World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Neena L. Chappell

Neena L. Chappell

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
6476
World Ranking
7327
National Ranking
492

Neena L. Chappell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neena L. Chappell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Neena L. Chappell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neena L. Chappell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neena L. Chappell is affiliated with the University of Victoria in Canada and has contributed to the field of social sciences, with a particular emphasis on health and aging. Their recent research spans several key themes including health disparities and outcomes, global health care issues, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, aging and gerontology research, employment and welfare studies, and racial and ethnic identity research.

Their publications cover multiple subfields such as health, general health professions, sociology and political science, social psychology, and neuropsychology and physiological psychology.

Recent papers by Neena L. Chappell include the following:

  • The Older, the Happier?: A Cross-Sectional Study on the "Paradox of Aging" in China, 2021, Research on Aging
  • Care-giver wellbeing: exploring gender, relationship-to-care-recipient and care-giving demands in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging, 2021, Ageing and Society

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Neena L. Chappell include:

  • Margaret J. Penning
  • Helena Kadlec
  • Sean Browning
  • Jia Li
  • Daniel W. L. Lai

Publications have appeared in various venues, among them:

  • Ageing and Society
  • Research on Aging
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Canadian Studies in Population

The work documented by Neena L. Chappell addresses issues relevant to demographic changes, caregiving dynamics, and factors influencing health and well-being across the lifespan. The research incorporates both quantitative and qualitative approaches to explore intersecting dimensions such as gender, race, immigrant status, and care demands in aging populations.

Best Publications

  • Burden and Well-Being Among Caregivers: Examining the Distinction

    Neena L. Chappell;R. Colin Reid

  • Who Cares and How Much? The Imputed Economic Contribution to the Canadian Healthcare System of Middle-Aged and Older Unpaid Caregivers Providing Care to The Elderly

    Marcus J. Hollander;Guiping Liu;Neena L. Chappell

  • Informal and Formal Care: Exploring the Complementarity

    Neena Chappell;Audrey Blandford

  • Social Isolation and Well-Being

    Neena L. Chappell;Mark Badger

  • Comparative Costs of Home Care and Residential Care

    Neena L. Chappell;Betty Havens Dlitt;Marcus J. Hollander;Jo Ann Miller

  • Caregiver Well-Being: Intersections of Relationship and Gender

    Neena L. Chappell;Carren Dujela;André Smith

  • The Role of Support in Alleviating Stress Among Nursing Assistants

    Neena L. Chappell;Mark Novak

  • Living arrangements and sources of caregiving.

    Neena L. Chappell

  • Receptivity to new technology among older adults.

    Z Zimmer;N L Chappell

  • The Gendered Nature of Filial Piety — A Study among Chinese Canadians

    Neena L. Chappell;Karen Kusch

  • Old and Female: Testing the Double Jeopardy Hypothesis

    Neena L. Chappell;Betty Havens

  • Social support, caregiving, and aging.

    Neena L. Chappell;Laura M. Funk

  • Confidants: Do They Make a Difference in Quality of Life?

    Laurel A. Strain;Neena L. Chappell

  • The primary care physician and Alzheimer's disease: An International position paper

    H. Villars;S. Oustric;S. Andrieu;Jean-Pierre Baeyens

  • Use of Traditional Chinese Medicine by older Chinese immigrants in Canada

    Daniel Lai;Neena Chappell

  • Psychological resilience predicts depressive symptoms among spouses of persons with Alzheimer disease over time

    Norm O'Rourke;Anthony L Kupferschmidt;Amy Claxton;Julianna Z Smith

  • Staff-based measures of individualized care for persons with dementia in long-term care facilities:

    Neena L. Chappell;R. Colin Reid;Jessica A. Gish

  • Behavioural Problems and Distress among Caregivers of People with Dementia

    Neena L. Chappell;Margaret Penning

  • Social Support and the Receipt of Home Care Services

    Neena L. Chappell

  • Aging and late-life depression.

    Zheng Wu;Christoph M. Schimmele;Neena L. Chappell

  • Respite reconsidered: A typology of meanings based on the caregiver's point of view

    Neena L Chappell;R.Colin Reid;Elizabeth Dow

  • Transactions between older people and the hospital environment: A social ecological analysis

    Belinda Parke;Neena L. Chappell

  • The Impact of Work Interferences on Family Caregiver Outcomes

    R. Colin Reid;Kelli I. Stajduhar;Neena L. Chappell

  • Canadian Journal on Aging [La Revue canadienne du vieillissement]

    Neena L. Chappell;François Béland;Evelyn Shapiro

Frequent Co-Authors

Zachary Zimmer
Zachary Zimmer Mount Saint Vincent University
Daniel W. L. Lai
Daniel W. L. Lai Hong Kong Baptist University
Norm O'Rourke
Norm O'Rourke Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Victor W. Marshall
Victor W. Marshall University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Zheng Wu
Zheng Wu Simon Fraser University
Norah Keating
Norah Keating Swansea University
Thomas B. L. Kirkwood
Thomas B. L. Kirkwood Newcastle University
Vern L. Bengtson
Vern L. Bengtson University of Southern California
François Béland
François Béland University of Montreal
Andrew V. Wister
Andrew V. Wister Simon Fraser University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up diverse academic and career options—especially for those interested in counseling and mental health. Pursuing an online degree in these fields has become more accessible, and affordability is a key concern for many students.

Fortunately, there are several programs across the country that focus on making quality education more cost-effective. For instance, students considering the West Coast can research the most affordable counseling degree programs in Los Angeles. In the Midwest, learners can find a variety of affordable counseling degrees in Michigan and affordable counseling programs in Minnesota, both offering excellent training at accessible rates.

For those located in the South, options like the cheapest counseling degrees in Nashville deliver strong value and open pathways to licensure and employment. Exploring these regional programs provides flexibility and helps you take the first step towards a career as a counselor, therapist, or clinical psychologist.

Best Scientists Citing Neena L. Chappell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles