World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
5952
World Ranking
8889
National Ranking
4724

Malcolm R. McNeil publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm R. McNeil sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 179 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Malcolm R. McNeil D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm R. McNeil sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Malcolm R. McNeil is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected fields related to brain function, language, and cognitive processes, with a focus on neuroscience, psychology, and medicine. Specifically, their work has contributed to subfields including cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, psychiatry and mental health, rehabilitation, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The main topics addressed in Malcolm R. McNeil's research include the neurobiology of language and bilingualism, dementia and cognitive impairment research, spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction, reading and literacy development, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, and EEG and brain-computer interfaces.

McNeil has published papers in multiple academic venues. Frequently published journals include:

  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • Journal of Communication Disorders
  • Aphasiology
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics

Representative recent publications include:

  • Associations among depression, demographic variables, and language impairments in chronic post-stroke aphasia, 2022, Journal of Communication Disorders
  • Linguistic and nonlinguistic processing speed across age-matched normal healthy controls and individuals with left-hemisphere damage, with and without aphasia, 2021, Aphasiology
  • Development of the English Listening and Reading Computerized Revised Token Test Into Cantonese: Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity/Specificity in People With Aphasia and Healthy Controls, 2020, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • Need for cognition is associated with the interaction of reward and task-load on effort: A verification and extension study, 2022, International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Reading and listening comprehension in Cantonese-speaking people with right hemisphere versus left hemisphere brain damage, 2023, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics

Malcolm R. McNeil frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Sheila R. Pratt
  • Michael Walsh Dickey
  • Mehdi Bakhtiar
  • Min Ney Wong
  • Tepanta Fossett

Best Publications

  • Central Auditory Processing: Current Status of Research and Implications for Clinical Practice Task Force on Central Auditory Processing Consensus Development

    Hugh W. Catts;Gail D. Chermak;Chie Higuchi Craig;Judith R. Johnston

  • Toward the Integration of Resource Allocation into a General Theory of Aphasia

    Malcolm R. McNeil;Katharine Odell;Chin-Hsing Tseng

  • Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition

    Malcolm R. McNeil;Sheila R. Pratt

  • Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders

    Malcolm Ray McNeil

  • Treatment guidelines for acquired apraxia of speech: a synthesis and evaluation of the evidence

    Julie L. Wambaugh;Joseph R. Duffy;Malcolm R. McNeil;Donald A. Robin

  • Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia.

    William D. Hula;Malcolm R. McNeil

  • An Investigation of Attention Allocation Deficits in Aphasia

    Chin-Hsing Tseng;M. R. Mcneil;P. Milenkovic

  • Treatment for Acquired Apraxia of Speech: A Systematic Review of Intervention Research Between 2004 and 2012

    Kirrie J. Ballard;Julie L. Wambaugh;Joseph R. Duffy;Claire Layfield

  • Perceptual characteristics of consonant production by apraxic speakers.

    Katharine Odell;Malcolm R. McNeil;John C. Rosenbek;Linda Hunter

  • Perceptual Characteristics of Vowel and Prosody Production in Apraxic, Aphasic, and Dysarthric Speakers

    Katharine Odell;Malcolm R. McNeil;John C. Rosenbek;Linda Hunter

  • The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders

    Patrick J. Doyle;Malcolm R. McNeil;Joseph M. Mikolic;Luis Prieto

  • Treatment guidelines for acquired apraxia of speech: treatment descriptions and recommendations

    Julie L. Wambaugh;Joseph R. Duffy;Malcolm R. McNeil;Donald A. Robin

  • Reliability and concurrent validity of the information unit scoring metric for the story retelling procedure

    Malcolm R. McNeil;Patrick J. Doyle;Tepanta R. D. Fossett;Grace H. Park

  • Verbal working memory and its relationship to sentence‐level reading and listening comprehension in persons with aphasia

    Jee Eun Sung;Malcolm R. McNeil;Sheila R. Pratt;Michael Walsh Dickey

  • Effects of speech rate on the absolute and relative timing of apraxic and conduction aphasic sentence production.

    Malcolm R. McNeil;Julie M. Liss;Chin Hsing Tseng;Raymond D. Kent

  • Oral structure nonspeech motor control in normal, dysarthric, aphasic and apraxic speakers: isometric force and static position control.

    Malcolm R. McNeil;Gary Weismer;Scott Adams;Moira Mulligan

  • Behavioral and Pharmacological Treatment of Lexical-Semantic Deficits in a Single Patient With Primary Progressive Aphasia

    Malcolm R. McNeil;Steven L. Small;Robert J. Masterson;Tepanta R. D. Fossett

  • A predictive model for diagnosing stroke-related apraxia of speech

    Kirrie J. Ballard;Lamiae Azizi;Joseph R. Duffy;Malcolm R. McNeil;Malcolm R. McNeil

  • Effects of Length and Linguistic Complexity on Temporal Acoustic Measures in Apraxia of Speech

    Edythe A. Strand;Malcolm R. McNeil

  • The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS): Validating patient-reported communication difficulty and associated psychological distress in stroke survivors

    Patrick Doyle;Malcolm> McNeil;William Hula;Joseph Mikolic

  • Sound production treatment for apraxia of speech: overgeneralization and maintenance effects

    Julie L. Wambaugh;Aida L. Martinez;Malcolm R. McNeil;Margaret A. Rogers

  • The Dysarthrias: Physiology, Acoustics, Perception, Management

    Malcolm Ray McNeil;John C. Rosenbek;Arnold Elvin Aronson

  • Apraxia of speech : physiology, acoustics, linguistics, management

    John C. Rosenbek;Malcolm Ray McNeil;Arnold Elvin Aronson

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph R. Duffy
Joseph R. Duffy Mayo Clinic
Donald A. Robin
Donald A. Robin University of New Hampshire
Kirrie J. Ballard
Kirrie J. Ballard University of Sydney
Steven L. Small
Steven L. Small The University of Texas at Dallas
David O. Okonkwo
David O. Okonkwo University of Pittsburgh
Edythe A. Strand
Edythe A. Strand Mayo Clinic
Walter Schneider
Walter Schneider University of Pittsburgh
Regina E. McGlinchey
Regina E. McGlinchey Boston University
Robert D. Kerns
Robert D. Kerns Yale University
J. Scott Yaruss
J. Scott Yaruss Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of career options, both in traditional and online formats. Many students are interested in becoming licensed therapists, which usually requires meeting state-specific education and licensing requirements. Online psychology degrees can be a flexible first step, but it's vital to ensure any program you choose meets the standards for your desired licensing path.

For those aiming to become a licensed professional counselor, local guidelines can vary significantly. For example, you can explore how to become a licensed therapist in Gilbert, or review the process for how to become a licensed therapist in Glendale. In cities across the country, there are different steps and supervision hours required, such as following the licensed therapist requirements in Greensboro or researching the Henderson licensed therapist requirements.

Before choosing your degree or career path, make sure you understand the specific licensure requirements in your target state or city. This will ensure that your education aligns with your professional goals and sets you up for a successful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Malcolm R. McNeil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles