World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
21164
World Ranking
2794
National Ranking
1612

Mark Wilson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wilson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 246 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark Wilson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wilson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Wilson is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within education, with a particular emphasis on assessment methodologies and the philosophy and history of science.

Their recent papers include:

  • Validation of a digital tool for diagnosing mathematical proficiency, 2020, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
  • Development of an assessment tool for mathematical reading, analytical thinking and mathematical writing, 2020, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
  • Developing an assessment framework of multidimensional scientific competencies, 2020, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
  • Improving Learning: Using a Learning Progression to Coordinate Instruction and Assessment, 2021, Frontiers in Education
  • Designing and verifying a tool for diagnosing scientific misconceptions in genetics topic, 2020, International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Mark Wilson include:

  • Luca Mari
  • Andrew Maul
  • Perman Gochyyev
  • Jennifer Mittelstadt
  • Putcharee Junpeng

The primary venues where their work has been published are:

  • Harvard Dataverse
  • International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE)
  • Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability
  • Frontiers in Education
  • Applied Measurement in Education

Mark Wilson's research covers a broad array of subfields including:

  • Education
  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

The main topics of their work are:

  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Educational Assessment and Improvement
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies

Best Publications

  • Constructing Measures : An Item Response Modeling Approach

    Mark Wilson

  • The Multidimensional Random Coefficients Multinomial Logit Model

    Raymond J. Adams;Mark Wilson;Wen-chung Wang

  • Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior : exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample

    Jacqueline Frick;Florian G. Kaiser;Mark Wilson

  • Explanatory item response models : a generalized linear and nonlinear approach

    Paul de Boeck;Mark Wilson

  • Explanatory Item Response Models

    Paul De Boeck;Sun-Joo Cho;Mark Wilson

  • Goal-directed conservation behavior: the specific composition of a general performance

    Florian G. Kaiser;Mark Wilson

  • From Principles to Practice: An Embedded Assessment System

    Mark Wilson;Kathryn Sloane

  • A Competence Model for Environmental Education

    Nina Roczen;Nina Roczen;Florian G. Kaiser;Franz X. Bogner;Mark Wilson

  • Flunking Grades: Research and Policies on Retention

    Mark Wilson;L. A. Shepard;M. L. Smith

  • Diagnostic Assessment with Ordered Multiple-Choice Items

    Derek C. Briggs;Alicia C. Alonzo;Cheryl Schwab;Mark Wilson

  • Measuring Progressions: Assessment Structures Underlying a Learning Progression

    Mark Wilson

  • Multilevel item response models: An approach to errors in variables regression

    Raymond J. Adams;Mark Wilson;Margaret Wu

  • Assessing people's general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural measure

    Florian G. Kaiser;Mark Wilson

  • The Rasch Testlet Model

    Wen-Chung Wang;Mark Wilson

  • An introduction to multidimensional measurement using Rasch models.

    Derek C Briggs;Mark Wilson

  • Developing Assessments for the Next Generation Science Standards.

    James W. Pellegrino;Mark R. Wilson;Judith A. Koenig;Alexandra S. Beatty

  • Objective measurement : theory into practice

    Mark Wilson;George Engelhard;Karen Draney

  • Systems for State Science Assessment

    Mark R. Wilson;Meryl W. Bertenthal

  • Unfair Treatment? The Case of Freedle, the SAT, and the Standardization Approach to Differential Item Functioning

    Maria Veronica Santelices;Mark Wilson

  • Saltus: A psychometric model of discontinuity in cognitive development.

    Mark Wilson

  • ACER conquest: generalised item response modelling software

    Margaret L Wu;Ray J Adams;M R Wilson

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul De Boeck
Paul De Boeck The Ohio State University
Gary D. Lopaschuk
Gary D. Lopaschuk University of Alberta
Jason R.B. Dyck
Jason R.B. Dyck University of Alberta
Florian G. Kaiser
Florian G. Kaiser Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Robert J. Mislevy
Robert J. Mislevy University of Maryland, College Park
Ou Lydia Liu
Ou Lydia Liu Princeton University
Paul Black
Paul Black King's College London
Lazar Stankov
Lazar Stankov University of Sydney
Angelica M. Stacy
Angelica M. Stacy University of California, Berkeley
Sharon M. Hall
Sharon M. Hall University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and rewarding career pathways, especially in the field of counseling. Aspiring Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs) can benefit from flexible online programs that meet state-specific requirements.

Licensure requirements can vary widely between states, making it important to understand the process in your location. For example, if you plan to practice in Florida, you’ll need to learn how to get an lpc license in Florida, which involves specific education, supervised experience, and examination steps. Similarly, professionals interested in Georgia must consider how to get an lpc license in Georgia with its own unique criteria and documentation.

States such as Hawaii and Idaho have their own guidelines. Prospective counselors should review how to get an lpc license in Hawaii and Idaho lpc licensure requirements to ensure a clear path to licensure.

By choosing an accredited online psychology degree, students can prepare for licensure across the country, making it vital to research and match your program to the state requirements where you plan to work.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Wilson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles