World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
9000
World Ranking
9053
National Ranking
103

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
9531
World Ranking
7989
National Ranking
185

David Rudrauf publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Rudrauf sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 80 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David Rudrauf D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Rudrauf sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Rudrauf is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland and is an active researcher in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, artificial intelligence, and sociology and political science.

The main topics of David Rudrauf's research focus on embodied and extended cognition, action observation and synchronization, neural dynamics and brain function, child and animal learning development, functional brain connectivity studies, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and neuroendocrine regulation and behavior.

Recent scholarly contributions by David Rudrauf include the following papers:

  • The integrated information theory of consciousness: A case of mistaken identity, 2021, Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Lesion network mapping demonstrates that mind-wandering is associated with the default mode network, 2020, Journal of Neuroscience Research
  • Pre-Reflective Self-Consciousness & Projective Geometry, 2022, Review of Philosophy and Psychology
  • Modeling the subjective perspective of consciousness and its role in the control of behaviours, 2021, Journal of Theoretical Biology
  • Socially Supported by an Embodied Agent: The Development of a Virtual-Reality Paradigm to Study Social Emotion Regulation, 2022, Frontiers in Virtual Reality

David Rudrauf frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Neuroscience Research
  • Journal of Theoretical Biology
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Among frequent co-authors, David Rudrauf has collaborated with Kenneth Williford, Yvain Tisserand, Grégoire Sergeant-Perthuis, O. Belli, and Andrea C. Samson.

Best Publications

  • Damage to the insula disrupts addiction to cigarette smoking.

    Nasir H. Naqvi;David Rudrauf;Hanna Damasio;Antoine Bechara;Antoine Bechara

  • Lesion mapping of cognitive control and value-based decision making in the prefrontal cortex

    Jan Gläscher;Ralph Adolphs;Hanna Damasio;Antoine Bechara;Antoine Bechara

  • Estimating the time-course of coherence between single-trial brain signals: an introduction to wavelet coherence.

    Jean-Philippe Lachaux;Antoine Lutz;David Rudrauf;Diego Cosmelli

  • The pathways of interoceptive awareness

    Sahib S Khalsa;David Rudrauf;Justin S Feinstein;Daniel Tranel

  • Alterations in brain structure and functional connectivity in prescription opioid-dependent patients

    Jaymin Upadhyay;Nasim Maleki;Jennifer Sharpe Potter;Jennifer Sharpe Potter;Igor Elman

  • Intracranial EEG and human brain mapping.

    J.Ph Lachaux;D Rudrauf;P Kahane

  • Interoceptive awareness in experienced meditators

    Sahib S. Khalsa;David Rudrauf;Antonio R. Damasio;Richard J. Davidson

  • From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology: Francisco Varela's exploration of the biophysics of being

    David Rudrauf;Antoine Lutz;Diego Cosmelli;Jean-Philippe Lachaux

  • Distributed neural system for general intelligence revealed by lesion mapping

    J. Gläscher;D. Rudrauf;R. Colom;L. K. Paul

  • BEHAVIORAL PATTERNS AND LESION SITES ASSOCIATED WITH IMPAIRED PROCESSING OF LEXICAL AND CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE OF ACTIONS

    David Kemmerer;David Rudrauf;Ken Manzel;Daniel Tranel

  • Lesion Mapping of Cognitive Abilities Linked to Intelligence

    Jan Gläscher;Daniel Tranel;Lynn K. Paul;David Rudrauf

  • Damage to Association Fiber Tracts Impairs Recognition of the Facial Expression of Emotion

    Carissa L. Philippi;Shruti Mehta;Thomas Grabowski;Ralph Adolphs

  • Interoceptive awareness declines with age.

    Sahib S. Khalsa;David Rudrauf;Daniel Tranel

  • Relating structure and function in the human brain: relative contributions of anatomy, stationary dynamics, and non-stationarities.

    Arnaud Messé;David Rudrauf;Habib Benali;Guillaume Marrelec

  • Preserved Self-Awareness following Extensive Bilateral Brain Damage to the Insula, Anterior Cingulate, and Medial Prefrontal Cortices

    Carissa L. Philippi;Justin S. Feinstein;Sahib S. Khalsa;Antonio Damasio

  • Rapid interactions between the ventral visual stream and emotion-related structures rely on a two-pathway architecture.

    David Rudrauf;Olivier David;Jean-Philippe Lachaux;Christopher K. Kovach

  • Bolus isoproterenol infusions provide a reliable method for assessing interoceptive awareness.

    S.S. Khalsa;D. Rudrauf;C. Sandesara;B. Olshansky

  • Damage to the default mode network disrupts autobiographical memory retrieval

    Carissa L. Philippi;Daniel Tranel;Melissa Duff;David Rudrauf

  • Medial pfc damage abolishes the self-reference effect

    Carissa L. Philippi;Melissa C. Duff;Natalie L. Denburg;Daniel Tranel

  • Probabilistic functional tractography of the human cortex revisited.

    Lena Trebaul;Pierre Deman;Viateur Tuyisenge;Maciej Jedynak

  • Frequency flows and the time-frequency dynamics of multivariate phase synchronization in brain signals

    David Rudrauf;Abdel Douiri;Abdel Douiri;Christopher K. Kovach;Jean-Philippe Lachaux;Jean-Philippe Lachaux

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Tranel
Daniel Tranel University of Iowa
Sahib S. Khalsa
Sahib S. Khalsa Laureate Institute for Brain Research
Thomas J. Grabowski
Thomas J. Grabowski University of Washington
Hanna Damasio
Hanna Damasio University of Southern California
Ralph Adolphs
Ralph Adolphs California Institute of Technology
Olivier David
Olivier David Grenoble Alpes University
Jacques Martinerie
Jacques Martinerie Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Michel Le Van Quyen
Michel Le Van Quyen Sorbonne University
Antonio R. Damasio
Antonio R. Damasio University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the field of neuroscience continues to expand, students frequently explore related disciplines that offer alternative career paths in behavioral health, mental health, and clinical practice. A popular option is pursuing an online degree in psychology, which provides foundational knowledge beneficial for research, counseling, and therapy roles. For those looking to advance, understanding how much is a master's degree in psychology can help you plan your academic investment and budget.

If you're interested in family dynamics, consider affordable mft programs that can prepare you for roles as a Marriage and Family Therapist. Another option is a flexible msw degree online (Master of Social Work), which opens doors to impactful positions in clinical social work and therapy.

Choosing an online pathway offers convenience, flexibility, and accessible entry points into dynamic and rewarding careers allied with neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing David Rudrauf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles