World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
4746
World Ranking
9590
National Ranking
949

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
4761
World Ranking
9045
National Ranking
666

Robert D. McIntosh publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. McIntosh sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 145 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Robert D. McIntosh D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert D. McIntosh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert D. McIntosh is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Pharmacology, Statistics and Probability, and Rehabilitation.

Their work addresses several main topics including:

  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

McIntosh has a considerable publication record with frequent contributions to the journal Cortex, where they have published 14 papers. Other regular venues include Peer Community In Registered Reports (8 publications), Neuropsychologia (4 publications), Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition (2 publications), and the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2 publications).

Frequent co-authors collaborating with McIntosh include:

  • A.G. Mitchell
  • Stéphanie Rossit (7 publications)
  • Sergio Della Sala (6 publications)
  • Antonia F. Ten Brink (3 publications)
  • Janet H. Bultitude (3 publications)

Recent papers by Robert D. McIntosh demonstrate a range within neuropsychological and cognitive neuroscience research, including:

  • "Power calculations in single-case neuropsychology: A practical primer" (2020, Cortex)
  • "The three R's of scientific integrity: Replicability, reproducibility, and robustness" (2020, Cortex)
  • "Skill and self-knowledge: empirical refutation of the dual-burden account of the Dunning-Kruger effect" (2022, Royal Society Open Science)

Best Publications

  • Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action

    Thomas Schenk;Robert D. McIntosh

  • Grasping the past. delay can improve visuomotor performance.

    A.D Milner;H.C Dijkerman;L Pisella;R.D McIntosh

  • Delayed reaching and grasping in patients with optic ataxia.

    A.D. Milner;H.C. Dijkerman;R.D. McIntosh;Y. Rossetti

  • Registered Reports: Realigning incentives in scientific publishing

    Christopher D. Chambers;Zoltan Dienes;Robert D. McIntosh;Pia Rotshtein

  • Visually guided reaching: bilateral posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from fast visuomotor to slow cognitive control

    Y Rossetti;P Revol;Robert McIntosh;L Pisella

  • Prism adaptation improves chronic visual and haptic neglect: a single case study.

    Robert D. McIntosh;Yves Rossetti;A. David Milner

  • Automatic avoidance of obstacles is a dorsal stream function: evidence from optic ataxia

    Igor Schindler;Nichola J Rice;Robert D McIntosh;Yves Rossetti;Yves Rossetti

  • Improving the clinical diagnosis of personal neglect: a reformulated comb and razor test.

    Robert D. McIntosh;Eric E. Brodie;Nicoletta Beschin;Ian H. Robertson

  • Sensorimotor effects on central space representation: prism adaptation influences haptic and visual representations in normal subjects.

    M. Girardi;R.D. McIntosh;C. Michel;G. Vallar

  • The neurological basis of visual neglect

    A Milner;Robert McIntosh

  • Monocular and binocular distance cues: insights from visual form agnosia I (of III)

    Mark Mon-Williams;James R. Tresilian;Robert D. McIntosh;David A. Milner

  • Irlen Colored Overlays Do not Alleviate Reading Difficulties

    Stuart J Ritchie;Sergio Della Sala;Robert D McIntosh

  • Two visual streams for perception and action: Current trends.

    Robert D. McIntosh;Thomas Schenk

  • Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation

    H. Chris Dijkerman;Robert D. McIntosh;Robert D. McIntosh;A. David Milner;Yves Rossetti

  • Saccadic inhibition underlies the remote distractor effect

    Antimo Buonocore;Antimo Buonocore;Robert D. McIntosh

  • Intact automatic avoidance of obstacles in patients with visual form agnosia

    Nichola J. Rice;Nichola J. Rice;Robert D. McIntosh;Igor Schindler;Mark Mon-Williams

  • Matching boxes: familiar size influences action programming.

    Robert D. McIntosh;Gavin Lashley

  • Choosing between alternative wrist postures: Action planning needs perception

    H. C. Dijkerman;Robert McIntosh;I. Schindler;T. C. W. Nijboer

  • Wise up: Clarifying the role of metacognition in the Dunning-Kruger effect.

    Robert D. McIntosh;Elizabeth A. Fowler;Tianjiao Lyu;Sergio Della Sala

  • Exploratory reports: A new article type for Cortex.

    Robert D. McIntosh

  • Rise and fall of the two visual systems theory.

    Yves Rossetti;Laure Pisella;Robert D. McIntosh

  • Dorsal stream areas process action semantics

    Michiel van Elk;Hein T van Schie;Harold Bekkering

Frequent Co-Authors

Sergio Della Sala
Sergio Della Sala University of Edinburgh
A. David Milner
A. David Milner Durham University
Yves Rossetti
Yves Rossetti Lyon Neuroscience Research Center
Mark Mon-Williams
Mark Mon-Williams University of Leeds
H. Chris Dijkerman
H. Chris Dijkerman Utrecht University
Laure Pisella
Laure Pisella Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Monika Harvey
Monika Harvey University of Glasgow
Michael Hornberger
Michael Hornberger University of East Anglia
James R. Tresilian
James R. Tresilian University of Warwick
Caroline Tilikete
Caroline Tilikete Hospices Civils de Lyon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in neuroscience opens doors to diverse fields such as mental health, research, and private practice. Many students pursue graduate credentials after completing their neuroscience studies. Those interested in clinical psychology can consider psyd online programs for advanced, practice-oriented training.

Alternatively, specializing as a marriage and family therapist is another rewarding route. Accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited provide flexible options for students who want to make a difference in families’ mental and emotional well-being.

Students aiming for a quicker entry into the workforce may look at accelerated bachelors degrees, which can help you complete your undergraduate studies faster and start your career or graduate school sooner.

Importantly, choosing a degree path that balances your interests with long-term professional prospects is key. For those considering earning potential, you can explore high paying degrees to align your educational goals with strong job opportunities in today’s market.

Best Scientists Citing Robert D. McIntosh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles