World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Arthur Frankel publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur Frankel sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Arthur Frankel D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur Frankel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Arthur Frankel is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Engineering, with a significant emphasis on Geophysics and Civil and Structural Engineering. Additionally, Arthur Frankel has contributed to studies involving Artificial Intelligence, Anthropology, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their work covers a wide range of topics, including:

  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Earthquake and Tectonic Studies
  • Seismology and Earthquake Studies
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • High-pressure Geophysics and Materials

Arthur Frankel has published extensively in several venues, with frequent publications in the following journals:

  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • Earthquake Spectra
  • Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Fact Sheet

Recent publications by Arthur Frankel include:

  • "The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications," 2023, Earthquake Spectra
  • "The USGS 2023 Conterminous U.S. Time-Independent Earthquake Rupture Forecast," 2023, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • "Expected warning times from the ShakeAlert earthquake early warning system for earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest," 2021, Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World
  • "The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Ground motion models in the western US," 2021, Earthquake Spectra
  • "Basin Amplification Effects in the Puget Lowland, Washington, from Strong-Motion Recordings and 3D Simulations," 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Frequent co-authors of Arthur Frankel include:

  • Erin A. Wirth
  • Mark D. Petersen
  • Allison M. Shumway
  • Peter M. Powers
  • Morgan P. Moschetti

Arthur Frankel was recognized as a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Documentation for the 2008 update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps

    Mark D. Petersen;Arthur D. Frankel;Stephen C. Harmsen;Charles S. Mueller

  • Mapping Seismic Hazard in the Central and Eastern United States

    Arthur Frankel

  • Finite difference simulations of seismic scattering: Implications for the propagation of short‐period seismic waves in the crust and models of crustal heterogeneity

    Arthur Frankel;Robert W. Clayton

  • The permeability of whole and jointed Barre Granite

    R.L. Kranzz;A.D. Frankel;T. Engelder;C.H. Scholz

  • Documentation for the 2002 update of the national seismic hazard maps

    Arthur D. Frankel;Mark D. Petersen;Charles S. Mueller;Kathleen M. Haller

  • The 2002 Denali fault earthquake, Alaska: a large magnitude, slip-partitioned event.

    Donna Eberhart-Phillips;Peter J Haeussler;Jeffrey T Freymueller;Arthur D Frankel

  • National Seismic-Hazard Maps: Documentation June 1996

    Arthur D. Frankel;Charlies S. Mueller;Theodore P. Barnhard;David M. Perkins

  • Energy-flux model of seismic coda: Separation of scattering and intrinsic attenuation

    Arthur Frankel;Leif Wennerberg

  • Documentation for the 2014 update of the United States national seismic hazard maps

    Mark D. Petersen;Morgan P. Moschetti;Peter M. Powers;Charles S. Mueller

  • Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2)

    Edward H Field;Timothy E Dawson;Karen R Felzer;Arthur D Frankel

  • A three-dimensional simulation of seismic waves in the Santa Clara Valley, California, from a Loma Prieta aftershock

    Arthur Frankel;John Vidale

  • Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the state of California

    M.D. Petersen;W.A. Bryant;C.H. Cramer;Tiaquing Cao

  • Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion: Comparison of methods and validation using strong-ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake

    Stephen Hartzell;Stephen Harmsen;Arthur Frankel;Shawn Larsen

  • Attenuation of high‐frequency shear waves in the crust: Measurements from New York State, South Africa, and southern California

    Arthur Frankel;Art McGarr;John Bicknell;Jim Mori

  • Source parameters for small events associated with the 1986 North Palm Springs, California, earthquake determined using empirical Green functions

    Jim Mori;Arthur Frankel

  • The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview of model and implications:

    Mark D. Petersen;Allison M. Shumway;Peter M. Powers;Charles S. Mueller

  • High-frequency spectral falloff of earthquakes, fractal dimension of complex rupture, b value, and the scaling of strength on faults

    Arthur Frankel

  • Three-dimensional simulations of ground motions in the San Bernardino Valley, California, for hypothetical earthquakes on the San Andreas fault

    Arthur Frankel

  • Nonlinear and Linear Site Response and Basin Effects in Seattle for the M 6.8 Nisqually, Washington, Earthquake

    Arthur D. Frankel;David L. Carver;Robert A. Williams

  • USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps

    A. D. Frankel;C. S. Mueller;T. P. Barnhard;E. V. Leyendecker

  • 2014 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps

    M. D. Petersen;C. S. Mueller;M. P. Moschetti;K. M. Haller

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark D. Petersen
Mark D. Petersen United States Geological Survey
Charles S. Mueller
Charles S. Mueller United States Geological Survey
Stephen C. Harmsen
Stephen C. Harmsen United States Geological Survey
Stephen H. Hartzell
Stephen H. Hartzell United States Geological Survey
John E. Vidale
John E. Vidale University of Southern California
Yuehua Zeng
Yuehua Zeng United States Geological Survey
Edward H. Field
Edward H. Field United States Geological Survey
Thomas M. Brocher
Thomas M. Brocher United States Geological Survey
Rui Chen
Rui Chen Capital Medical University
Eric M. Thompson
Eric M. Thompson United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science through online degrees opens up diverse career pathways connected to environmental research, natural resources management, and sustainability. Many students benefit from the flexibility of online programs, enabling them to balance studies with other commitments.

For veterans looking to leverage their experience, programs like the best online spanish degree programs for veterans can provide additional language skills that enhance communication in global environmental projects.

Similarly, those interested in creative aspects of environmental awareness might explore the best online mfa programs, which often emphasize storytelling and visual arts to promote Earth conservation efforts.

Management roles in environmental organizations may require skills found in the best online human resource management masters degree programs, helping graduates lead teams effectively.

Moreover, Earth Science is a field accessible to lifelong learners. The degrees for seniors highlight opportunities for older adults to continue education and contribute valuable insights based on decades of experience.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur Frankel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles