World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
31526
World Ranking
13987
National Ranking
199

Jose A. L. Calbet publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose A. L. Calbet sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 348 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jose A. L. Calbet D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jose A. L. Calbet sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jose A. L. Calbet is affiliated with the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria in Spain. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with a specialization in physiology, orthopedics and sports medicine, complementary and alternative medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and rehabilitation.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
  • Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Sports injuries and prevention

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Jose A. L. Calbet include Marcos Martín-Rincón, Robert Boushel, Víctor Galván-Álvarez, Finland, and Jostein Hallén.

Their research has been published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
  • Redox Biology
  • Free Radical Biology and Medicine
  • Acta Physiologica
  • Nutrients

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Jose A. L. Calbet cover several key topics and were published in 2020:

  • "Contribution of oxygen extraction fraction to maximal oxygen uptake in healthy young men," 2020, Acta Physiologica
  • "An integrative approach to the regulation of mitochondrial respiration during exercise: Focus on high-intensity exercise," 2020, Redox Biology
  • "Regulation of Nrf2/Keap1 signalling in human skeletal muscle during exercise to exhaustion in normoxia, severe acute hypoxia and post-exercise ischaemia: Influence of metabolite accumulation and oxygenation," 2020, Redox Biology
  • "Progress Update and Challenges on V.O2max Testing and Interpretation," 2020, Frontiers in Physiology
  • "Mitochondrial oxygen affinity increases after sprint interval training and is related to the improvement in peak oxygen uptake," 2020, Acta Physiologica

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Exercise and Bone Mass in Adults

    Amelia Guadalupe-Grau;Teresa Fuentes;Borja Guerra;Jose A. L. Calbet

  • Reductions in Systemic and Skeletal Muscle Blood Flow and Oxygen Delivery Limit Maximal Aerobic Capacity in Humans

    José González-Alonso;José A.L. Calbet

  • Effects of velocity loss during resistance training on athletic performance, strength gains and muscle adaptations

    F. Pareja-Blanco;D. RodrÍguez-Rosell;L. Sánchez-Medina;J. Sanchis-Moysi

  • Muscle blood flow is reduced with dehydration during prolonged exercise in humans

    José González-Alonso;José A. L. Calbet;Bodil Nielsen

  • Plasma Glucagon and Insulin Responses Depend on the Rate of Appearance of Amino Acids after Ingestion of Different Protein Solutions in Humans

    Jose A. L. Calbet;Dave A. MacLean

  • Convective oxygen transport and fatigue

    Markus Amann;Jose A L Calbet

  • Metabolic and thermodynamic responses to dehydration-induced reductions in muscle blood flow in exercising humans

    José González-Alonso;José A. L. Calbet;Bodil Nielsen

  • Gastric emptying, gastric secretion and enterogastrone response after administration of milk proteins or their peptide hydrolysates in humans

    Jose A. L. Calbet;Jose A. L. Calbet;Jens J. Holst

  • Determinants of maximal oxygen uptake in severe acute hypoxia

    Jose A Calbet;Rob Boushel;Goran Radegran;Hans Sondergaard

  • Role of caloric content on gastric emptying in humans.

    José A.L. Calbet;D.A. MacLean

  • Role of muscle mass on sprint performance: gender differences?

    Jorge Perez-Gomez;German Vicente Rodriguez;Ignacio Ara;Hugo Olmedillas

  • Why do arms extract less oxygen than legs during exercise

    J. A. L. Calbet;H.-C. Holmberg;H. Rosdahl;G. van Hall

  • Point: In health and in a normoxic environment, V̇o2 max is limited primarily by cardiac output and locomotor muscle blood flow

    Bengt Saltin;José A. L. Calbet

  • Regular participation in sports is associated with enhanced physical fitness and lower fat mass in prepubertal boys

    I Ara;G Vicente-Rodríguez;J Jimenez-Ramirez;C Dorado

  • Cycling efficiency and pedalling frequency in road cyclists.

    J. Chavarren;J. A. L. Calbet

  • Anaerobic energy provision does not limit Wingate exercise performance in endurance-trained cyclists.

    J. A. L. Calbet;J. A. De Paz;N. Garatachea;S. Cabeza de Vaca

  • Bone mineral content and density in professional tennis players.

    J. A. L. Calbet;J. S. Moysi;C. Dorado;L. P. Rodríguez

  • Why is VO2 max after altitude acclimatization still reduced despite normalization of arterial O2 content

    Jose A Calbet;Robert Boushel;Goran Radegran;Hans Sondergaard

  • Enhanced bone mass and physical fitness in prepubescent footballers

    G Vicente-Rodriguez;J Jimenez-Ramirez;I Ara;J.A Serrano-Sanchez

Frequent Co-Authors

Bengt Saltin
Bengt Saltin University of Copenhagen
Mikel Izquierdo
Mikel Izquierdo Universidad Publica De Navarra
Peter Krustrup
Peter Krustrup University of Southern Denmark
Jørgen F. P. Wojtaszewski
Jørgen F. P. Wojtaszewski University of Copenhagen
Javier Ibáñez
Javier Ibáñez University of La Rioja
Peter D. Wagner
Peter D. Wagner University of California, San Diego
Jens Bangsbo
Jens Bangsbo University of Copenhagen
Cecilia Gelfi
Cecilia Gelfi University of Milan
Erich Gnaiger
Erich Gnaiger Innsbruck Medical University
Bente Klarlund Pedersen
Bente Klarlund Pedersen University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding or complementing their medical education, a variety of affordable online programs offer alternative pathways into the healthcare sector. These degrees can open doors to specialized careers and help current professionals advance in rapidly evolving fields.

Individuals seeking advanced nursing positions may consider cheap online dnp programs, which allow registered nurses to obtain a Doctor of Nursing Practice without interrupting their careers. Similarly, aspiring pharmacists looking for flexibility and lower tuition costs can benefit from comparing online pharmacy school cost options.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, an online health information management degree can lead to roles in managing patient data and maintaining compliance standards. Another practical option is training in medical billing and coding. Understanding the average cost of medical billing and coding program options helps students find affordable ways to start a career in medical records.

Exploring these online degrees can provide flexibility and cost-saving benefits, making it easier to enter or advance in the healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Jose A. L. Calbet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles