World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
6092
World Ranking
9785
National Ranking
466

Timo Gnambs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timo Gnambs sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Timo Gnambs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timo Gnambs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timo Gnambs is affiliated with the Leibniz Institute for Educational Trajectories in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a strong focus on subfields including Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, and Social Psychology.

Central themes in Gnambs' work include psychometric methodologies and testing, reading and literacy development, behavioral health and interventions, education, achievement and giftedness, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, cognitive abilities and testing, and social and intergroup psychology.

The scientist's recent publications reflect diverse topics and collaborative efforts. Notable papers include:

  • "Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty" (2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • "Attitudes towards AI: measurement and associations with personality" (2024, Scientific Reports)
  • "The development of gender differences in information and communication technology (ICT) literacy in middle adolescence" (2020, Computers in Human Behavior)
  • "Same data, different conclusions: Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis" (2021, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes)
  • "Detecting Careless Responding in Survey Data Using Stochastic Gradient Boosting" (2021, Educational and Psychological Measurement)

Gnambs frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Kathrin Lockl
  • Ulrich Schroeders
  • Markus Appel
  • Claus H. Carstensen
  • Marie-Ann Sengewald

Their work has appeared repeatedly in key publication venues such as:

  • European Journal of Psychological Assessment
  • Assessment
  • Zeitschrift für Psychologie
  • PLoS ONE
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Gnambs has contributed to book publications with titles including:

  • "Hotspots in Psychology 2026" (2024, Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag)
  • "From 'Modern' to 'Postmodern' Psychology: Is There a Way Past?" (2023, Frontiers Media)

Best Publications

  • Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings

    Richard A. Klein;Michelangelo Vianello;Fred Hasselman;Byron G. Adams

  • Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysis

    Timo Gnambs;Kai Kaspar

  • The Transportation Scale–Short Form (TS–SF)

    Markus Appel;Timo Gnambs;Tobias Richter;Melanie C. Green

  • The decline of academic motivation during adolescence: an accelerated longitudinal cohort analysis on the effect of psychological need satisfaction

    Timo Gnambs;Barbara Hanfstingl

  • Personality traits and knowledge sharing in online communities

    Tanja Jadin;Timo Gnambs;Bernad Batinic

  • Are Social Media Ruining Our Lives? A Review of Meta-Analytic Evidence:

    Markus Appel;Caroline Marker;Timo Gnambs;Timo Gnambs

  • Are robots becoming unpopular? Changes in attitudes towards autonomous robotic systems in europe

    Timo Gnambs;Timo Gnambs;Markus Appel

  • A Short Measure of the Need for Affect

    Markus Appel;Timo Gnambs;Gregory Richard Maio

  • Narcissism and Social Networking Behavior: A Meta-Analysis.

    Timo Gnambs;Markus Appel

  • A meta-analysis of dependability coefficients (test–retest reliabilities) for measures of the Big Five

    Timo Gnambs

  • The structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12): two meta-analytic factor analyses

    Timo Gnambs;Thomas Staufenbiel

  • Active on Facebook and Failing at School? Meta-Analytic Findings on the Relationship Between Online Social Networking Activities and Academic Achievement

    Caroline Marker;Caroline Marker;Timo Gnambs;Markus Appel;Markus Appel

  • Color red in web-based knowledge testing

    Timo Gnambs;Markus Appel;Bernad Batinic

  • The upward spiral of adolescents' positive school experiences and happiness: investigating reciprocal effects over time.

    Barbara Stiglbauer;Timo Gnambs;Manuela Gamsjäger;Bernad Batinic

  • The development of gender differences in information and communication technology (ICT) literacy in middle adolescence

    Timo Gnambs;Timo Gnambs

  • Same data, different conclusions : Radical dispersion in empirical results when independent analysts operationalize and test the same hypothesis

    Martin Schweinsberg;Michael Feldman;Nicola Staub;Olmo R. van den Akker

  • Socially Desirable Responding in Web-Based Questionnaires A Meta-Analytic Review of the Candor Hypothesis

    Timo Gnambs;Kai Kaspar

  • A Personality‐Competence Model of Opinion Leadership

    Timo Gnambs;Bernad Batinic

  • The structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: A cross-cultural meta-analysis.

    Timo Gnambs;Anna Scharl;Ulrich Schroeders

  • Cognitive Abilities Explain Wording Effects in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale:

    Timo Gnambs;Ulrich Schroeders

  • Blood lead levels and cognitive functioning: A meta-analysis.

    Thomas Vlasak;Galateja Jordakieva;Timo Gnambs;Christoph Augner

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Bosnjak
Michael Bosnjak University of Trier
Tobias Richter
Tobias Richter University of Würzburg
Gregory R. Maio
Gregory R. Maio University of Bath
Thierry Devos
Thierry Devos San Diego State University
Melanie C. Green
Melanie C. Green University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Brian A. Nosek
Brian A. Nosek Center for Open Science
Liane Young
Liane Young Boston College
Félix Neto
Félix Neto University of Porto
Reginald B. Adams
Reginald B. Adams Pennsylvania State University
Nick Neave
Nick Neave Northumbria University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're passionate about helping others and interested in psychology, social work is a dynamic career pathway to consider. With the growing need for licensed professionals across the country, many turn to online psychology and social work degrees to balance their education with other commitments.

Each U.S. state has unique requirements for licensure, and understanding these differences is crucial. For example, the process for becoming a social worker in Michigan may differ from the steps needed for becoming a social worker in Minnesota, including educational prerequisites and supervised work hours.

Similarly, aspiring professionals interested in becoming a social worker in Mississippi or becoming a social worker in Missouri should review each state's credentialing board for official guidelines. By pursuing online degrees tailored to psychological and social services, you can choose a flexible learning path that fits your schedule while preparing you for a rewarding profession supporting individuals and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Timo Gnambs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles