World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
13098
World Ranking
6313
National Ranking
506

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
13203
World Ranking
5831
National Ranking
599

Sarah N. Garfinkel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah N. Garfinkel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Sarah N. Garfinkel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah N. Garfinkel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sarah N. Garfinkel is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, including medicine, psychology, and neuroscience, with a strong focus on psychiatry and mental health as well as cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Clinical psychology and social psychology also form part of their subfield expertise.

Their work frequently addresses topics related to psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Other main topics of study include mental health and psychiatry, functional brain connectivity studies, heart rate variability and autonomic control, action observation and synchronization, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Recent publications by Garfinkel include the following:

  • Towards a comprehensive assessment of interoception in a multi-dimensional framework (2022) in Biological Psychology
  • Computational Models of Interoception and Body Regulation (2020) in Trends in Neurosciences
  • Interoceptive pathways to understand and treat mental health conditions (2022) in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Brain-body interactions underlying the association of loneliness with mental and physical health (2020) in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Interoceptive training to target anxiety in autistic adults (ADIE): A single-center, superiority randomized controlled trial (2021) in EClinicalMedicine

Contributions have appeared frequently in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biological Psychology, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

Collaborations with other researchers are evident through coauthorship with individuals including Hugo Critchley, Lisa Quadt, Mahinda Yogarajah, Akihiro Koreki, and Marta Silva, reflecting interdisciplinary engagement and joint research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness.

    Sarah N. Garfinkel;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Anil K. Seth;Adam B. Barrett;Keisuke Suzuki

  • Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap

    Unknown

  • Interoception and emotion.

    Hugo D Critchley;Hugo D Critchley;Sarah N Garfinkel

  • Multisensory integration across exteroceptive and interoceptive domains modulates self-experience in the rubber-hand illusion

    Keisuke Suzuki;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Hugo D. Critchley;Hugo D. Critchley;Anil K. Seth

  • Discrepancies between dimensions of interoception in autism: Implications for emotion and anxiety.

    Sarah N. Garfinkel;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Claire Tiley;Stephanie O'Keeffe;Neil A. Harrison

  • Neural dysregulation in posttraumatic stress disorder: evidence for disrupted equilibrium between salience and default mode brain networks.

    Rebecca K. Sripada;Anthony P. King;Robert C. Welsh;Sarah N. Garfinkel

  • Interoception, emotion and brain: new insights link internal physiology to social behaviour. Commentary on: “Anterior insular cortex mediates bodily sensibility and social anxiety” by Terasawa et al. (2012)

    Sarah N. Garfinkel;Hugo D. Critchley

  • The neurobiology of interoception in health and disease

    Lisa Quadt;Hugo D. Critchley;Hugo D. Critchley;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Sarah N. Garfinkel

  • Impaired Contextual Modulation of Memories in PTSD: An fMRI and Psychophysiological Study of Extinction Retention and Fear Renewal

    Sarah N. Garfinkel;James L. Abelson;Anthony P. King;Rebecca K. Sripada

  • Altered resting-state amygdala functional connectivity in men with posttraumatic stress disorder

    Rebecca K. Sripada;Anthony P. King;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Xin Wang

  • Fear from the Heart: Sensitivity to Fear Stimuli Depends on Individual Heartbeats

    Sarah N. Garfinkel;Ludovico Minati;Marcus A. Gray;Anil K. Seth

  • Interoceptive dimensions across cardiac and respiratory axes.

    Sarah N. Garfinkel;Miranda F. Manassei;Giles Hamilton-Fletcher;Yvo In den Bosch

  • Threat and the Body: How the Heart Supports Fear Processing.

    Sarah N. Garfinkel;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Hugo D. Critchley

  • Interaction between cognition, emotion, and the autonomic nervous system

    Hugo D Critchley;Jessica Eccles;Sarah N Garfinkel;Sarah N Garfinkel

  • What the heart forgets: Cardiac timing influences memory for words and is modulated by metacognition and interoceptive sensitivity

    Sarah N. Garfinkel;Adam B. Barrett;Ludovico Minati;Raymond J. Dolan

  • Towards a comprehensive assessment of interoception in a multi-dimensional framework

    Unknown

  • Alterations in amygdala-prefrontal functional connectivity account for excessive worry and autonomic dysregulation in generalized anxiety disorder

    Elena Makovac;Frances Meeten;Frances Meeten;Frances Meeten;David R. Watson;Aleksandra Herman

  • Computational Models of Interoception and Body Regulation

    Frederike H. Petzschner;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Martin P. Paulus;Martin P. Paulus;Christof Koch

  • The influence of physiological signals on cognition

    Hugo D Critchley;Hugo D Critchley;Sarah N Garfinkel;Sarah N Garfinkel

  • Cardiac afferent activity modulates the expression of racial stereotypes

    Ruben T. Azevedo;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Hugo D. Critchley;Hugo D. Critchley;Manos Tsakiris;Manos Tsakiris

  • Heart rate variability as a biomarker in health and affective disorders: A perspective on neuroimaging studies.

    James S. Mulcahy;Dennis E.O. Larsson;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Hugo D. Critchley

  • Interoceptive Ability Predicts Survival on a London Trading Floor.

    Narayanan Kandasamy;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Lionel Page;Ben Hardy

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugo D. Critchley
Hugo D. Critchley Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Israel Liberzon
Israel Liberzon Texas A&M University
Anil K. Seth
Anil K. Seth University of Sussex
Theodora Duka
Theodora Duka University of Sussex
Neil A. Harrison
Neil A. Harrison Cardiff University
Anthony P. King
Anthony P. King The Ohio State University
Mara Cercignani
Mara Cercignani Cardiff University
Cristina Ottaviani
Cristina Ottaviani Sapienza University of Rome
James L. Abelson
James L. Abelson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James E. Swain
James E. Swain Stony Brook University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to various rewarding fields, including applied behavior analysis, counseling, and mental health services. Careers such as Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) are particularly in demand, offering support to those with behavioral, developmental, and learning challenges.

To pursue this path, you’ll want to research Stockton bcba education requirements and understand the certification process. Requirements often include a broad set of coursework and supervised fieldwork, which can differ by region. Those interested in becoming a BCBA in Florida can start by reviewing how to become a bcba in Tampa for a detailed local guide.

If you’re considering Ohio, learn more about becoming a bcba in Toledo to discover educational prerequisites and practical experience requirements. Similarly, aspiring BCBAs in Arizona can find specific guidance on the Tucson bcba requirements.

With online programs, earning your degree and meeting certification criteria is more flexible than ever, helping you launch a psychology career tailored to your interests and location.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah N. Garfinkel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles