World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
37
Citations
6164
World Ranking
6223
National Ranking
371

Arlene Astell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arlene Astell sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 231 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Arlene Astell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arlene Astell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arlene Astell is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has an extensive publication record in fields related to health professions, medicine, and social sciences. Their work primarily spans general health professions, demography, psychiatry and mental health, human-computer interaction, and sociology and political science as subfields.

The main research topics addressed by Astell include technology use by older adults, dementia and cognitive impairment research, geriatric care and nursing homes, aging and gerontology research, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, health disparities and outcomes, and stroke rehabilitation and recovery.

Astell has authored several recent papers, including:

  • Sex and gender differences in caregiving burden experienced by family caregivers of persons with dementia: A systematic review (2020), published in PLoS ONE
  • The Role of Eye Gaze in Regulating Turn Taking in Conversations: A Systematized Review of Methods and Findings (2021), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Coaching Through Technology: A Systematic Review into Efficacy and Effectiveness for the Ageing Population (2020), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Digital tools for delivery of dementia education for caregivers of persons with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of impact on caregiver distress and depressive symptoms (2023), published in PLoS ONE
  • Experiential Value of Technologies: A Qualitative Study with Older Adults (2022), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Astell include Erica Dove, Jennifer Boger, Louise Nygård, David A. Clayton, and Ann-Charlotte Nedlund.

Their work has been published in a variety of venues, with the most frequent being Alzheimer's & Dementia, Dementia, Innovation in Aging, Gerontechnology, and PLoS ONE. Astell has also contributed to the book titled AgeTech for Staying Connected, published in 2025 by Synthesis Lectures on Technology and Health.

Best Publications

  • Perspectives on ethnic and racial disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: Update and areas of immediate need

    Ganesh M. Babulal;Yakeel T. Quiroz;Benedict C. Albensi;Eider Arenaza-Urquijo

  • Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for Aging Well: A Scoping Review

    Stephanie Blackman;Claudine Matlo;Charisse Bobrovitskiy;Ashley Waldoch

  • Using a touch screen computer to support relationships between people with dementia and caregivers

    Arlene J. Astell;Maggie P. Ellis;Lauren Bernardi;Norman Alm

  • Sex and gender differences in caregiving burden experienced by family caregivers of persons with dementia: A systematic review.

    Chen Xiong;Chen Xiong;Melissa Biscardi;Melissa Biscardi;Arlene Astell;Arlene Astell;Emily Nalder

  • Molecular connexions between dementia and diabetes

    Adam R. Cole;Arlene Astell;Charlotte Green;Calum Sutherland

  • Memory bias for emotional facial expressions in major depression

    Nathan Ridout;Arlene J. Astell;Ian C. Reid;Tom Glen

  • A cognitive prosthesis and communication support for people with dementia

    Norman Alm;Arlene Astell;Maggie Ellis;Richard Dye

  • Technology and Dementia: The Future is Now.

    Arlene J Astell;Nicole Bouranis;Jesse Hoey;Allison Lindauer

  • Designing a multimedia conversation aid for reminiscence therapy in dementia care environments

    Gary Gowans;Jim Campbell;Norm Alm;Richard Dye

  • Involving older people with dementia and their carers in designing computer based support systems: some methodological considerations

    Arlene Astell;Norman Alm;Gary Gowans;Maggie Ellis

  • Studies involving people with dementia and touchscreen technology: a literature review

    Phil Joddrell;Arlene J Astell

  • Predictors of Sexual Offence Recidivism in Offenders with Intellectual Disabilities.

    William R. Lindsay;Susanne F. Elliot;Arlene Astell

  • A Communication Support System for Older People with Dementia

    N. Alm;R. Dye;G. Gowans;J. Campbell

  • Older Adults' Perspectives on Using Digital Technology to Maintain Good Mental Health: Interactive Group Study.

    Jacob A. Andrews;Laura J. E. Brown;Mark S. Hawley;Arlene J. Astell;Arlene J. Astell;Arlene J. Astell

  • Tip-of-the-tongue states and lexical access in dementia.

    Arlene J. Astell;Trevor A. Harley

  • Technology and Fun for a Happy Old Age

    Arlene Astell

  • ‘That's for old so and so's!’: does identity influence older adults’ technology adoption decisions?

    Arlene J. Astell;Colleen McGrath;Erica Dove

  • Stimulating people with dementia to reminisce using personal and generic photographs

    Arlene J. Astell;Maggie P. Ellis;Norman Alm;Richard Dye

  • Technology and personhood in dementia care

    Arlene Astell

  • Effects of age, dysphoria, and emotion-focusing on autobiographical memory specificity in children.

    Ronan E. O'Carroll;Ronan E. O'Carroll;Ronan E. O'Carroll;Tim Dalgleish;Tim Dalgleish;Tim Dalgleish;Lyndsey E. Drummond;Lyndsey E. Drummond;Lyndsey E. Drummond;Barbara Dritschel;Barbara Dritschel;Barbara Dritschel

  • The Role of Eye Gaze in Regulating Turn Taking in Conversations: A Systematized Review of Methods and Findings.

    Ziedune Degutyte;Arlene Astell

  • Does familiarity affect the enjoyment of touchscreen games for people with dementia

    Arlene J. Astell;Arlene J. Astell;Phil Joddrell;Hanny Groenewoud;Jacomine de Lange

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex Mihailidis
Alex Mihailidis University of Toronto
Andrew Sixsmith
Andrew Sixsmith Simon Fraser University
Ronan E. O'Carroll
Ronan E. O'Carroll University of Stirling
Tim Dalgleish
Tim Dalgleish University of Cambridge
David W. Kaufman
David W. Kaufman Boston University
Krista L. Lanctôt
Krista L. Lanctôt Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Nikolaos Scarmeas
Nikolaos Scarmeas National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Dimitrios Tzovaras
Dimitrios Tzovaras Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
Mario A. Parra
Mario A. Parra University of Strathclyde
Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities often leads to varied and impactful career options. Many students now choose online programs for greater flexibility and accessibility. For those interested in psychology and counseling, a part time psyd program can be a practical route to becoming a licensed clinical psychologist, allowing you to balance studies with work or family commitments.

If you aim to support families and relationships, accelerated marriage and family therapy programs offer a fast-track option, letting you earn your credentials and start practicing sooner. Likewise, those seeking foundational knowledge and growth in the field can consider getting a masters in psychology, which opens doors to roles in research, human services, and education.

For educators and professionals wishing to advance into leadership or academic roles, 2 year ed d programs online provide a streamlined pathway to a doctorate in education. These online options make it easier for students across the globe to pursue advanced degrees and launch meaningful careers in social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Arlene Astell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles