World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gideon J. Mellenbergh

Gideon J. Mellenbergh

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
12723
World Ranking
3778
National Ranking
156

Gideon J. Mellenbergh publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gideon J. Mellenbergh sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Gideon J. Mellenbergh D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gideon J. Mellenbergh sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gideon J. Mellenbergh was affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. The academic career was focused on research and teaching within this institution.

There are no specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed fields and subfields of study recorded from the available data. Likewise, no specific main topics of work or awards have been documented.

The profile thus reflects only that the individual was a researcher linked primarily to the University of Amsterdam and is now deceased. This indicates that the contributions to the academic community were made in the past.

Best Publications

  • The concept of validity

    Denny Borsboom;Gideon J. Mellenbergh;Jaap van Heerden

  • The theoretical status of latent variables

    Denny Borsboom;Gideon J. Mellenbergh;Jaap van Heerden

  • Advising on research methods: A consultant's companion

    Herman J. Adèr;Gideon J. Mellenbergh;David J. Hand

  • Item bias and item response theory

    Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • Metric Scaling: Correspondence Analysis

    Constantino Arce;Gideon J. Mellenbergh;Susan C. Weller;A. Kimball Romney

  • Contingency Table Models for Assessing Item Bias

    Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • QUALIDEM: development and evaluation of a dementia specific quality of life instrument--validation.

    Teake P. Ettema;Rose Marie Dröes;Jacomine de Lange;Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • QUALIDEM: development and evaluation of a dementia specific quality of life instrument. Scalability, reliability and internal structure

    Teake P. Ettema;Rose Marie Dröes;Jacomine De Lange;Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • A review of quality of life instruments used in dementia

    Teake P. Ettema;Rose-Marie Dröes;Jacomine de Lange;Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • Generalized linear item response theory.

    Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • Social functioning in children with a chronic illness.

    Susan A. Meijer;Gerben Sinnema;Jan O. Bijstra;Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • Coping styles and locus of control as predictors for psychological adjustment of adolescents with a chronic illness.

    Susan A Meijer;Gerben Sinnema;Jan O Bijstra;Gideon J Mellenbergh

  • Risk and preventive factors for cot death in The Netherlands, a low-incidence country.

    M. P. L'Hoir;A. C. Engelberts;G. T. J. van Well;S. McClelland

  • Nonprobability Sampling

    Unknown

  • The concept of quality of life in dementia in the different stages of the disease.

    Teake P. Ettema;Rose-Marie Dröes;Jacomine de Lange;Marcel E. Ooms

  • On the relationship between sources of within- and between-group differences and measurement invariance in the common factor model

    Gitta H. Lubke;Conor V. Dolan;Henk Kelderman;Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • A Unidimensional Latent Trait Model for Continuous Item Responses.

    Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • Effect of Meeting Centres Support Program on feelings of competence of family carers and delay of institutionalization of people with dementia.

    Rose Marie Dröes;E. Breebaart;F. J.M. Meiland;W. Van Tilburg

  • Conceptual Notes on Models for Discrete Polytomous Item Responses

    Gideon J. Mellenbergh

  • DSM‐IV Internal Construct Validity: When a Taxonomy Meets Data

    Catharina A. Hartman;Joop Hox;Gideon J. Mellenbergh;Michael H. Boyle

  • Mathematical and Analytical Aspects of Tracking

    J. W. R. Twisk;H. C. G. Kemper;G. J. Mellenbergh

Frequent Co-Authors

Denny Borsboom
Denny Borsboom University of Amsterdam
Rose-Marie Dröes
Rose-Marie Dröes University of Amsterdam
Jos W. R. Twisk
Jos W. R. Twisk Amsterdam UMC
Conor V. Dolan
Conor V. Dolan Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Frits A. Beemer
Frits A. Beemer Utrecht University
Joop J. Hox
Joop J. Hox Utrecht University
Catharina A. Hartman
Catharina A. Hartman University Medical Center Groningen
Han L. J. van der Maas
Han L. J. van der Maas University of Amsterdam
Peter C. M. Molenaar
Peter C. M. Molenaar Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to flexible and affordable online degree options. For those interested in mental health or human behavior, many masters programs in psychology let you gain specialized knowledge and prepare for a wide range of careers. These online programs are designed to fit around your schedule and budget, making advanced study more accessible.

If you’re aiming for leadership or academic roles, 1 year edd programs online deliver a fast-track pathway to a doctorate in education. For those who want to earn an advanced credential quickly, there are also 1 year master's programs in fields like sociology, public administration, or communications. These accelerated options allow you to swiftly upskill while balancing work and life.

Undergraduates can benefit from accelerated bachelor's degree online accredited programs, which allow completion in less time than traditional degrees. These flexible online pathways make it easier to launch your career or to continue onto postgraduate studies in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Gideon J. Mellenbergh