual behaviour and contraceptive knowledge, 2020, Sex Education
  • The Prevalence of Evidence-Based Drug Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools in 2005, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • The Effects of No Child Left Behind on the Prevalence of Evidence-Based Drug Prevention Curricula in the Nation's Middle Schools*, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Responses to positive results from suspicionless random drug tests in US Public School Districts: Research article, 2020, UNC Libraries

The majority of their publications appear in UNC Libraries, a frequent venue for Louise A. Rohrbach's work, along with at least one paper published in the journal Sex Education.

Louise A. Rohrbach has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including:

  • Chris Ringwalt
  • Amy A. Vincus
  • Seán Hanley
  • Susan T. Ennett
  • Jennifer B. Unger

Best Publications

  • Diffusion of a School-Based Substance Abuse Prevention Program: Predictors of Program Implementation

    Louise Ann Rohrbach;John W. Graham;William B. Hansen

  • Social network predictors of bullying and victimization.

    Michele Mouttapa;Tom Valente;Peggy Gallaher;Louise Ann Rohrbach

  • A comparison of current practice in school-based substance use prevention programs with meta-analysis findings.

    Susan T. Ennett;Christopher L. Ringwalt;Judy Thorne;Louise Ann Rohrbach

  • Type II Translation: Transporting Prevention Interventions From Research to Real-World Settings.

    Louise A. Rohrbach;Rachel Grana;Steve Sussman;Thomas W. Valente

  • Factors Associated with Fidelity to Substance Use Prevention Curriculum Guides in the Nation's Middle Schools:

    Christopher L. Ringwalt;Susan Ennett;Ruby Johnson;Louise Ann Rohrbach

  • Translation in the health professions: converting science into action.

    Steve Sussman;Thomas W. Valente;Louise A. Rohrbach;Silvana Skara

  • Addressing Core Challenges for the Next Generation of Type 2 Translation Research and Systems: The Translation Science to Population Impact (TSci Impact) Framework

    Richard Spoth;Louise A. Rohrbach;Mark Greenberg;Philip Leaf

  • English language use as a risk factor for smoking initiation among Hispanic and Asian American adolescents: evidence for mediation by tobacco-related beliefs and social norms.

    Jennifer B. Unger;Tess Boley Cruz;Louise Ann Rohrbach;Kurt M. Ribisl

  • Program integrity as a moderator of prevention program effectiveness: results for fifth-grade students in the adolescent alcohol prevention trial.

    William B. Hansen;John W. Graham;Bonnie H. Wolkenstein;Louise A. Rohrbach

  • Motivational Interviewing for adolescent substance use: a review of the literature.

    Elizabeth Barnett;Steve Sussman;Caitlin Smith;Louise A. Rohrbach

  • Effects of a community-based prevention program on decreasing drug use in high-risk adolescents

    C P Chou;S Montgomery;M A Pentz;L A Rohrbach

  • Gender differences in HIV risk behaviors among young injectors and their social network members.

    Susanne B. Montgomery;Justeen Hyde;Christine Johnson De Rosa;Louise Ann Rohrbach

  • The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools.

    Christopher L. Ringwalt;Susan Ennett;Amy Vincus;Judy Thorne

  • Diffusion of School-Based Substance Abuse Prevention Programs

    Louise Ann Rohrbach;Carol N. D'onofrio;Thomas E. Backer;Susanne B. Montgomery

  • Recognition and Liking of Tobacco and Alcohol Advertisements Among Adolescents: Relationships with Susceptibility to Substance Use

    J.B. Unger;C.A. Johnson;L.A. Rohrbach

  • Reasons for teachers' adaptation of substance use prevention curricula in schools with non-white student populations.

    Christopher L. Ringwalt;Amy Vincus;Susan Ennett;Ruby Johnson

  • Ethnic variation in peer influences on adolescent smoking.

    Jennifer B. Unger;Louise Ann Rohrbach;Tess Boley Cruz;Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati

  • Fidelity of implementation in Project Towards No Drug Abuse (TND): a comparison of classroom teachers and program specialists.

    Louise A. Rohrbach;Clyde W. Dent;Silvana Skara;Ping Sun

  • One-year outcomes of a drug abuse prevention program for older teens and emerging adults: Evaluating a motivational interviewing booster component.

    Steve Sussman;Ping Sun;Louise A. Rohrbach;Donna Spruijt-Metz

  • The influence of school-based natural mentoring relationships on school attachment and subsequent adolescent risk behaviors

    David S. Black;Jerry L. Grenard;Steve Sussman;Louise A. Rohrbach

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve Sussman
Steve Sussman University of Southern California
Ping Sun
Ping Sun University of Southern California
Jennifer B. Unger
Jennifer B. Unger University of Southern California
Susan T. Ennett
Susan T. Ennett University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Donna Spruijt-Metz
Donna Spruijt-Metz University of Southern California
Christopher L. Ringwalt
Christopher L. Ringwalt University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
C. Anderson Johnson
C. Anderson Johnson Claremont Graduate University
Clyde W. Dent
Clyde W. Dent University of Southern California
Mary Ann Pentz
Mary Ann Pentz University of Southern California
Tess Boley Cruz
Tess Boley Cruz University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens a range of educational and career opportunities. For those looking to advance quickly and affordably, an online bachelor's degree offers flexibility and can serve as a strong foundation for specialized roles or further study.

Graduate degrees boost your credentials and expand job prospects in education, policy, psychology, and more. A online master degree in psychology is a popular choice for those aiming to work in counseling, human resources, or research, with many affordable options now available.

Time-conscious learners can benefit from 1 year master's programs that balance academic rigor with a shortened completion timeline. For future educators and administrators, the fastest edd program online lets you advance to leadership roles efficiently without compromising quality.

Online degrees in the US deliver flexibility for working professionals and those with busy schedules. Many pathways exist to match your career goals while letting you learn at your own pace, making higher education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Louise A. Rohrbach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles