World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3612 3330 2026 1825 118 38060

John W. Graham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John W. Graham between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John W. Graham published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2012. 1 of the 150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2012. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1979 2025

150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John W. Graham: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 3
1985 2
1986 4
1987 7
1988 2
1989 6
1990 4
1991 6
1992 2
1993 5
1994 8
1995 5
1996 6
1997 4
1998 5
1999 2
2000 7
2001 2
2002 4
2003 5
2004 3
2005 1
2006 4
2007 1
2008 3
2009 4
2010 2
2011 0
2012 18
2013 5
2014 3
2015 5
2016 1
2017 2
2018 3
2019 1
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 1
Total 150
Download as CSV

John W. Graham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Graham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 118
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John W. Graham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Graham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1993 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

John W. Graham is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within social and health sciences, focusing primarily on medicine, psychology, and social sciences.

The scientist's work covers subfields such as clinical psychology, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, safety research, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Some of the main research topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Homelessness and social issues
  • Maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum
  • Child welfare and adoption
  • Prenatal substance exposure effects
  • Child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development
  • Family support in illness
  • Child abuse and trauma

Selected recent papers illustrate the focus areas of their research:

  • Predictors and moderators of improved social-emotional functioning in mothers with substance use disorders and their young children enrolled in a relationship-based case management program, 2020, Infant Mental Health Journal
  • A Trauma-Informed Parenting Intervention Model for Mothers Parenting Young Children During Residential Treatment for Substance Use Disorder, 2022, Occupational Therapy in Mental Health
  • Unexplained Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Abuse in a Prospective Study of Children at Risk for Abuse and Neglect, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Resolution of Depression and Grief during the First Year after Miscarriage: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Couples-Focused Interventions, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Influence of caregiver network support and caregiver psychopathology on child mental health need and service use in the LONGSCAN study, 2020, UNC Libraries

John W. Graham has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Therese M. Grant, Donald J. Baumann, John Fluke, Susan A. Stoner, and Ursula C. Hildebrandt.

The scientist's work is often published in venues such as UNC Libraries, Infant Mental Health Journal, Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, Research Square, and BMC Public Health.

John W. Graham was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1993.

Best Publications

  • Missing data: Our view of the state of the art.

    Joseph L. Schafer;John W. Graham

  • Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world.

    John W. Graham

  • Methods for Handling Missing Data

    John W. Graham;Patricio E. Cumsille;Elvira Elek-Fisk

  • 4 Methods for Handling Missing Data

    John W. Graham;Patricio E. Cumsille;Allison E. Shevock

  • Exploring the effects of age of alcohol use initiation and psychosocial risk factors on subsequent alcohol misuse

    J. D. Hawkins;J. W. Graham;E. Maguin;R. Abbott

  • Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms.

    William B. Hansen;John W. Graham

  • Adding Missing-Data-Relevant Variables to FIML-Based Structural Equation Models

    John W. Graham

  • Planned missing data designs in psychological research.

    John W. Graham;Bonnie J. Taylor;Allison E. Olchowski;Patricio E. Cumsille

  • Diffusion of a School-Based Substance Abuse Prevention Program: Predictors of Program Implementation

    Louise Ann Rohrbach;John W. Graham;William B. Hansen

  • Maximizing the Usefulness of Data Obtained with Planned Missing Value Patterns: An Application of Maximum Likelihood Procedures.

    John W. Graham;Scott M. Hofer;David P. MacKinnon

  • Social influence processes affecting adolescent substance use.

    John W. Graham;Gary Marks;William B. Hansen

  • Multiple Imputation in Multivariate Research

    John W. Graham;Scott M. Hofer

  • Affective and social influences approaches to the prevention of multiple substance abuse among seventh grade students: Results from project SMART

    William B. Hansen;C.Anderson Johnson;Brian R. Flay;John W. Graham

  • Testing the Generalizability of Intervening Mechanism Theories: Understanding the Effects of Adolescent Drug Use Prevention Interventions

    Stewart I. Donaldson;John W. Graham;William B. Hansen

  • Analysis with missing data in prevention research

    J. W. Graham;S. Hopfer;S. I. Donaldson;D. P. MacKinnon

  • Peer influence on smoking initiation during early adolescence: a comparison of group members and group outsiders.

    Patricia A. Aloise-Young;John W. Graham;William B. Hansen

  • Evaluating Interventions with Differential Attrition: The Importance of Nonresponse Mechanisms and Use of Follow-up Data

    John W. Graham;Stewart I. Donaldson

  • The consistency of peer and parent influences on tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use among young adolescents.

    William B. Hansen;John W. Graham;Judith L. Sobel;David R. Shelton

  • Analysis with missing data in drug prevention research.

    J. W. Graham;S. M. Hofer;A. M. Piccinin

  • Modeling transitions in latent stage-sequential processes: a substance use prevention example.

    John W. Graham;Linda M. Collins;Stuart E. Wugalter;N. K. Chung

  • Resistance-skills training and onset of alcohol use: Evidence for beneficial and potentially harmful effects in public schools and in private Catholic schools.

    Stewart I. Donaldson;John W. Graham;Andrea M. Piccinin;William B. Hansen

Frequent Co-Authors

William B. Hansen
William B. Hansen University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Linda M. Collins
Linda M. Collins New York University
Brian R. Flay
Brian R. Flay Boise State University
Michael L. Hecht
Michael L. Hecht Pennsylvania State University
C. Anderson Johnson
C. Anderson Johnson Claremont Graduate University
Linda L. Caldwell
Linda L. Caldwell Pennsylvania State University
Gary Marks
Gary Marks Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Louise A. Rohrbach
Louise A. Rohrbach University of Southern California
Alan J. Flisher
Alan J. Flisher University of Cape Town
Steve Sussman
Steve Sussman University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of online programs and rewarding careers, particularly in mental health counseling. Prospective mental health counselors can pursue specialized education and training online, often as a path to meeting region-specific requirements.

Each location may set unique standards for aspiring professionals. For instance, mental health counselor requirements in Virginia Beach include a graduate degree, supervised experience, and passing relevant examinations. Similarly, those researching how to become a mental health counselor in Washington DC will find licensure and education prerequisites guided by local regulations.

In the Midwest, Wichita mental health counselor education requirements stress accredited counseling degrees and clinical experience. Likewise, learning how to become a mental health counselor in Winston Salem involves understanding state-specific licensing steps.

Exploring accredited online degrees in Psychology can help students align their studies with the requirements in their desired location, ensuring they’re ready for a successful career in mental health counseling across the USA.

Best Scientists Citing John W. Graham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles