World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4066 3751 196 187 213 10777

Rose-Marie Dröes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rose-Marie Dröes between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rose-Marie Dröes published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2017. 15 of the 291 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2017. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 7 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications
1998 2025

291 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rose-Marie Dröes: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 2
2000 3
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 7
2005 12
2006 2
2007 19
2008 12
2009 7
2010 14
2011 14
2012 16
2013 5
2014 10
2015 12
2016 15
2017 25
2018 13
2019 16
2020 17
2021 17
2022 18
2023 14
2024 7
2025 8
Total 291
Download as CSV

Rose-Marie Dröes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rose-Marie Dröes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 213 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 213
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rose-Marie Dröes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rose-Marie Dröes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rose-Marie Dröes is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with particular focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Demography, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main topics covered in Dröes's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes, Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Technology Use by Older Adults, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, and Chronic Disease Management Strategies.

Dröes has contributed to numerous publications, frequently collaborating with coauthors such as Teake P. Ettema, David Neal, Franka Meiland, Karin Dijkstra, and Yvonne Kerkhof. The most common venues for their publications are BMC Geriatrics, International Psychogeriatrics, Alzheimer's & Dementia, Aging & Mental Health, and Innovation in Aging.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Toward a theory-based specification of non-pharmacological treatments in aging and dementia: Focused reviews and methodological recommendations (2020), Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Can Use of Digital Technologies by People with Dementia Improve Self-Management and Social Participation? A Systematic Review of Effect Studies (2021), Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Effects of Exergaming on Cognitive and Social Functioning of People with Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial (2020), Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • Impact of the FindMyApps program on people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia and their caregivers; an exploratory pilot randomised controlled trial (2020), Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
  • Limitations of the new ISO standard for health and wellness apps (2022), Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)

Dröes's work is situated primarily within research on aging populations, dementia, and the integration of technology to support health outcomes and patient involvement. Their publications encompass both methodological contributions and randomized controlled trials assessing digital and non-pharmacological interventions.

Best Publications

  • A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care

    E. Moniz-Cook;M. Vernooij-Dassen;R. Woods;F. R. Verhey

  • Multivariate models of subjective caregiver burden in dementia: a systematic review.

    Jacqueline van der Lee;Ton J.E.M. Bakker;Hugo J. Duivenvoorden;Rose-Marie Dröes

  • Review of ICT-Based Services for Identified Unmet Needs in People with Dementia

    S. Lauriks;A. Reinersmann;H.G. Van der Roest;F.J.M. Meiland

  • Technologies to support community-dwelling persons with dementia: A position paper on issues regarding development, usability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, deployment, and ethics

    Franka Meiland;Anthea Innes;Gail Mountain;Louise Robinson

  • Review of ICT-based services for identified unmet needs in people with dementia

    S. Lauriks;A. Reinersmann;H.G. van der Roest;F.J.M. Meiland

  • What do community-dwelling people with dementia need? A survey of those who are known to care and welfare services

    Henriëtte G. van der Roest;Franka J. M. Meiland;Hannie C. Comijs;Els Derksen

  • Suffering from dementia - the patient's perspective: a review of the literature.

    Marike E. De Boer;Cees M.P.M. Hertogh;Rose Marie Dröes;Ingrid I. Riphagen

  • QUALIDEM: development and evaluation of a dementia specific quality of life instrument--validation.

    Teake P. Ettema;Rose Marie Dröes;Jacomine de Lange;Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • QUALIDEM: development and evaluation of a dementia specific quality of life instrument. Scalability, reliability and internal structure

    Teake P. Ettema;Rose Marie Dröes;Jacomine De Lange;Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • A review of quality of life instruments used in dementia

    Teake P. Ettema;Rose-Marie Dröes;Jacomine de Lange;Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • Social health and dementia: a European consensus on the operationalization of the concept and directions for research and practice

    R M Dröes;R Chattat;A Diaz;D Gove

  • Quality of life in dementia in perspective An explorative study of variations in opinions among people with dementia and their professional caregivers, and in literature

    Rose-Marie Dröes;Ellen C.C. Boelens-Van Der Knoop;Joke Bos;Lucinda Meihuizen

  • Effects of combined intervention programmes for people with dementia living at home and their caregivers: a systematic review

    Carolien H.M. Smits;Jacomine De Lange;Rose Marie Dröes;Franka Meiland

  • Subjective needs of people with dementia: a review of the literature.

    Henriëtte G. Van Der Roest;Franka J.M. Meiland;Raffaella Maroccini;Hannie C. Comijs

  • The effect of integrated emotion‐oriented care versus usual care on elderly persons with dementia in the nursing home and on nursing assistants: a randomized clinical trial

    Evelyn Finnema;Rose Marie Dröes;Teake Ettema;Marcel Ooms

  • The effects of emotion-oriented approaches in the care for persons suffering from dementia: a review of the literature.

    Evelyn Finnema;R.M. Dröes;Miel Ribbe;W van Tilburg

  • The concept of quality of life in dementia in the different stages of the disease.

    Teake P. Ettema;Rose-Marie Dröes;Jacomine de Lange;Marcel E. Ooms

  • Web-Based STAR E-Learning Course Increases Empathy and Understanding in Dementia Caregivers: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom

    Bart Hattink;Franka Meiland;Henriëtte van der Roest;Peter Kevern

  • Effect of Meeting Centres Support Program on feelings of competence of family carers and delay of institutionalization of people with dementia.

    Rose Marie Dröes;E. Breebaart;F. J.M. Meiland;W. Van Tilburg

  • Effect of combined support for people with dementia and carers versus regular day care on behaviour and mood of persons with dementia: results from a multi-centre implementation study.

    Rose Marie Dröes;Franka Meiland;Mirjam Schmitz;Willem van Tilburg

Frequent Co-Authors

Joanna Rymaszewska
Joanna Rymaszewska Wrocław University of Science and Technology
Maurice Mulvenna
Maurice Mulvenna University of Ulster
Chris D. Nugent
Chris D. Nugent University of Ulster
David Craig
David Craig University of Southern California
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen
Myrra Vernooij-Dassen Radboud University
Judith E. Bosmans
Judith E. Bosmans Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Gideon J. Mellenbergh
Gideon J. Mellenbergh University of Amsterdam
Julia C.M. van Weert
Julia C.M. van Weert University of Amsterdam
Martin Orrell
Martin Orrell University of Nottingham
Hannie C. Comijs
Hannie C. Comijs VU University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring advanced study options in psychology and counseling can open doors to rewarding career opportunities, especially with the convenience of online education. Many students seek flexible and affordable pathways to earn their credentials, making online master’s programs increasingly popular.

Those interested in counseling will find plenty of options for accredited degrees across the United States. For example, California offers a range of affordable online counseling master's programs in California, ideal for students looking for reputable West Coast institutions. In Florida, you can discover some of the cheapest online counseling master's degrees in Florida, as well as more localized choices like the cheapest online counseling master's degrees in Fort Lauderdale for those in the South Florida region.

If you’re based in the Southeast, consider the affordable online counseling master's programs in Georgia that blend quality with cost-effectiveness. By choosing the right program, you can tailor your studies to your budget and location—ultimately paving the way toward a fulfilling career in psychology, therapy, or school counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Rose-Marie Dröes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles