World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 74 1879 1696 100 88 389 21555

Joseph Baker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joseph Baker between 1967 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joseph Baker published across 59 years, from 1967 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2017. 23 of the 455 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2017. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 29 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 32 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 38 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 17 publications
1967 2025

455 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joseph Baker: publications per year, 1967 to 2025
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 3
2000 6
2001 3
2002 2
2003 14
2004 3
2005 5
2006 8
2007 15
2008 12
2009 20
2010 26
2011 10
2012 17
2013 29
2014 25
2015 32
2016 32
2017 38
2018 27
2019 20
2020 29
2021 25
2022 13
2023 16
2024 6
2025 17
Total 455
Download as CSV

Joseph Baker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph Baker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–390 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 389 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58 389
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Joseph Baker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph Baker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 74
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joseph Baker is a researcher affiliated with York University in Canada, with a significant body of work focused on sports science, particularly in the areas of sports performance, psychology, and medicine. Their research spans topics such as talent identification and development, sports injuries, motivation, and sports analytics.

The main fields of study in Baker's research include Medicine and Psychology. Within these broad fields, subfields of interest are Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The primary topics covered in their work are:

  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Genetics and Physical Performance

Baker has published in several prominent journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)
  • Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
  • PLoS ONE
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Sports Medicine

Notable recent papers from Baker and colleagues are:

  • "Challenges and [Possible] Solutions to Optimizing Talent Identification and Development in Sport," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Talent Research in Sport 1990-2018: A Scoping Review," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Assessing Technical Skills in Talented Youth Athletes: A Systematic Review," 2020, Sports Medicine
  • "Defining "elite" status in sport: from chaos to clarity," 2021, German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research
  • "Waste Reduction Strategies: Factors Affecting Talent Wastage and the Efficacy of Talent Selection in Sport," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology

Joseph Baker collaborates frequently with several co-authors. These include:

  • Kathryn Johnston
  • Adam L. Kelly
  • A. McAuley
  • Nick Wattie
  • Alexandra Mosher

Best Publications

  • Practice and play in the development of sport expertise.

    Jean Côté;Joseph Baker;Bruce Abernethy

  • Sport-Specific Practice and the Development of Expert Decision-Making in Team Ball Sports

    Joseph Baker;Jeane Cote;Bruce Abernethy

  • Annual age-grouping and athlete development: a meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sport.

    Stephen Cobley;Joseph Baker;Nick Wattie;Jim McKenna

  • From play to practice: A developmental framework for the acquisition of expertise in team sports

    J. Cote;J. Baker;A.B. Abernethy

  • When “where” is more important than “when”: Birthplace and birthdate effects on the achievement of sporting expertise

    Jean Côté;Dany J. Macdonald;Joseph Baker;Bruce Abernethy

  • Early Specialization in Youth Sport: A Requirement for Adult Expertise?.

    Joseph Baker

  • A review of primary and secondary influences on sport expertise

    Joseph Baker;Sean Horton

  • NURTURING SPORT EXPERTISE: FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DEVELOPMENT OF ELITE ATHLETE

    Joseph Baker;Sean Horton;Jennifer Robertson-Wilson;Michael Wall

  • AOSSM Early Sport Specialization Consensus Statement

    Robert F. LaPrade;Julie Agel;Joseph Baker;Joel S. Brenner

  • Learning from the experts: practice activities of expert decision makers in sport.

    Joseph Baker;Jean Côté;Bruce Abernethy

  • Talent Identification in Sport: A Systematic Review

    Kathryn Johnston;Nick Wattie;Jörg Schorer;Joseph Baker

  • What do we know about early sport specialization? Not much!

    Joseph Baker;Stephen Cobley;Jessica Fraser‐Thomas

  • Transfer of pattern recall skills may contribute to the development of sport expertise

    Bruce Abernethy;Bruce Abernethy;Joseph Baker;Joseph Baker;Jean Côté;Jean Côté

  • Expertise in Ultra-Endurance Triathletes Early Sport Involvement, Training Structure, and the Theory of Deliberate Practice

    Joseph Baker;Jean Côté;Janice Deakin

  • Play and practice in the development of sport‐specific creativity in team ball sports

    Daniel Memmert;Joseph Baker;Claudia Bertsch

  • Influences of competition level, gender, player nationality, career stage and playing position on relative age effects.

    J. Schorer;S. Cobley;D. Büsch;H. Bräutigam

  • The Relative Age Effect in Sport: A Developmental Systems Model

    Nick Wattie;Jörg Schorer;Joseph Baker

  • Towards a unified understanding of relative age effects

    Nick Wattie;Stephen Cobley;Joseph Baker

  • 20 years later: deliberate practice and the development of expertise in sport

    Joseph Baker;Bradley Young

  • Relationship of physical fitness test results and hockey playing potential in elite-level ice hockey players.

    Jaime F Burr;Roni K Jamnik;Joseph Baker;Alison Macpherson

  • The relationship between coaching behaviours and sport anxiety in athletes

    Joseph Baker;Jean Côté;Robert Hawes

Frequent Co-Authors

Jörg Schorer
Jörg Schorer Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Jean Côté
Jean Côté Queen's University
Stephen Cobley
Stephen Cobley University of Sydney
Damian Farrow
Damian Farrow Victoria University
Werner Helsen
Werner Helsen KU Leuven
Bruce Abernethy
Bruce Abernethy University of Queensland
Keith Davids
Keith Davids Sheffield Hallam University
Jim McKenna
Jim McKenna Leeds Beckett University
Norbert Hagemann
Norbert Hagemann University of Kassel
Chris Visscher
Chris Visscher University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of rewarding career options in mental health, counseling, education, and more. As mental health awareness grows, the demand for licensed professionals continues to rise, making this a promising field for motivated students.

Key pathways include becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), clinical psychologist, or therapist. Each city and state in the USA has unique requirements for licensure, which makes it important to understand the specific steps relevant to your location. For example, if you’re interested in how to become a licensed therapist in Lexington, or exploring the process of becoming a licensed therapist in Lincoln, you'll find that education, supervised practice, and exams are key components.

Students considering major cities have additional resources. Guidance on how to become a licensed therapist in Long Beach or how to become a licensed therapist in Los Angeles highlights the importance of accredited programs and state regulations.

No matter where you choose to study, researching local requirements and selecting the right online degree program ensures you’re on the right path toward a fulfilling career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph Baker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles