World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael J. Stones

Michael J. Stones

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
5584
World Ranking
10155
National Ranking
711

Michael J. Stones publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Stones sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael J. Stones D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Stones sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Stones is affiliated with Lakehead University in Canada. Their research spans several main fields of study, including Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions. The subfields covered by their work include Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and General Health Professions.

Their research topics include:

  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Michael J. Stones has one recent paper entitled Editorial: Modeling Human Potential Across the Lifespan, published in 2020 in Frontiers in Psychology.

In addition to their journal publications, they have contributed to book publications. One such work is titled Suggestions for Addressing Clinical and Non-Clinical Issues in Palliative Care, published in 2020 by IntechOpen.

Their frequent coauthors include Joe Baker, Marco Cascella, Jason Randle, and Peter Brink.

Publication venues for Michael J. Stones are limited to Frontiers in Psychology.

Best Publications

  • Predicting caregiver burden and depression in Alzheimer's disease.

    Leah D. Clyburn;Michael J. Stones;Thomas Hadjistavropoulos;Holly Tuokko

  • The independent contribution of driver, crash, and vehicle characteristics to driver fatalities

    Michel Bédard;Gordon H. Guyatt;Michael J. Stones;John P. Hirdes

  • The measurement of happiness: development of the Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness (MUNSH).

    Albert Kozma;M. J. Stones

  • Burden in caregivers of cognitively impaired older adults living in the community: methodological issues and determinants.

    Michel Bédard;David Pedlar;Nancy J. Martin;Olga Malott

  • Stability in components and predictors of subjective well-being (SWB): implications for SWB structure

    Albert Kozma;Susan Stone;M. J. Stones

  • Predictors of happiness.

    Albert Kozma;Michael J. Stones

  • Structural relationships among happiness scales: A second order factorial study

    M. J. Stones;A. Kozma

  • Social Desirability in Measures of Subjective Well-being: a Systematic Evaluation

    Albert Kozma;M. J. Stones

  • Measuring depression in nursing home residents with the MDS and GDS: an observational psychometric study.

    Melissa Koehler;Terry Rabinowitz;John Hirdes;Michael Stones

  • A Controlled Evaluation of Reminiscence and Current Topics Discussion Groups in a Nursing Home Context

    Christine Rattenbury;M. J. Stones

  • Subjective well-being in later life: Issues concerning measurement and prediction

    J. Kevin McNeil;M. J. Stones;Albert Kozma

  • Social desirability in measures of subjective well-being: Age comparisons

    Albert Kozma;M. J. Stones

  • Associations Between Dysfunctional Behaviors, Gender, and Burden in Spousal Caregivers of Cognitively Impaired Older Adults

    Michel Bédard;D. William Molloy;David Pedlar;Judith A. Lever

  • Development of delirium: a prospective cohort study in a community hospital

    Nancy J. Martin;Michael J. Stones;Janet E. Young;Michel Bédard

  • Issues Relating to the Usage and Conceptualization of Mental Health Constructs Employed by Gerontologists

    M. J. Stones;A. Kozma

  • Age, exercise, and coding performance.

    M. J. Stones;Albert Kozma

  • Predictors of a new depression diagnosis among older adults admitted to complex continuing care: implications for the depression rating scale (DRS)

    Lynn Martin;Jeff W. Poss;John P. Hirdes;Richard N. Jones

  • Examination of the relationship among hearing impairment, linguistic communication, mood, and social engagement of residents in complex continuing-care facilities.

    Peter Brink;Michael Stones

  • Some research issues and findings in the study of psychological well-being in the aged.

    Albert Kozma;M. J. Stones

  • Senior-friendly emergency department care: an environmental assessment.

    Mary Lou Kelley;Belinda Parke;Nancy Jokinen;Michael Stones

Frequent Co-Authors

Michel Bédard
Michel Bédard Lakehead University
Mark L. Howe
Mark L. Howe City, University of London
Gordon H. Guyatt
Gordon H. Guyatt McMaster University
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos
Thomas Hadjistavropoulos University of Regina
Richard N. Jones
Richard N. Jones Brown University
Kenneth M. Prkachin
Kenneth M. Prkachin University of Northern British Columbia
Joseph Baker
Joseph Baker University of Toronto
Holly Tuokko
Holly Tuokko University of Victoria
Charles J. Brainerd
Charles J. Brainerd Cornell University
William A. Montevecchi
William A. Montevecchi Memorial University of Newfoundland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to flexible learning and diverse career pathways. When choosing a program, affordability is a crucial consideration. For example, prospective students can find affordable psychology degrees in Bethlehem, or look into affordable psychology programs in Boca Raton, making higher education more accessible regardless of location.

Those seeking education in major cities may be interested in the cheapest psychology degrees in Boston. Similarly, the West Coast offers numerous affordable psychology programs in California for students wanting to study in that region.

Graduates with a psychology degree can pursue various roles in counseling, mental health services, human resources, education, or research. Many online programs include internships or practical experiences, helping students build valuable skills. Carefully comparing tuition costs, program accreditation, and career support services can help you select the program that best suits your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Stones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles