World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Olga Pollatos

Olga Pollatos

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
12621
World Ranking
4761
National Ranking
216

Olga Pollatos publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olga Pollatos sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 130 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Olga Pollatos D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olga Pollatos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olga Pollatos is affiliated with the University of Ulm in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, focusing notably on psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and social psychology.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment and cognitive processes, human-automation interaction and safety, eating disorders and behaviors, pain management and placebo effects, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and digital mental health interventions.

Pollatos has contributed to multiple papers in various scientific journals. Recent publications include:

  • "Comment on "Zamariola et al. (2018), Interoceptive Accuracy Scores are Problematic: Evidence from Simple Bivariate Correlations"-The empirical data base, the conceptual reasoning and the analysis behind this statement are misconceived and do not support the authors' conclusions" (2020), Biological Psychology
  • "Are interoceptive accuracy scores from the heartbeat counting task problematic? A comment on Zamariola et al. (2018)" (2020), Biological Psychology
  • "The Effects of a 3-Week Heartbeat Perception Training on Interoceptive Abilities" (2022), Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • "From Driver to Supervisor: Comparing Cognitive Load and EEG-Based Attentional Resource Allocation Across Automation Levels" (2023), International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • "Using bodily postures to reduce anxiety and improve interoception: A comparison between powerful and neutral poses" (2020), PLoS ONE

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • European Journal of Health Psychology
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Biological Psychology

In collaboration, Pollatos has frequently co-authored with several researchers, including Dana Schultchen, Sandra A. Mai-Lippold, Felicitas Weineck, Gernot Hauke, and Christine Schillings.

Best Publications

  • Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap

    Unknown

  • On the embodiment of emotion regulation: interoceptive awareness facilitates reappraisal

    Jürgen Füstös;Klaus Gramann;Klaus Gramann;Beate M. Herbert;Olga Pollatos

  • Reduced perception of bodily signals in anorexia nervosa.

    Olga Pollatos;Anne-Lene Kurz;Jessica Albrecht;Tatjana Schreder

  • On the Relationship Between Interoceptive Awareness and Alexithymia: Is Interoceptive Awareness Related to Emotional Awareness?

    Beate M. Herbert;Cornelia Herbert;Olga Pollatos

  • The Body in the Mind: On the Relationship Between Interoception and Embodiment

    Beate M. Herbert;Olga Pollatos

  • On the relationship between interoceptive awareness, emotional experience, and brain processes.

    Olga Pollatos;Wladimir Kirsch;Rainer Schandry

  • Brain structures mediating cardiovascular arousal and interoceptive awareness

    Olga Pollatos;Rainer Schandry;Dorothee P. Auer;Christian Kaufmann

  • Neural systems connecting interoceptive awareness and feelings.

    Olga Pollatos;Klaus Gramann;Rainer Schandry

  • Accuracy of heartbeat perception is reflected in the amplitude of the heartbeat-evoked brain potential.

    Olga Pollatos;Rainer Schandry

  • Interoception across Modalities: On the Relationship between Cardiac Awareness and the Sensitivity for Gastric Functions

    Beate M. Herbert;Eric R. Muth;Olga Pollatos;Cornelia Herbert

  • Differential effects of anxiety and depression on interoceptive accuracy.

    Olga Pollatos;Eva Traut-Mattausch;Rainer Schandry

  • Brain structures involved in interoceptive awareness and cardioafferent signal processing: A dipole source localization study

    Olga Pollatos;Wladimir Kirsch;Rainer Schandry

  • Interoceptive sensitivity and emotion processing: an EEG study.

    Beate M. Herbert;Olga Pollatos;Rainer Schandry

  • Bidirectional relationship of stress and affect with physical activity and healthy eating

    Dana Schultchen;Julia Reichenberger;Theresa Mittl;Tabea R. M. Weh

  • Attenuated interoceptive sensitivity in overweight and obese individuals

    Beate M. Herbert;Olga Pollatos

  • Heart rate response after emotional picture presentation is modulated by interoceptive awareness.

    Olga Pollatos;Beate M. Herbert;Ellen Matthias;Rainer Schandry

  • Interoceptive awareness mediates the relationship between anxiety and the intensity of unpleasant feelings

    Olga Pollatos;Eva Traut-Mattausch;Heike Schroeder;Rainer Schandry

  • Cardiac awareness and autonomic cardiac reactivity during emotional picture viewing and mental stress.

    Beate M. Herbert;Olga Pollatos;Herta Flor;Paul Enck

  • Improvement of Interoceptive Processes after an 8-Week Body Scan Intervention.

    Dana Fischer;Matthias Messner;Olga Pollatos

  • On the generalised embodiment of pain: how interoceptive sensitivity modulates cutaneous pain perception.

    Olga Pollatos;Jürgen Füstös;Hugo D. Critchley;Hugo D. Critchley

  • Interoceptive awareness, anxiety and cardiovascular reactivity to isometric exercise

    Olga Pollatos;Beate M Herbert;Christian Kaufmann;Dorothee P Auer

  • Impaired central processing of emotional faces in anorexia nervosa.

    Olga Pollatos;Beate M. Herbert;Rainer Schandry;Klaus Gramann

Frequent Co-Authors

Beate M. Herbert
Beate M. Herbert University of Tübingen
Rainer Schandry
Rainer Schandry Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Klaus Gramann
Klaus Gramann Technical University of Berlin
Peter Henningsen
Peter Henningsen Technical University of Munich
Stefan Duschek
Stefan Duschek UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology
Jens Blechert
Jens Blechert University of Salzburg
Stephan Zipfel
Stephan Zipfel University of Tübingen
Ulrich Voderholzer
Ulrich Voderholzer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Veronika Schöpf
Veronika Schöpf University of Graz
Thomas Kammer
Thomas Kammer University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring social science courses can help you build a well-rounded foundation for a psychology degree. Studying psychology online often overlaps with other social sciences, opening the door to career paths in counseling, social work, research, and education.

It’s important to understand the differences between sociology and psychology, as each field focuses on unique aspects of human behavior and society. Psychology concentrates on individual thoughts and emotions, while sociology looks at larger societal patterns.

If you are interested in counseling, there are region-specific programs worth considering. For example, browse top Baltimore counseling degree programs or research the best college counseling programs in Boston for in-depth training and specialization.

Online psychology degrees can lead to various impactful careers, from mental health counseling to community outreach. Carefully selecting a program that matches your interests and geographic needs can set you up for long-term success and personal growth.

Best Scientists Citing Olga Pollatos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles