World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
10442
World Ranking
6606
National Ranking
3587

Sahib S. Khalsa publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sahib S. Khalsa sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 187 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Sahib S. Khalsa D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sahib S. Khalsa sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sahib S. Khalsa is affiliated with the Laureate Institute for Brain Research in the United States, focusing on interdisciplinary research that bridges medicine, psychology, and neuroscience. Their scholarly output spans a variety of domains related to mental health, cognitive processes, and brain function.

The main fields of study in Khalsa's research include Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience. Within these broad areas, they have contributed significantly to several subfields such as Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist's work frequently addresses topics related to psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, functional brain connectivity studies, eating disorders and behaviors, tryptophan and brain disorders, mental health and psychiatry, and heart rate variability and autonomic control.

Khalsa has published extensively in several prominent scientific venues. The most frequent venues where their work appears include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Biological Psychiatry, Scientific Reports, Biological Psychology, and Neuropsychopharmacology.

Collaboration has been a notable aspect of Khalsa's research career, with frequent co-authors including Martin P. Paulus, Rayus Kuplicki, Jennifer L. Stewart, Robin L. Aupperle, and Ryan Smith, indicating active engagement in multidisciplinary research environments.

Selected recent papers represent important contributions to the understanding of interoception, mental health, and computational neuroscience:

  • Neural Circuits of Interoception, 2020, Trends in Neurosciences
  • Prevalence and Family-Related Factors Associated With Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempts, and Self-injury in Children Aged 9 to 10 Years, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Computational Models of Interoception and Body Regulation, 2020, Trends in Neurosciences
  • A Bayesian computational model reveals a failure to adapt interoceptive precision estimates across depression, anxiety, eating, and substance use disorders, 2020, PLoS Computational Biology
  • A framework for understanding the pathophysiology of functional neurological disorder, 2020, CNS Spectrums

Best Publications

  • Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap

    Unknown

  • The hierarchical basis of neurovisceral integration.

    Ryan Smith;Julian F. Thayer;Sahib S. Khalsa;Richard D. Lane

  • Severity of neuropsychological impairment in cocaine and alcohol addiction: association with metabolism in the prefrontal cortex.

    Rita Z. Goldstein;Andreana C. Leskovjan;Anne L. Hoff;Robert Hitzemann

  • The pathways of interoceptive awareness

    Sahib S Khalsa;David Rudrauf;Justin S Feinstein;Daniel Tranel

  • Can Interoception Improve the Pragmatic Search for Biomarkers in Psychiatry

    Sahib S. Khalsa;Sahib S. Khalsa;Rachel C. Lapidus;Rachel C. Lapidus

  • What happens after treatment? A systematic review of relapse, remission, and recovery in anorexia nervosa.

    Sahib S. Khalsa;Sahib S. Khalsa;Larissa C. Portnoff;Danyale McCurdy-McKinnon;Jamie D. Feusner

  • Neural Circuits of Interoception

    Gary G. Berntson;Sahib S. Khalsa

  • Interoceptive awareness in experienced meditators

    Sahib S. Khalsa;David Rudrauf;Antonio R. Damasio;Richard J. Davidson

  • Current diagnosis and treatment of anxiety disorders.

    Alexander Bystritsky;Sahib S Khalsa;Michael E Cameron;Jason Schiffman

  • An Active Inference Approach to Interoceptive Psychopathology.

    Martin P. Paulus;Justin S. Feinstein;Justin S. Feinstein;Sahib S. Khalsa;Sahib S. Khalsa

  • Clinical neurocardiology defining the value of neuroscience-based cardiovascular therapeutics

    Kalyanam Shivkumar;Olujimi A. Ajijola;Inder Anand;J. Andrew Armour

  • Interoceptive awareness declines with age.

    Sahib S. Khalsa;David Rudrauf;Daniel Tranel

  • Prevalence and Family-Related Factors Associated With Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempts, and Self-injury in Children Aged 9 to 10 Years

    Danielle C. DeVille;Danielle C. DeVille;Diana Whalen;Florence J. Breslin;Amanda S. Morris;Amanda S. Morris

  • Preserved Self-Awareness following Extensive Bilateral Brain Damage to the Insula, Anterior Cingulate, and Medial Prefrontal Cortices

    Carissa L. Philippi;Justin S. Feinstein;Sahib S. Khalsa;Antonio Damasio

  • Testing the independence of self-reported interoceptive accuracy and attention.

    Jennifer Joanne Murphy;Rebecca Jane Brewer;David Plans;Sahib Khalsa;Sahib Khalsa

  • Altered interoceptive awareness in anorexia nervosa: Effects of meal anticipation, consumption and bodily arousal.

    Sahib S. Khalsa;Michelle G. Craske;Michelle G. Craske;Wei Li;Sitaram Vangala

  • Computational Models of Interoception and Body Regulation

    Frederike H. Petzschner;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Sarah N. Garfinkel;Martin P. Paulus;Martin P. Paulus;Christof Koch

  • A Bayesian computational model reveals a failure to adapt interoceptive precision estimates across depression, anxiety, eating, and substance use disorders.

    Ryan Smith;Rayus Kuplicki;Justin Feinstein;Justin Feinstein;Katherine L Forthman

  • Bolus isoproterenol infusions provide a reliable method for assessing interoceptive awareness.

    S.S. Khalsa;D. Rudrauf;C. Sandesara;B. Olshansky

  • A framework for understanding the pathophysiology of functional neurological disorder.

    Daniel L. Drane;Negar Fani;Mark Hallett;Sahib S. Khalsa

  • The Insular Cortex Dynamically Maps Changes in Cardiorespiratory Interoception.

    Mahlega S Hassanpour;W Kyle Simmons;W Kyle Simmons;Justin S Feinstein;Justin S Feinstein;Qingfei Luo

  • Preserved emotional awareness of pain in a patient with extensive bilateral damage to the insula, anterior cingulate, and amygdala

    Justin S. Feinstein;Justin S. Feinstein;Justin S. Feinstein;Sahib S. Khalsa;Sahib S. Khalsa;Sahib S. Khalsa;Tim V. Salomons;Kenneth M. Prkachin

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin P. Paulus
Martin P. Paulus Laureate Institute for Brain Research
W. Kyle Simmons
W. Kyle Simmons Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
David Rudrauf
David Rudrauf University of Geneva
Daniel Tranel
Daniel Tranel University of Iowa
Michael Strober
Michael Strober University of California, Los Angeles
Kalyanam Shivkumar
Kalyanam Shivkumar University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA often leads students to consider closely related fields such as social work. Online degree options are expanding quickly, offering flexible pathways for future professionals. For those seeking an advanced credential without extended time on campus, the easiest online social work doctorate degrees in the US can provide leadership opportunities and specialized knowledge from the comfort of home.

If you’re more interested in practice-focused graduate study, there are also easiest online social work master's degree programs in America that deliver a mix of academic rigor and convenience. Bachelor’s degree seekers can explore the easiest online social work degrees in the US for accessible options to kickstart their careers.

For those eager to enter the workforce quickly, accelerated online social work degrees in Arizona are designed to fast-track graduation and launch careers faster. Each pathway offers diverse roles in mental health, counseling, and community services, making them ideal for students with an interest in human behavior and psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Sahib S. Khalsa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles