World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Teena Willoughby

Teena Willoughby

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
13781
World Ranking
3003
National Ranking
188

Teena Willoughby publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teena Willoughby sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Teena Willoughby D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teena Willoughby sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Teena Willoughby is affiliated with Brock University in Canada and specializes in the field of Psychology with a focus on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Sociology and Political Science. Their research encompasses a range of topics including Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Deception Detection and Forensic Psychology, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research, and Child Abuse and Trauma.

Their scholarly output includes publications across multiple respected venues. Frequent publication venues for their work include the Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Journal of Adolescence, Developmental Psychology, and Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience.

Significant papers authored or coauthored by Willoughby include:

  • Is adolescence a time of heightened risk taking? An overview of types of risk-taking behaviors across age groups, 2021, Developmental Review
  • A Longitudinal Examination of the Relation Between Lie-Telling, Secrecy, Parent-Child Relationship Quality, and Depressive Symptoms in Late-Childhood and Adolescence, 2020, Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Cortical maturation from childhood to adolescence is reflected in resting state EEG signal complexity, 2021, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • A Longitudinal Person-Centered Examination of Affinity for Aloneness Among Children and Adolescents, 2020, Child Development
  • Affinity for Solitude and Motivations for Spending Time Alone Among Early and Mid- Adolescents, 2021, Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Teena Willoughby collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Taylor Heffer, Meghan E. Borg, Victoria W. Dykstra, Angela D. Evans, and Louis A. Schmidt.

Their research efforts span both theoretical and empirical approaches, often employing longitudinal designs to explore developmental trajectories and relational dynamics in childhood and adolescence. Topics such as risk-taking behaviors, secrecy, lie-telling, depressive symptoms, cortical maturation, and affinity for solitude are explored within the broader context of developmental psychology and neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration

    Julie Mueller;Eileen Wood;Teena Willoughby;Craig Ross

  • Examining the link between nonsuicidal self-injury and suicidal behavior: a review of the literature and an integrated model.

    Chloe A. Hamza;Shannon L. Stewart;Teena Willoughby

  • More than Just Fun and Games: The Longitudinal Relationships between Strategic Video Games, Self-Reported Problem Solving Skills, and Academic Grades.

    Paul J. C. Adachi;Teena Willoughby

  • Interpreting effect sizes when controlling for stability effects in longitudinal autoregressive models: Implications for psychological science

    Paul Adachi;Teena Willoughby

  • The Effect of Video Game Competition and Violence on Aggressive Behavior: Which Characteristic Has the Greatest Influence?

    Paul J. C. Adachi;Teena Willoughby

  • A short-term longitudinal study of Internet and computer game use by adolescent boys and girls: prevalence, frequency of use, and psychosocial predictors.

    Teena Willoughby

  • The effect of violent video games on aggression: Is it more than just the violence?☆

    Paul J.C. Adachi;Teena Willoughby

  • Impulsivity and nonsuicidal self-injury: A review and meta-analysis

    Chloe A. Hamza;Teena Willoughby;Taylor Heffer

  • A longitudinal examination of breadth and intensity of youth activity involvement and successful development.

    Michael A Busseri;Linda Rose-Krasnor;Teena Willoughby;Heather Chalmers

  • A longitudinal study of the association between violent video game play and aggression among adolescents.

    Teena Willoughby;Paul J. C. Adachi;Marie Good

  • Examining the link between adolescent brain development and risk taking from a social-developmental perspective.

    Teena Willoughby;Marie Good;Paul J. C. Adachi;Chloe Andrea Hamza

  • Breadth and Intensity of Youth Activity Involvement as Contexts for Positive Development

    Linda Rose-Krasnor;Michael A. Busseri;Teena Willoughby;Heather Chalmers

  • Teachers’ Perceptions: barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom

    Eileen Wood;Julie Mueller;Teena Willoughby;Jacqueline Specht

  • Adolescence as a sensitive period for spiritual development.

    Marie Good;Teena Willoughby

  • The Role of Spirituality Versus Religiosity in Adolescent Psychosocial Adjustment

    Marie Good;Teena Willoughby

  • The Longitudinal Association Between Social-Media Use and Depressive Symptoms Among Adolescents and Young Adults: An Empirical Reply to Twenge et al. (2018):

    Taylor Heffer;Marie Good;Owen Daly;Elliott T. MacDonell

  • A primer of research on cognitive strategy instruction: The important issues and how to address them

    Michael Pressley;Vera Woloshyn;Linda M. Lysynchuk;Vicky Martin

  • A Longitudinal Examination of the Bidirectional Associations Among Perceived Parenting Behaviors, Adolescent Disclosure and Problem Behavior Across the High School Years

    Teena Willoughby;Chloe A. Hamza

  • Perceived parental monitoring, adolescent disclosure, and adolescent depressive symptoms: a longitudinal examination.

    Chloe A. Hamza;Teena Willoughby

  • Where Is the Syndrome? Examining Co-Occurrence Among Multiple Problem Behaviors in Adolescence.

    Teena Willoughby;Heather Chalmers;Michael A. Busseri

Frequent Co-Authors

Eileen Wood
Eileen Wood Wilfrid Laurier University
Michael A. Busseri
Michael A. Busseri Brock University
Linda Rose-Krasnor
Linda Rose-Krasnor Brock University
Gordon Hodson
Gordon Hodson Brock University
Peter Rosenbaum
Peter Rosenbaum McMaster University
Mary Law
Mary Law McMaster University
Michael Pressley
Michael Pressley Michigan State University
Gillian King
Gillian King Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Anthony F. Bogaert
Anthony F. Bogaert Brock University
Louis A. Schmidt
Louis A. Schmidt McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree opens doors to a wide array of online degrees and career pathways—one of the most notable being social work. In the United States, the educational requirements for social workers vary by state, with each state maintaining its own minimum standards for practice and licensure.

For example, the Florida minimum degree requirement for social workers typically includes a bachelor's or master's degree in social work from an accredited program. Similarly, you can review the Georgia education requirements for social workers to see how some states may demand additional clinical experience or specialized coursework.

The path to becoming a social worker can look different across the country. Take a look at the social worker education requirements in Hawaii and the Idaho minimum degree requirement for social workers to understand the nuance of local licensing laws. By researching these requirements, students interested in psychology and allied professions can align their program choices with their career goals and location preferences.

Best Scientists Citing Teena Willoughby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles