World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 4082 3767 437 414 164 9316

Aikaterini Fotopoulou publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aikaterini Fotopoulou between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aikaterini Fotopoulou published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 15 of the 203 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

203 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aikaterini Fotopoulou: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 0
2006 0
2007 2
2008 6
2009 5
2010 9
2011 3
2012 11
2013 11
2014 10
2015 14
2016 11
2017 8
2018 15
2019 13
2020 6
2021 23
2022 13
2023 14
2024 12
2025 14
2026 1
Total 203
Download as CSV

Aikaterini Fotopoulou publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aikaterini Fotopoulou sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 164 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 164
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Aikaterini Fotopoulou D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aikaterini Fotopoulou sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Aikaterini Fotopoulou is a researcher affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a focus on a range of subfields including Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The topics addressed in their research include:

  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Their recent publications demonstrate an ongoing engagement with psychological and neuroscientific themes:

  • "Social touch deprivation during COVID-19: effects on psychological wellbeing and craving interpersonal touch," 2021, Royal Society Open Science
  • "Effects of route of administration on oxytocin-induced changes in regional cerebral blood flow in humans," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Gender and geographical disparity in editorial boards of journals in psychology and neuroscience," 2022, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Damage to the right insula disrupts the perception of affective touch," 2020, eLife
  • "Affective regulation through touch: homeostatic and allostatic mechanisms," 2021, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Frequent collaborators with whom Fotopoulou has published multiple times include Paul M. Jenkinson, Laura Crucianelli, Athanasios Koukoutsakis, Valentina Moro, and Mariana Von Mohr.

Fotopoulou's research is published predominantly in journals such as Nature Communications, Scientific Reports, Brain Communications, Cognition, and Neuropsychologia. These venues indicate a consistent presence in both psychology and neuroscience literature.

Best Publications

  • Mentalizing homeostasis: The social origins of interoceptive inference

    Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Manos Tsakiris

  • Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects

    Manos Tsakiris;Lewis Carpenter;Dafydd James;Aikaterini Fotopoulou

  • ‘Bodily precision’: a predictive coding account of individual differences in interoceptive accuracy

    Vivien Ainley;Matthew A. J. Apps;Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Manos Tsakiris

  • The social modulation of pain: others as predictive signals of salience - a systematic review.

    Charlotte Krahé;Anne Springer;John A. Weinman;Aikaterini Fotopoulou

  • Why empathy has a beneficial impact on others in medicine: unifying theories.

    Jean Decety;Aikaterini Fotopoulou

  • Bodily pleasure matters: velocity of touch modulates body ownership during the rubber hand illusion.

    Laura Crucianelli;Nicola K Metcalf;Aikaterini Katerina Fotopoulou;Paul M Jenkinson

  • Looking into myself: changes in interoceptive sensitivity during mirror self-observation.

    Vivien Ainley;Ana Tajadura-Jiménez;Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Manos Tsakiris

  • A Spatiotemporal Profile of In Vivo Cerebral Blood Flow Changes Following Intranasal Oxytocin in Humans

    Yannis Paloyelis;Orla M. Doyle;Fernando O. Zelaya;Stefanos Maltezos

  • The soothing function of touch: affective touch reduces feelings of social exclusion.

    Mariana von Mohr;Louise P. Kirsch;Aikaterini Fotopoulou

  • Interoceptive Ingredients of Body Ownership: Affective Touch and Cardiac Awareness in the Rubber Hand Illusion

    Laura Crucianelli;Laura Crucianelli;Charlotte Krahé;Paul M Jenkinson;Aikaterini Katerina Fotopoulou

  • The role of motor intention in motor awareness: an experimental study on anosognosia for hemiplegia

    Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Manos Tsakiris;Patrick Haggard;Angelique Vagopoulou

  • Implicit awareness in anosognosia for hemiplegia: unconscious interference without conscious re-representation.

    Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Simone Pernigo;Rino Maeda;Anthony Rudd

  • The perception of affective touch in anorexia nervosa

    Laura Crucianelli;Valentina Cardi;Janet Treasure;Paul M. Jenkinson

  • Alexithymia in Neurological Disease: A Review

    Lucia Ricciardi;Benedetta Demartini;Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Mark J. Edwards

  • Wishful reality distortions in confabulation: a case report.

    Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Mark Solms;Mark Solms;Oliver Turnbull

  • Neurobiology of functional (psychogenic) movement disorders

    Mark J. Edwards;Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Isabel Pareés

  • Knowing you care: effects of perceived empathy and attachment style on pain perception.

    Chiara F. Sambo;Matthew Howard;Michael Kopelman;Steven Williams

  • Mirror-view reverses somatoparaphrenia: Dissociation between first- and third-person perspectives on body ownership

    Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Paul Mark Jenkinson;Manos Tsakiris;Patrick Haggard

  • Self-observation reinstates motor awareness in anosognosia for hemiplegia.

    Aikaterini Fotopoulou;Anthony Rudd;Paul Holmes;Michael Kopelman

  • Social touch deprivation during COVID-19: effects on psychological wellbeing and craving interpersonal touch.

    Mariana von Mohr;Mariana von Mohr;Louise P. Kirsch;Aikaterini Fotopoulou

  • Affective touch and attachment style modulate pain: A laser-evoked potentials study

    Charlotte Krahé;Marianne M. Drabek;Yannis Paloyelis;Aikaterini Fotopoulou

Frequent Co-Authors

Manos Tsakiris
Manos Tsakiris Royal Holloway University of London
Mark Solms
Mark Solms University of Cape Town
Michael D. Kopelman
Michael D. Kopelman King's College London
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten University of Bordeaux
Fernando Zelaya
Fernando Zelaya King's College London
Patrick Haggard
Patrick Haggard University College London
Oliver H. Turnbull
Oliver H. Turnbull Bangor University
Martin A. Conway
Martin A. Conway City, University of London
James M. Kilner
James M. Kilner University College London
Elizabeth Pellicano
Elizabeth Pellicano University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring degrees beyond on-campus psychology programs can greatly broaden your career options. Many students now choose affordable online master's programs in psychology to save on tuition while advancing their expertise. These flexible options are ideal for working professionals or those balancing other commitments.

If you are interested in working with children and supporting educational environments, consider the cheapest school psychology degree online. Such specialized online paths can help you launch a meaningful career in school systems or private practice with reduced financial burden.

For those who prefer studying broader social dynamics, affordable online sociology degrees offer a versatile entry point. A sociology background is valuable in sectors like social services, research, policy, and advocacy.

Many students prioritize finding the best budget-friendly online psychology programs. These degrees ensure a balance between high-quality education and affordability, supporting a wide range of career pathways, including counseling, human resources, or community outreach.

Best Scientists Citing Aikaterini Fotopoulou

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles