World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
105
Citations
38288
World Ranking
496
National Ranking
317

Michael Pressley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Pressley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 275 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael Pressley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Pressley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Pressley was affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States. Their career involved work in academic research and science, although specific details regarding research topics, fields of study, or subfields were not provided.

There are no records available of recent papers authored by Michael Pressley, nor information on frequent co-authors or regular publication venues. Likewise, there is no data indicating book publications or awards received throughout their career.

Without data on main topics or fields of study, it is not possible to outline the focus areas or themes of their research activities. Similarly, absent details on publication titles, years, or venues limit insights into the precise nature and scope of their scholarly contributions.

Best Publications

  • Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading

    Michael Pressley;Peter Afflerbach

  • Behavioral Development and Construct Validity: The Principle of Aggregation

    J. Philippe Rushton;Charles J. Brainerd;Michael Pressley

  • Reading Instruction That Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching

    Michael Pressley

  • Cognitive Strategy Instruction That Really Improves Children's Academic Performance

    Michael Pressley

  • What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of

    Michael Pressley

  • Comprehension instruction : research-based best practices

    Cathy Collins Block;Michael Pressley

  • A Quasi-experimental Validation of Transactional Strategies Instruction with Low-Achieving Second-Grade Readers.

    Rachel Brown;Michael Pressley;Peggy Van Meter;Ted Schuder

  • Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided Discussions

    Kathleen Hogan;Bonnie K. Nastasi;Michael Pressley

  • Beyond Direct Explanation: Transactional Instruction of Reading Comprehension Strategies.

    Michael Pressley;Pamela Beard El-Dinary;Irene Gaskins;Ted Schuder

  • Memory Development Between 2 and 20

    Wolfgang Schneider;Michael Pressley

  • The Mnemonic Keyword Method

    Michael Pressley;Joel R. Levin;Harold D. Delaney

  • Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge

    Michael Pressley;John G. Borkowski;Wolfgang Schneider

  • Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues.

    Kathleen Hogan;Michael Pressley

  • A Study of Effective First-Grade Literacy Instruction

    Michael Pressley;Ruth Wharton-McDonald;Richard Allington;Cathy Collins Block

  • Cognitive Strategies Instruction: From Basic Research to Classroom Instruction

    Michael Pressley;Karen R. Harris

  • Literacy Instruction in Nine First-Grade Classrooms: Teacher Characteristics and Student Achievement

    Ruth Wharton-McDonald;Michael Pressley;Jennifer Mistretta Hampston

  • Encouraging Mindful Use of Prior Knowledge: Attempting to Construct Explanatory Answers Facilitates Learning

    Michael Pressley;Eileen Wood;Vera E. Woloshyn;Vicki Martin

  • The Nature of Cognitive Strategy Instruction: Interactive Strategy Construction

    Karen R. Harris;Michael Pressley

  • The Challenges of Classroom Strategy Instruction

    Michael Pressley;Fiona Goodchild;Joan Fleet;Richard Zajchowski

  • Self-Regulated Learning: Monitoring Learning From Text

    Michael Pressley;Elizabeth S. Ghatala

  • Best Practices in Literacy Instruction

    Lesley Mandel Morrow;Linda B. Gambrell;Michael Pressley

Frequent Co-Authors

Joel R. Levin
Joel R. Levin University of Arizona
Wolfgang Schneider
Wolfgang Schneider University of Würzburg
Karen R. Harris
Karen R. Harris Arizona State University
Mark A. McDaniel
Mark A. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Charles J. Brainerd
Charles J. Brainerd Cornell University
Lesley Mandel Morrow
Lesley Mandel Morrow Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
John G. Borkowski
John G. Borkowski University of Notre Dame
Eileen Wood
Eileen Wood Wilfrid Laurier University
Richard L. Allington
Richard L. Allington University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Nell K. Duke
Nell K. Duke University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology opens doors to a range of academic and career options, both online and on campus. The journey begins by understanding how long is psychology school. A bachelor’s degree typically takes four years, but advanced roles require more study. For those who wish to become clinical psychologists, it’s important to explore the requirements for clinical psychology psyd degree as these programs can take up to eight years of education and training.

However, psychology is not limited to clinical work. Students interested in workplace behavior may pursue careers in industrial-organizational psychology, which focus on improving employee well-being and productivity in organizations.

Many prospective students also wonder, is a psychology degree worth it? The answer varies depending on your career goals and the time you’re willing to invest. Psychology degrees offer flexibility across industries, but higher-level roles require advanced education and credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Pressley

Recently Published Articles