World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Charles J. Brainerd

Charles J. Brainerd

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 83 1271 1124 771 664 275 26083

Charles J. Brainerd publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Charles J. Brainerd between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Charles J. Brainerd published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2013. 8 of the 292 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2013. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 4 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 5 publications 1974: 9 publications 1975: 6 publications 1976: 7 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 10 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 5 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
1969 2025

292 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Charles J. Brainerd: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 1
1971 4
1972 3
1973 5
1974 9
1975 6
1976 7
1977 4
1978 8
1979 6
1980 2
1981 3
1982 10
1983 8
1984 5
1985 10
1986 1
1987 5
1988 8
1989 4
1990 9
1991 4
1992 2
1993 7
1994 3
1995 8
1996 2
1997 4
1998 5
1999 0
2000 1
2001 3
2002 5
2003 3
2004 3
2005 9
2006 3
2007 3
2008 10
2009 3
2010 4
2011 6
2012 6
2013 12
2014 6
2015 6
2016 3
2017 7
2018 6
2019 5
2020 5
2021 10
2022 7
2023 4
2024 3
2025 5
Total 292
Download as CSV

Charles J. Brainerd publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles J. Brainerd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 275 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 275
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Charles J. Brainerd D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles J. Brainerd sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112 83
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Charles J. Brainerd is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on memory processes and influences, with a strong presence in related disciplines such as neuroscience and psychology. The cognitive neuroscience subfield is notably prominent in their body of work, complemented by research spanning social psychology, artificial intelligence, developmental and educational psychology, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist has published in several frequent venues, including:

  • Journal of Memory and Language
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Metacognition and Learning
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Memory & Cognition

Key topics addressed in their publications include:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Topic Modeling

Charles J. Brainerd has frequently collaborated with a range of coauthors, including:

  • Min Chang
  • D. M. Bialer
  • Valerie F. Reyna
  • X. Liu
  • Michael P. Toglia

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Semantic and phonological false memory: A review of theory and data, 2021, Journal of Memory and Language
  • Numeracy, gist, literal thinking and the value of nothing in decision making, 2023, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Association and dissociation between judgments of learning and memory: A Meta-analysis of the font size effect, 2022, Metacognition and Learning
  • Semantic ambiguity and memory, 2021, Journal of Memory and Language
  • Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory: Meta-analysis of conjoint recognition, 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Their work often intersects areas of memory research with decision-making and behavioral economics, as well as educational psychology, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to understanding cognitive functions and psychological processes.

Best Publications

  • Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis

    Valerie F. Reyna;Charles J. Brainerd

  • Behavioral Development and Construct Validity: The Principle of Aggregation

    J. Philippe Rushton;Charles J. Brainerd;Michael Pressley

  • The science of false memory

    Charles J. Brainerd;Valerie F. Reyna

  • Piaget's theory of intelligence

    Charles J. Brainerd

  • Fuzzy-Trace Theory and False Memory

    C.J. Brainerd;V.F. Reyna

  • The stage question in cognitive-developmental theory

    Charles J. Brainerd

  • Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism☆

    C.J Brainerd;V.F Reyna

  • Numeracy, Ratio Bias, and Denominator Neglect in Judgments of Risk and Probability.

    Valerie F. Reyna;Charles J. Brainerd

  • Developmental Reversals in False Memory: A Review of Data and Theory

    C. J. Brainerd;V. F. Reyna;S. J. Ceci

  • Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in choice: Gist extraction, truncation, and conversion

    Valerie F. Reyna;Charles J. Brainerd

  • Dual processes in decision making and developmental neuroscience: A fuzzy-trace model

    Valerie F. Reyna;Charles J. Brainerd

  • The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making

    Valerie F. Reyna;Charles J. Brainerd

  • Fuzzy-trace Theory and Children's False Memories

    C.J. Brainerd;V.F. Reyna

  • Fuzzy-Trace Theory: Dual Processes in Memory, Reasoning, and Cognitive Neuroscience

    C J Brainerd;V F Reyna

  • The Development of Forgetting and Reminiscence

    C J Brainerd;V F Reyna;M L Howe;J Kingma

  • Recollection rejection: False-memory editing in children and adults

    C. J. Brainerd;V. F. Reyna;Ron Wright;A. H. Mojardin

  • Conjoint recognition and phantom recollection.

    C. J. Brainerd;R. Wright;V. F. Reyna;A. H. Mojardin

  • Judgments and explanations as criteria for the presence of cognitive structures.

    Charles J. Brainerd

  • FALSE-RECOGNITION REVERSAL: WHEN SIMILARITY IS DISTINCTIVE

    C.J. Brainerd;V.F. Reyna;R. Kneer

  • Memory independence and memory interference in cognitive development.

    C. J. Brainerd;V. F. Reyna

  • Beyond universals in cognitive development: By David H. Feldman. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex, 1980. xx + 204 pp., $17.50☆

    Charles J. Brainerd

Frequent Co-Authors

Valerie F. Reyna
Valerie F. Reyna Cornell University
Mark L. Howe
Mark L. Howe City, University of London
Michael Pressley
Michael Pressley Michigan State University
Peter A. Ornstein
Peter A. Ornstein University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jeffrey Bisanz
Jeffrey Bisanz University of Alberta
Glenn E. Smith
Glenn E. Smith University of Florida
Stephen J. Ceci
Stephen J. Ceci Cornell University
Robert Kail
Robert Kail Purdue University West Lafayette
Michael J. Stones
Michael J. Stones Lakehead University
Gwenith G. Fisher
Gwenith G. Fisher Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Psychology opens a wide range of professional avenues, including specialized roles like marriage and family therapy (MFT). Many students begin their journey with online degrees, which offer flexibility and are well-suited for balancing studies with other commitments. These programs help equip future therapists with the crucial skills needed for clinical practice, counseling, and mental health support.

If you’re considering a therapy career, it’s important to understand the specific qualifications required in various locations. For example, resources on how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Diego, how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Diego, and how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Francisco detail local licensure pathways and job prospects.

Understanding certification and education requirements is also essential. For instance, San Jose mft certification requirements and Santa Ana mft education requirements outline what’s necessary to practice in those specific regions.

Whether you aim to become a licensed therapist or wish to explore other psychology careers, these links provide guidance on education options, certification standards, and key steps required for success in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Charles J. Brainerd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles