World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 74 1828 1647 105 100 324 39080

Erik J. A. Scherder publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Erik J. A. Scherder between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Erik J. A. Scherder published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2016. 12 of the 414 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2016. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 29 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications
1992 2025

414 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Erik J. A. Scherder: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 3
1996 0
1997 5
1998 7
1999 14
2000 7
2001 11
2002 10
2003 13
2004 7
2005 21
2006 16
2007 8
2008 22
2009 29
2010 21
2011 11
2012 12
2013 23
2014 15
2015 18
2016 30
2017 19
2018 27
2019 16
2020 7
2021 7
2022 7
2023 14
2024 8
2025 4
Total 414
Download as CSV

Erik J. A. Scherder publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik J. A. Scherder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 324 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76 324
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Erik J. A. Scherder D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erik J. A. Scherder sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169 74
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Erik J. A. Scherder is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research predominantly focuses on the field of Medicine, with particular emphasis on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, General Health Professions, and Sociology and Political Science.

The main topics covered by their work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Music Therapy and Health, Physical Activity and Health, Media Influence and Health, Behavioral Health and Interventions, and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy.

Their recent papers demonstrate engagement with diverse aspects of health and cognitive sciences. Selected publications include:

  • Effects of low- and high-intensity physical exercise on physical and cognitive function in older persons with dementia: a randomized controlled trial (2020), Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • Association of a Public Health Campaign About Coronavirus Disease 2019 Promoted by News Media and a Social Influencer With Self-reported Personal Hygiene and Physical Distancing in the Netherlands (2020), JAMA Network Open
  • A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial (2021), EClinicalMedicine
  • The effects of a moderate physical activity intervention on physical fitness and cognition in healthy elderly with low levels of physical activity: a randomized controlled trial (2023), Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • The impact of pain on the course of ADL functioning in patients with dementia (2020), Age and Ageing

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Erik J. A. Scherder include Leonard Hofstra, Sietske A.M. Sikkes, H. Yousuf, Jagat Narula, and Maarten V. Milders.

The researcher has been published regularly in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Alzheimer s Research & Therapy, JAMA Network Open, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, and BMC Geriatrics, reflecting the focus on neurodegenerative diseases and associated interventions.

Best Publications

  • Special Care Units and Traditional Care in Dementia: Relationship with Behavior, Cognition, Functional Status and Quality of Life - A Review

    Jeroen S. Kok;Ina J. Berg;Erik J.A. Scherder

  • Physical exercise and executive functions in preadolescent children, adolescents and young adults: a meta-analysis

    Lot Verburgh;Marsh Königs;Erik J A Scherder;Jaap Oosterlaan

  • The effect of physical activity on cognitive function in patients with dementia: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials

    C. Groot;A.M. Hooghiemstra;P.G.H.M. Raijmakers;B.N.M. van Berckel

  • Executive Functioning in Highly Talented Soccer Players

    Lot Verburgh;Erik J. A. Scherder;Paul A.M. van Lange;Jaap Oosterlaan

  • Reduced Self-Control after 3 Months of Imprisonment; A Pilot Study.

    Jesse Meijers;Joke M. Harte;Gerben Meynen;Gerben Meynen;Pim Cuijpers

  • Pain management in patients with dementia.

    Wilco P Achterberg;Marjoleine J C Pieper;Annelore H van Dalen-Kok;Margot W M de Waal

  • Review of effects of physical activity on strength, balance, mobility and ADL performance in elderly subjects with dementia.

    Christiaan G. Blankevoort;Marieke J. G. van Heuvelen;Froukje Boersma;Helga Luning

  • On the Relationship between Motor Performance and Executive Functioning in Children with Intellectual Disabilities.

    Esther Hartman;Suzanne Houwen;Erik Scherder;Chris Visscher

  • Pain processing in dementia and its relation to neuropathology

    Erik J A Scherder;Joseph A Sergeant;Dick F Swaab

  • Gait in ageing and associated dementias; its relationship with cognition

    Erik Scherder;Laura Eggermont;Dick Swaab;Marieke van Heuvelen

  • Recent developments in pain in dementia

    Erik Scherder;Joukje Oosterman;Dick Swaab;Keela Herr

  • Motor performance of children with mild intellectual disability and borderline intellectual functioning

    P. J. Vuijk;Esther Hartman;E. Scherder;Chris Visscher

  • Physical activity and executive functions in the elderly with mild cognitive impairment

    E. J. A. Scherder;J. Van Paasschen;J.-B. Deijen;S. Van Der Knokke

  • Longitudinal Analysis of Music Education on Executive Functions in Primary School Children

    Artur C. Jaschke;Artur C. Jaschke;Henkjan Honing;Erik J. A. Scherder

  • A 9-week aerobic and strength training program improves cognitive and motor function in patients with dementia: a randomized, controlled trial

    Willem J.R. Bossers;Lucas H.V. van der Woude;Froukje Boersma;Tibor Hortobágyi

  • Circadian and age-related modulation of thermoreception and temperature regulation: mechanisms and functional implications.

    Eus J W Van Someren;Roy J E M Raymann;Erik J A Scherder;Hein A M Daanen

  • Mastication for the mind-The relationship between mastication and cognition in ageing and dementia

    R.A.F. Weijenberg;E.J.A. Scherder;F. Lobbezoo

  • Frail Institutionalized Older Persons: A Comprehensive Review on Physical Exercise, Physical Fitness, Activities of Daily Living, and Quality-of-Life

    Elizabeth Weening-Dijksterhuis;Mathieu H. G. de Greef;Erik J. A. Scherder;Joris P. J. Slaets

  • Visual analogue scales for pain assessment in Alzheimer's disease.

    Erik J.A. Scherder;Anke Bouma

  • Motor-skill learning in Alzheimer's disease: a review with an eye to the clinical practice

    Ilse A. D. A. van Halteren-van Tilborg;Erik J. A. Scherder;Wouter Hulstijn;Wouter Hulstijn

  • Pain in Dementia

    Erik Scherder;Keela Herr;Gisèle Pickering;Stephen Gibson

Frequent Co-Authors

Dick F. Swaab
Dick F. Swaab Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
Frank Lobbezoo
Frank Lobbezoo Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam
Philip Scheltens
Philip Scheltens Amsterdam UMC
Anke Bouma
Anke Bouma University of Groningen
Eus J.W. Van Someren
Eus J.W. Van Someren Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Hannie C. Comijs
Hannie C. Comijs VU University Medical Center
Carlo Schuengel
Carlo Schuengel Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jaap Oosterlaan
Jaap Oosterlaan University of Amsterdam
Heleen M. Evenhuis
Heleen M. Evenhuis Erasmus University Rotterdam
Chris Visscher
Chris Visscher University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens numerous career pathways, especially in counseling and therapy. However, the requirements for practicing as a licensed counselor or therapist often vary by state and city. Understanding these specific regulations is vital for students considering an online degree in psychology or a related field.

For example, if you're interested in working in Washington, DC, you will need to meet the Washington DC licensed therapist requirements, which include specific educational credentials and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, those aiming to practice in Kansas should review the Wichita licensed therapist requirements.

In North Carolina, meeting the Winston Salem licensed therapist requirements is essential, while aspiring substance abuse counselors in New Mexico should explore the steps involved in how to become a substance abuse counselor in Albuquerque.

Online degrees in psychology or counseling can provide foundational knowledge and flexibility, but always verify local licensing requirements in your desired location to ensure a smooth career journey.

Best Scientists Citing Erik J. A. Scherder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles