What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Cognition
- Cognitive psychology
- Artificial intelligence
His primary areas of study are Cognitive psychology, Nonverbal communication, Recall, Cognition and Concreteness.
His Cognitive psychology research includes elements of Cognitive Mediation, Noun, Social psychology and Paired associate learning.
He interconnects Philosophy of science and Mental representation in the investigation of issues within Nonverbal communication.
His Dual-coding theory and Neural binding study in the realm of Cognition interacts with subjects such as Research literature.
His research in Dual-coding theory intersects with topics in Elementary cognitive task, Creativity, Comprehension, Cognitive science and Evolutionary psychology.
His studies deal with areas such as Sentence, Verbal learning, Method of loci and Psycholinguistics as well as Concreteness.
His most cited work include:
- Imagery and verbal processes (3889 citations)
- Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach (3544 citations)
- Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns (2422 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Noun, Recall and Dual-coding theory are his primary areas of study.
His study of Concreteness is a part of Cognitive psychology.
His research links Cognitive science with Cognition.
His work on Adjective as part of general Noun study is frequently connected to Order, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
His work in Recall addresses issues such as Social psychology, which are connected to fields such as Word.
The various areas that Allan Paivio examines in his Dual-coding theory study include Picture naming, Comprehension and Reading.
He most often published in these fields:
- Cognitive psychology (53.22%)
- Cognition (19.88%)
- Noun (19.88%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 1989-2017)?
- Dual-coding theory (15.20%)
- Cognitive psychology (53.22%)
- Cognition (19.88%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Dual-coding theory, Cognitive psychology, Cognition, Cognitive science and Comprehension.
His Dual-coding theory research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Picture naming, Nonverbal communication, Mandarin Chinese, Mnemonic and Artificial intelligence.
His study in Recall and Concreteness is carried out as part of his Cognitive psychology studies.
His Concreteness research includes themes of Mental image, Educational psychology, Verbal learning, Educational research and Teacher education.
His work deals with themes such as Mental lexicon and Reading, which intersect with Cognition.
His study in Cognitive science is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Development, Theory of mind, Representational systems and Neural binding.
Between 1989 and 2017, his most popular works were:
- Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. (1256 citations)
- Dual coding theory and education (1132 citations)
- Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing (308 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Cognition
- Artificial intelligence
- Cognitive psychology
His main research concerns Dual-coding theory, Cognition, Cognitive psychology, Cognitive science and Recall.
The concepts of his Dual-coding theory study are interwoven with issues in Nonverbal communication and Topology.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Object, Comprehension and Reading in addition to Cognition.
His study in the field of Concreteness is also linked to topics like Identification.
He works mostly in the field of Concreteness, limiting it down to concerns involving Cued recall and, occasionally, Noun.
His Cognitive science study incorporates themes from Creativity, Neural binding, Evolutionary psychology, Theory of mind and Genius.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
