What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Lung
- Cardiology
His primary areas of study are Internal medicine, Cardiology, Physical exercise, Endocrinology and Cardiac output.
His Internal medicine course of study focuses on Surgery and Respiratory disease.
He has researched Cardiology in several fields, including Physical therapy, Lung, Respiratory system and Heart rate.
Blood flow is closely connected to Anatomy in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Endocrinology.
His Cardiac output study contributes to a more complete understanding of Anesthesia.
Peter D. Wagner usually deals with Ventilation/perfusion ratio and limits it to topics linked to Arterial blood and Supine position.
His most cited work include:
- Measurement of continuous distributions of ventilation-perfusion ratios: theory (722 citations)
- Muscle O2 uptake kinetics in humans: implications for metabolic control (526 citations)
- Myoglobin O2 desaturation during exercise. Evidence of limited O2 transport. (516 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Peter D. Wagner mainly focuses on Internal medicine, Cardiology, Endocrinology, Anesthesia and Cardiac output.
His Internal medicine study frequently links to adjacent areas such as Surgery.
His research integrates issues of Breathing and Physical therapy in his study of Cardiology.
His Endocrinology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Basic fibroblast growth factor, Angiogenesis, Vascular endothelial growth factor and Anatomy.
His Anesthesia research incorporates themes from Lung, Perfusion and Respiratory system.
His Cardiac output study combines topics in areas such as Arterial blood and Heart rate.
He most often published in these fields:
- Internal medicine (46.19%)
- Cardiology (24.42%)
- Endocrinology (21.24%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?
- Internal medicine (46.19%)
- Cardiology (24.42%)
- COPD (10.80%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Peter D. Wagner mostly deals with Internal medicine, Cardiology, COPD, Endocrinology and Skeletal muscle.
His research in Internal medicine intersects with topics in Oxygen transport and Anatomy.
While the research belongs to areas of Cardiology, Peter D. Wagner spends his time largely on the problem of Physical therapy, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Comorbidity.
His COPD research includes elements of Work of breathing, Respiratory system, Blood flow and Heliox.
His work deals with themes such as Hemoglobin and Exercise capacity, which intersect with Endocrinology.
The Cardiac output study combines topics in areas such as Surgery, Pulmonary Diffusing Capacity, Lung and Arterial blood.
Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: update on limb muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (495 citations)
- Gas Exchange and Pulmonary Vascular Reactivity in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis1–4 (182 citations)
- Ventilation-perfusion inequality in asymptomatic asthma. (132 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Gene
- Lung
His primary areas of investigation include Internal medicine, Cardiac output, Endocrinology, COPD and Cardiology.
His study in Anatomy extends to Internal medicine with its themes.
His Cardiac output research incorporates elements of Ventilation/perfusion ratio, Breathing, Alveolar–arterial gradient and Respiratory quotient.
The various areas that he examines in his Endocrinology study include Low oxygen, Surgery and Antioxidant.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Blood flow, Bioinformatics, Systems medicine, Physical therapy and Comorbidity.
His work in Cardiology addresses subjects such as Work rate, which are connected to disciplines such as Submaximal exercise and Oxygen metabolism.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
