World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert W. Kentridge

Robert W. Kentridge

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4871
World Ranking
9899
National Ranking
976

Robert W. Kentridge publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Kentridge sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert W. Kentridge D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Kentridge sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert W. Kentridge is affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines within neuroscience and psychology, with particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and social psychology.

Their work often explores topics related to virtual reality applications and impacts, aesthetic perception and analysis, visual perception and processing mechanisms, action observation and synchronization, color science and applications, color perception and design, as well as Pleistocene-era hominins and archaeology.

Frequent coauthors in their research include Paul Pettitt, Simon Thurlbeck, Dorothy Cowie, Rebecca Wedge-Roberts, and Stacey Aston.

They have published in a range of academic venues, with repeated contributions in Cambridge Archaeological Journal, Journal of Vision, and World Archaeology. Other publication venues include Nature Neuroscience and Consciousness and Cognition.

  • An Upper Palaeolithic Proto-writing System and Phenological Calendar (2023, Cambridge Archaeological Journal)
  • My body until proven otherwise: Exploring the time course of the full body illusion (2020, Consciousness and Cognition)
  • What makes a theory of consciousness unscientific? (2025, Nature Neuroscience)
  • Specular highlights improve color constancy when other cues are weakened (2020, Journal of Vision)
  • The deep past in the virtual present: developing an interdisciplinary approach towards understanding the psychological foundations of palaeolithic cave art (2023, Scientific Reports)

Their main fields of study include neuroscience, with a strong emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, and psychology, complementing this with research in subfields such as social psychology and human-computer interaction.

Best Publications

  • Attention without awareness in blindsight

    Robert W. Kentridge;Charles A. Heywood;Lawrence Weiskrantz

  • Eye movement research : mechanisms, processes and applications

    John M. Findlay;Robin Walker;Robert W. Kentridge

  • Spatial attention speeds discrimination without awareness in blindsight.

    Robert W. Kentridge;Charles A. Heywood;Lawrence Weiskrantz

  • Attended but unseen: Visual attention is not sufficient for visual awareness

    R.W. Kentridge;T.C.W. Nijboer;C.A. Heywood

  • Independent contributions of the orienting of attention, fixation offset and bilateral stimulation on human saccadic latencies

    R. Walker;R. W. Kentridge;J. M. Findlay

  • Separate Channels for Processing Form, Texture, and Color: Evidence from fMRI Adaptation and Visual Object Agnosia

    C. Cavina-Pratesi;R.W. Kentridge;C.A. Heywood;A.D. Milner

  • Eye movements when reading disappearing text: Is there a gap effect in reading?

    Simon Paul Liversedge;Keith. Rayner;Sarah.J. White;Dorine. Vergilino-Perez;Dorine. Vergilino-Perez

  • The perception of gloss: A review

    A.C. Chadwick;R.W. Kentridge

  • Object-Based Attention Without Awareness

    Liam J. Norman;Charles A. Heywood;Robert W. Kentridge

  • Separate Processing of Texture and Form in the Ventral Stream: Evidence from fMRI and Visual Agnosia

    C. Cavina-Pratesi;R. W. Kentridge;C. A. Heywood;A. D. Milner

  • Does unconscious perception really exist? Continuing the ASSC20 debate.

    Megan A K Peters;Robert W Kentridge;Ian Phillips;Ned Block

  • The significance of visual information processing in reading: Insights from hemianopic dyslexia

    Susanne Schuett;Charles A. Heywood;Robert W. Kentridge;Josef Zihl

  • Achromatopsia, color vision, and cortex

    Charles A Heywood;Robert W Kentridge

  • Evidence for longevity differences between left handed and right handed men: an archival study of cricketers.

    John P Aggleton;Robert W Kentridge;Nicholas J Neave

  • Metacognition and awareness.

    Robert W. Kentridge;Charles A. Heywood

  • Handedness and Musical Ability: A Study of Professional Orchestral Players, Composers, and Choir Members

    John P. Aggleton;Robert W. Kentridge;James M. M. Good

  • Opportunities and challenges for a maturing science of consciousness

    Matthias Michel;Diane Beck;Ned Block;Hal Blumenfeld

  • Residual vision in multiple retinal locations within a scotoma: Implications for blindsight

    R. W. Kentridge;C. A. Heywood;L. Weiskrantz

  • Consciousness science: real progress and lingering misconceptions

    Ned Block;David Carmel;Stephen M. Fleming;Robert W. Kentridge

  • Visual salience in the change detection paradigm: the special role of object onset.

    Geoff G. Cole;Robert W. Kentridge;Charles A. Heywood

  • Effects of temporal cueing on residual visual discrimination in blindsight

    R.W Kentridge;C.A Heywood;L Weiskrantz

  • Review: The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness:

    Robert W Kentridge

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles A. Heywood
Charles A. Heywood Durham University
John Patrick Aggleton
John Patrick Aggleton Cardiff University
Josef Zihl
Josef Zihl Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Alan Cowey
Alan Cowey University of Oxford
John M. Findlay
John M. Findlay Durham University
Lawrence Weiskrantz
Lawrence Weiskrantz University of Oxford
Melvyn A. Goodale
Melvyn A. Goodale University of Western Ontario
Ned Block
Ned Block New York University
A. David Milner
A. David Milner Durham University
Nick Neave
Nick Neave Northumbria University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to diverse online degrees and flexible career pathways. Online psychology programs can lead to roles such as licensed therapist, counselor, or mental health advocate. Most therapy careers start with a bachelor’s degree, followed by a master’s in counseling or a related field.

State licensure requirements may vary. For instance, you can review the specific Laredo licensed therapist education requirements or learn exactly how to become a licensed therapist in Las Vegas. Practical experience, supervised clinical hours, and passing national exams are often required before applying for licenses.

Each state has unique pathways, so it’s important to research your local criteria. Find more about Lexington licensed therapist requirements or discover what’s needed for the Lincoln licensed therapist requirements to prepare for your future. Online degrees offer convenient, accredited routes to enter these rewarding careers.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Kentridge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles