World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
120
Citations
81614
World Ranking
3667
National Ranking
200

Frank Tacke publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Tacke sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 759 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank Tacke D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Tacke sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank Tacke is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Epidemiology, Hepatology, Surgery, Oncology, and Immunology.

The main topics of Tacke's scientific work include:

  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Hepatitis C Virus Research
  • Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Liver Physiology and Pathology
  • Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Diet, Metabolism, and Disease

Among Tacke's recent peer-reviewed publications are:

  • EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), 2024, Journal of Hepatology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Tacke include:

  • Vlad Ratziu
  • Christoph Roderburg
  • Adrien Guillot
  • Christian Trautwein
  • Patrizia Burra

Tacke's research is frequently published in several venues, with the most notable being:

  • Journal of Hepatology
  • Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Liver International

The scientist's contributions have centered extensively on liver-related illnesses, combining clinical practice with molecular and immunological insights. Their work spans the epidemiology and treatment of liver diseases, liver transplantation, viral hepatitis, and the immune mechanisms involved in liver pathology.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection.

    Pietro Lampertico;Kosh Agarwal;Thomas Berg;Maria Buti

  • Modeling NAFLD Disease Burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016-2030

    Chris Estes;Quentin M. Anstee;Maria Teresa Arias-Loste;Heike Bantel

  • Global prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: a modelling study

    Devin Razavi-Shearer;Ivane Gamkrelidze;Mindie H Nguyen;Ding-Shinn Chen

  • Senescence surveillance of pre-malignant hepatocytes limits liver cancer development

    Tae-Won Kang;Tetyana Yevsa;Norman Woller;Lisa Hoenicke

  • Monocyte subsets differentially employ CCR2, CCR5, and CX3CR1 to accumulate within atherosclerotic plaques

    Frank Tacke;David Alvarez;Theodore J. Kaplan;Claudia Jakubzick

  • Global Perspectives on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

    Zobair Younossi;Zobair Younossi;Frank Tacke;Marco Arrese;Barjesh Chander Sharma

  • Deep learning can predict microsatellite instability directly from histology in gastrointestinal cancer.

    Jakob Nikolas Kather;Alexander T. Pearson;Niels Halama;Dirk Jäger

  • Resolving the fibrotic niche of human liver cirrhosis at single cell level

    P Ramachandran;R Dobie;J R Wilson-Kanamori;E F Dora

  • Liver macrophages in tissue homeostasis and disease

    Oliver Krenkel;Frank Tacke

  • Immunology in the liver — from homeostasis to disease

    Felix Heymann;Frank Tacke

  • Macrophage heterogeneity in liver injury and fibrosis

    Frank Tacke;Henning W. Zimmermann

  • Micro-RNA profiling reveals a role for miR-29 in human and murine liver fibrosis

    Christoph Roderburg;Gerd-Willem Urban;Kira Bettermann;Mihael Vucur

  • Langerhans cells arise from monocytes in vivo

    Florent Ginhoux;Frank Tacke;Veronique Angeli;Milena Bogunovic

  • Targeting hepatic macrophages to treat liver diseases

    Frank Tacke

  • Comparison of gene expression profiles between human and mouse monocyte subsets

    Molly A. Ingersoll;Rainer Spanbroek;Claudio Lottaz;Emmanuel L. Gautier

  • Hepatic recruitment of the inflammatory Gr1+ monocyte subset upon liver injury promotes hepatic fibrosis.

    Karlin Raja Karlmark;Ralf Weiskirchen;Henning W. Zimmermann;Nikolaus Gassler

  • Roles for Chemokines in Liver Disease

    Fabio Marra;Frank Tacke

  • Alloantigen-presenting plasmacytoid dendritic cells mediate tolerance to vascularized grafts.

    Jordi C Ochando;Chiho Homma;Yu Yang;Andres Hidalgo

  • Comparison of gene expression profiles between human and mouse monocyte subsets (Blood (2010) 115, 3 (e10-e19))

    M Ingersoll;R Spanbroek;C Lottaz;E Gautier

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Trautwein
Christian Trautwein RWTH Aachen University
Ralf Weiskirchen
Ralf Weiskirchen RWTH Aachen University
Twan Lammers
Twan Lammers RWTH Aachen University
Mathias Heikenwalder
Mathias Heikenwalder German Cancer Research Center
Michael P. Manns
Michael P. Manns Hannover Medical School
Sergio A. Lira
Sergio A. Lira Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Claus Hellerbrand
Claus Hellerbrand University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Nikolaus Marx
Nikolaus Marx RWTH Aachen University
Fabian Kiessling
Fabian Kiessling RWTH Aachen University
Stefan Mauss
Stefan Mauss Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers doesn’t always mean attending traditional, on-campus programs. There are a variety of online degrees and certificates offering flexibility and affordability for those interested in healthcare fields. For example, those curious about how much does it cost to become a medical coder will find online courses can be a quicker, cost-effective way into administrative healthcare roles.

Nursing continues to be a high-demand profession with online paths ranging from entry-level degrees to advanced practice. If you’re researching the most affordable online nurse practitioner programs, you’ll find options to fast-track your transition to advanced clinical roles without sacrificing current job commitments. Similarly, a nursing degree online makes it easier for aspiring nurses to enter the profession from anywhere.

For those aiming to move into research or education, a PhD in nursing online programs can open doors to leadership and academic careers. By considering these online options, students can discover accessible and affordable pathways to begin or advance a rewarding healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Tacke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles