World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ronny Scherer

Ronny Scherer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6141 5707 44 41 121 9774

Ronny Scherer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ronny Scherer between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ronny Scherer published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2021. 31 of the 198 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2021. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 21 publications
1994 2025

198 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ronny Scherer: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 1
2012 1
2013 2
2014 7
2015 12
2016 18
2017 19
2018 11
2019 11
2020 15
2021 29
2022 24
2023 16
2024 10
2025 21
Total 198
Download as CSV

Ronny Scherer publications per year - data summary

  • Ronny Scherer, a Psychology scholar from University of Oslo, has 198 publications recorded across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1994 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 29 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1994, 2011 and 2012, with 1 publication each.
  • 16 of the 32 years in the span carry no publications at all (1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 12.4 per year counting only the 16 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 100 publications, 51% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1994-2004: 1 publication (0.1 per year); 2005-2015: 23 publications (2.1 per year); 2016-2025: 174 publications (17.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ronny Scherer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronny Scherer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 121
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ronny Scherer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Ronny Scherer, a Psychology scholar from University of Oslo, records 121 publications - the 33rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 33% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Ronny Scherer, and about 67% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Ronny Scherer ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Ronny Scherer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronny Scherer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Ronny Scherer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Ronny Scherer, a Psychology scholar from University of Oslo, records 47 D-Index - the 47th percentile of the discipline.
  • 47% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Ronny Scherer, and about 53% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Ronny Scherer ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Ronny Scherer is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway and conducts research primarily in the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Their work spans several subfields including Education, Information Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computer Science Applications, and Gender Studies.

Their research topics cover a broad range of themes such as:

  • Gender and Technology in Education
  • Digital literacy in education
  • Online and Blended Learning
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • School Choice and Performance
  • Child Development and Digital Technology

Ronny Scherer has contributed to multiple publication venues with a notable frequency in:

  • Computers & Education
  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Large-scale Assessments in Education
  • Educational Research Review
  • Education and Information Technologies

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Profiling teachers' readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who's ready?" (2020) in Computers in Human Behavior
  • "A meta-analysis of teaching and learning computer programming: Effective instructional approaches and conditions" (2020) in Computers in Human Behavior

Frequent co-authors that Ronny Scherer has worked with include:

  • Fazilat Siddiq
  • Diego Campos
  • Samuel Greiff
  • Jo Tondeur
  • Sarah Howard

Best Publications

  • The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education

    Ronny Scherer;Fazilat Siddiq;Jo Tondeur

  • Students' self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes.

    Malte Jansen;Ronny Scherer;Ulrich Schroeders

  • Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education

    Jo Tondeur;Ronny Scherer;Evrim Baran;Fazilat Siddiq

  • Teachers' emphasis on developing students' digital information and communication skills (TEDDICS): A new construct in 21st century education

    Fazilat Siddiq;Ronny Scherer;Jo Tondeur

  • The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers' technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches

    Ronny Scherer;Jo Tondeur;Fazilat Siddiq;Evrim Baran

  • Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students' ICT literacy

    Fazilat Siddiq;Ronny Scherer

  • The role of ICT self-efficacy for students' ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test

    Anubha Rohatgi;Ronny Scherer;Ove E. Hatlevik

  • Taking a future perspective by learning from the past – A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy

    Fazilat Siddiq;Ove Edvard Hatlevik;Rolf Vegar Olsen;Inger Throndsen

  • Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use

    Jo Tondeur;Johan van Braak;Fazilat Siddiq;Ronny Scherer

  • Unpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology: A meta-analysis

    Ronny Scherer;Timothy Teo

  • Becoming more specific

    Ronny Scherer;Fazilat Siddiq;Timothy Teo

  • Teachers’ Agency and Online Education in Times of Crisis

    Crina I. Damsa;Malcolm Langford;Dan Uehara;Ronny Scherer

  • A comprehensive investigation of TPACK within pre-service teachers’ ICT profiles: Mind the gap!

    Jo Tondeur;Ronny Scherer;Fazilat Siddiq;Evrim Baran

  • The cognitive benefits of learning computer programming: A meta-analysis of transfer effects.

    Ronny Scherer;Fazilat Siddiq;Bárbara Sánchez Viveros

  • On the quest for validity: Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the technology-dimensions in the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model

    Ronny Scherer;Jo Tondeur;Fazilat Siddiq

  • Revisiting teachers' computer self-efficacy

    Ronny Scherer;Fazilat Siddiq

  • Understanding students' performance in a computer-based assessment of complex problem solving

    Samuel Greiff;Christoph Niepel;Ronny Scherer;Romain Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Jo Tondeur
Jo Tondeur Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Timothy Teo
Timothy Teo Chinese University of Hong Kong
Katharina Scheiter
Katharina Scheiter University of Potsdam
Paul A. Kirschner
Paul A. Kirschner Open University in the Netherlands
Jan-Eric Gustafsson
Jan-Eric Gustafsson University of Gothenburg
Monica Melby-Lervåg
Monica Melby-Lervåg University of Oslo
Charles Hulme
Charles Hulme University of Oxford
Arthur C. Graesser
Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis
Johan van Braak
Johan van Braak Ghent University
Jean-François Rouet
Jean-François Rouet University of Poitiers

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens various online learning and career options. Many students consider specializing in areas like mental health counseling or therapy, which require both academic credentials and state licensure. Online psychology programs offer flexible study paths, making it possible to balance coursework with personal or professional commitments.

Licensure requirements can differ widely by location. For example, to understand the process in the northeast, see how to become a licensed therapist in Philadelphia. If you are considering the southwest, review the licensed therapist requirements in Phoenix. In the Midwest, it is important to know the Pittsburgh licensed therapist education requirements. For those interested in Texas, get insights on becoming a licensed therapist in Plano.

Whether you aim for clinical practice, school counseling, or research roles, knowing your local requirements and accredited pathways is crucial. Online degrees can help you start – or advance – your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Ronny Scherer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles