World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
7084
World Ranking
9119
National Ranking
4837

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
7085
World Ranking
8725
National Ranking
3700

Ian G. Dobbins publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian G. Dobbins sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 81 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ian G. Dobbins D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian G. Dobbins sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian G. Dobbins is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their primary field of study lies within Neuroscience, with a focus on several subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, General Health Professions, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The research topics frequently addressed by Dobbins encompass:

  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Face Recognition and Perception

Their recent publications demonstrate a concentration on cognitive processes related to memory and recognition. Key papers include:

  • "Pupil dilation signals recognition salience," 2021, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Recognition receiver operating characteristic asymmetry: Increased noise or information?", 2023, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • "The limited memory of value following value directed encoding," 2024, Memory & Cognition
  • "Comparing human evaluations of eyewitness statements to a machine learning classifier under pristine and suboptimal lineup administration procedures," 2024, Cognition
  • "Pupil dilation during memory encoding reflects time pressure rather than depth of processing," 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Dobbins include Gizem Filiz, Justin Kantner, Lilach Lieberman, Talya Sadeh, and Marina P. Gross.

The scientist has published extensively in notable venues such as:

  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition
  • Memory & Cognition
  • Cognition
  • Neuropsychologia

Best Publications

  • Executive Control during Episodic Retrieval: Multiple Prefrontal Processes Subserve Source Memory

    Ian G Dobbins;Heather Foley;Daniel L Schacter;Anthony D Wagner

  • Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia : Convergence of remember-know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data

    Andrew P. Yonelinas;Neal E. A. Kroll;Ian Dobbins;Michele Lazzara

  • Effects of healthy aging on hippocampal and rhinal memory functions: an event-related fMRI study.

    Sander M. Daselaar;Mathias S. Fleck;Ian G. Dobbins;David J. Madden

  • Memory orientation and success: separable neurocognitive components underlying episodic recognition.

    Ian G Dobbins;Ian G Dobbins;Heather J Rice;Anthony D Wagner;Daniel L Schacter

  • Specificity of priming: a cognitive neuroscience perspective

    Daniel L. Schacter;Ian G. Dobbins;David M. Schnyer

  • Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning.

    Ian G. Dobbins;David M. Schnyer;David M. Schnyer;Mieke Verfaellie;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection.

    Andrew P. Yonelinas;Ian Dobbins;Michael D. Szymanski;Harpreet S. Dhaliwal

  • Domain-general and Domain-sensitive Prefrontal Mechanisms for Recollecting Events and Detecting Novelty

    Ian G. Dobbins;Anthony D. Wagner

  • Role of Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Regions in Decision-Making Processes Shared by Memory and Nonmemory Tasks

    Mathias S. Fleck;Sander M. Daselaar;Ian G. Dobbins;Roberto Cabeza

  • Recognition memory for faces: when familiarity supports associative recognition judgments.

    A. P. Yonelinas;N. E. A. Kroll;I. G. Dobbins;M. Soltani

  • The Inferior Parietal Lobule and Recognition Memory: Expectancy Violation or Successful Retrieval?

    Akira R. O'Connor;Sanghoon Han;Ian G. Dobbins

  • Automatic affective responses to smoking cues.

    B. Keith Payne;F. Joseph McClernon;Ian G. Dobbins

  • The effects of priming on frontal-temporal communication

    Avniel S. Ghuman;Moshe Bar;Ian G. Dobbins;David M. Schnyer

  • fMRI Evidence for Separable and Lateralized Prefrontal Memory Monitoring Processes

    Ian G. Dobbins;Jon S. Simons;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Distinctiveness in Recognition and Free Recall: The Role of Recollection in the Rejection of the Familiar

    Ian G. Dobbins;Neal E.A. Kroll;Andrew P. Yonelinas;Qiang Liu

  • Functional Significance of Striatal Responses during Episodic Decisions: Recovery or Goal Attainment?

    Sanghoon Han;Scott A. Huettel;Scott A. Huettel;Ana Raposo;R. Alison Adcock;R. Alison Adcock

  • Cue- versus Probe-dependent Prefrontal Cortex Activity during Contextual Remembering

    Ian G. Dobbins;Sanghoon Han

  • The contribution of recollection and familiarity to yes-no and forced-choice recognition tests in healthy subjects and amnesics

    Wayne Khoe;Neal E.A Kroll;Andrew P Yonelinas;Ian G Dobbins

  • The costs and benefits of memory conformity

    Antonio Jaeger;Paula Lauris;Diana Selmeczy;Ian G. Dobbins

  • Rapid response learning in amnesia: delineating associative learning components in repetition priming.

    David M. Schnyer;David M. Schnyer;Ian G. Dobbins;Lindsay Nicholls;Daniel L. Schacter

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Schnyer
David M. Schnyer The University of Texas at Austin
Andrew P. Yonelinas
Andrew P. Yonelinas University of California, Davis
Daniel L. Schacter
Daniel L. Schacter Harvard University
Scott A. Huettel
Scott A. Huettel Duke University
Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Elizabeth Aylward
Elizabeth Aylward Seattle Children's Hospital
Roberto Cabeza
Roberto Cabeza Duke University
Mieke Verfaellie
Mieke Verfaellie Boston University
Anthony D. Wagner
Anthony D. Wagner Stanford University
Jon S. Simons
Jon S. Simons University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Neuroscience in the USA, exploring related online degrees can expand your career options in health, research, and therapy fields. Many students interested in neuroscience also pursue psychology due to the close link between brain science and behavior. When budgeting for your education, it's helpful to understand how much is a psychology degree—online programs can offer more affordable or flexible solutions compared to traditional paths.

Social work is another popular field, and those interested in a faster or more accessible route may benefit from exploring the easiest msw online program options. For those leaning into clinical psychology, the best online psyd programs can provide the skills needed for a career as a licensed psychologist.

If you're looking into therapy roles with a neuroscience background, the best online mft programs are worth exploring. Each pathway can lead to impactful careers—choose one that aligns with your interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ian G. Dobbins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles