World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
11976
World Ranking
5173
National Ranking
543

Nick Neave publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Neave sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nick Neave D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Neave sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nick Neave is affiliated with Northumbria University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a focus on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, notably:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Recent publications by Nick Neave include:

  • Home advantage during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analyses of European football leagues, 2021, Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Psychometric assessment of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Conspiracist beliefs, intuitive thinking, and schizotypal facets: A further evaluation, 2020, Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • Digital accumulation behaviours and information management in the workplace: exploring the tensions between digital data hoarding, organisational culture and policy, 2023, Behaviour and Information Technology
  • There Is More Than One Type of Hoarder: Collecting, Managing and Hoarding Digital Data in the Workplace, 2020, Interacting with Computers

The scientist frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • PLoS ONE
  • Behaviour and Information Technology
  • Applied Neuropsychology Adult
  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology

Nick Neave collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Elizabeth Sillence
  • Neil Dagnall
  • Andrew Denovan
  • Kerry McKellar
  • Thomas V. Pollet

Best Publications

  • Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire

    Martin Bruder;Peter Haffke;Nick Neave;Nina Nouripanah

  • Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings

    Richard A. Klein;Michelangelo Vianello;Fred Hasselman;Byron G. Adams

  • Spontaneous object recognition and object location memory in rats: the effects of lesions in the cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cingulum bundle and the fornix

    Abdelkader Ennaceur;Nick Neave;John P. Aggleton

  • Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy

    Hannah Darwin;Nick Neave;Joni Holmes

  • Testosterone, territoriality, and the 'home advantage'.

    Nick Neave;Sandy Wolfson

  • Neurotoxic lesions of the perirhinal cortex do not mimic the behavioural effects of fornix transection in the rat

    Abdelkader Ennaceur;Nick Neave;John Patrick Aggleton

  • Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance.

    Nick Neave;Sarah Laing;Bernhard Fink;John T. Manning

  • Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women.

    Bernhard Fink;Nick Neave;Hanna Seydel

  • Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality

    Bernhard Fink;Nick Neave;John T. Manning;Karl Grammer

  • A comparison of the effects of medial prefrontal, cingulate cortex, and cingulum bundle lesions on tests of spatial memory: evidence of a double dissociation between frontal and cingulum bundle contributions

    John Patrick Aggleton;N. Neave;S. Nagle;A. Sahgal

  • Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: an evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice.

    Sarah Evans;Nick Neave;Delia Wakelin

  • Human pheromones and sexual attraction

    Karl Grammer;Bernhard Fink;Nick Neave

  • Photocopies yield lower digit ratios (2D:4D) than direct finger measurements.

    John T. Manning;Bernhard Fink;Nick Neave;Noreen Caswell

  • The effects of selective lesions within the anterior thalamic nuclei on spatial memory in the rat

    John Patrick Aggleton;P. R. Hunt;S. Nagle;N. Neave

  • Second to fourth digit ratio, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-chest ratio: their relationships in heterosexual men and women

    Bernhard Fink;Nick Neave;John Manning

  • Cognitive Performance, Hyperoxia, and Heart Rate Following Oxygen Administration in Healthy Young Adults

    Andrew B. Scholey;Mark C. Moss;Nick J. Neave;Keith A. Wesnes

  • The relationship between testosterone and vocal frequencies in human males.

    Sarah Evans;Nick Neave;Delia Wakelin;Colin Hamilton

  • A comparison of the effects of anterior thalamic, mamillary body and fornix lesions on reinforced spatial alternation

    John Patrick Aggleton;N. Neave;Sophie Nagle;Peter R. Hunt

  • Second to fourth digit ratio and the 'big five' personality factors

    Bernhard Fink;John T Manning;Nick Neave

  • Sex differences in cognition: the role of testosterone and sexual orientation.

    Nick Neave;Meyrav Menaged;David R. Weightman

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernhard Fink
Bernhard Fink University of Vienna
John T. Manning
John T. Manning Swansea University
John Patrick Aggleton
John Patrick Aggleton Cardiff University
Andrew Scholey
Andrew Scholey Monash University
Keith Wesnes
Keith Wesnes University of Exeter
Karl Grammer
Karl Grammer University of Vienna
Robert W. Kentridge
Robert W. Kentridge Durham University
Roland Imhoff
Roland Imhoff Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Reginald B. Adams
Reginald B. Adams Pennsylvania State University
Yarrow Dunham
Yarrow Dunham Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a diverse array of online education options and specialized career paths. Many students consider becoming licensed therapists or counselors, but requirements for these roles can vary significantly by location.

For example, students interested in becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT) should review the Washington DC mft certification requirements or look into Wichita mft education requirements to understand local expectations for licensure and educational preparation.

In North Carolina, candidates must meet specific mft requirements in Winston Salem, which may differ from other regions. Likewise, those targeting counseling roles should examine the Albuquerque licensed therapist education requirements to plan their academic path.

Before selecting an online degree or specialization, research your intended career’s local licensure guidelines. This ensures your chosen program fits your professional goals and prepares you for state or city-specific credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Nick Neave

Trending Scientists