World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
14649
World Ranking
3853
National Ranking
2158

David M. Schnyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Schnyer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 146 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

David M. Schnyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Schnyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David M. Schnyer is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on subfields such as Epidemiology, Neurology, Emergency Medicine, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their work spans various topics, notably including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Sleep and related disorders

David M. Schnyer has published extensively in several journals, with frequent appearances in:

  • Journal of Neurotrauma (17 publications)
  • JAMA Network Open (12 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (6 publications)
  • Neurology (3 publications)
  • Neurotrauma Reports (3 publications)

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Schnyer are:

  • Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study, 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • Diagnosing Level of Consciousness: The Limits of the Glasgow Coma Scale Total Score, 2021, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Association of Sex and Age With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Symptoms: A TRACK-TBI Study, 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • Point-of-Care Platform Blood Biomarker Testing of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein versus S100 Calcium-Binding Protein B for Prediction of Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study, 2020, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Symptom Frequency and Persistence in the First Year after Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study, 2022, Journal of Neurotrauma

Collaboration appears to be a significant aspect of Schnyer's research, with frequent co-authors including John K. Yue, Sabrina R. Taylor, Pratik Mukherjee, Geoffrey T. Manley, and David O. Okonkwo. These collaborations suggest active engagement in multidisciplinary research efforts within their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Symptomatology and Functional Outcome in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from the Prospective TRACK-TBI Study

    Paul McMahon;Paul McMahon;Allison Hricik;John K. Yue;Ava M. Puccio

  • Acute Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury: Relationship between Plasma Levels of Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein

    Ramon Diaz-Arrastia;Kevin K.W. Wang;Linda Papa;Marco D. Sorani

  • Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury

    Esther L. Yuh;Pratik Mukherjee;Hester F. Lingsma;John K. Yue

  • Recovery After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients Presenting to US Level I Trauma Centers: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Study.

    Lindsay D. Nelson;Nancy R. Temkin;Sureyya Dikmen;Jason Barber

  • Hippocampal complex and retrieval of recent and very remote autobiographical memories: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging in neurologically intact people

    Lee Ryan;Lynn Nadel;Katrina Keil;Karen Putnam

  • Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Pilot: Multicenter Implementation of the Common Data Elements for Traumatic Brain Injury

    John K. Yue;Mary J. Vassar;Hester F. Lingsma;Shelly R. Cooper

  • Specificity of priming: a cognitive neuroscience perspective

    Daniel L. Schacter;Ian G. Dobbins;David M. Schnyer

  • Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning.

    Ian G. Dobbins;David M. Schnyer;David M. Schnyer;Mieke Verfaellie;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study

    Michael A McCrea;Joseph T Giacino;Joseph T Giacino;Jason Barber;Nancy R Temkin

  • A critical role for the anterior hippocampus in relational memory: Evidence from an fMRI study comparing associative and item recognition

    Kelly Sullivan Giovanello;David M. Schnyer;David M. Schnyer;Mieke Verfaellie

  • Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression in Civilian Patients After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study

    Murray B. Stein;Murray B. Stein;Sonia Jain;Joseph T. Giacino;Joseph T. Giacino;Harvey Levin

  • The neurological and cognitive sequelae of cardiac arrest

    Chun Lim;M. P. Alexander;M. P. Alexander;G. LaFleche;David Schnyer

  • Comparing Plasma Phospho Tau, Total Tau, and Phospho Tau-Total Tau Ratio as Acute and Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers.

    Richard Rubenstein;Binggong Chang;John K Yue;Allen Chiu

  • Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Outcome Prediction in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study

    Esther Lim Yuh;Shelly R. Cooper;Pratik Mukherjee;John K. Yue

  • Patterns of autobiographical memory loss in medial-temporal lobe amnesic patients.

    R. Shayna Rosenbaum;Morris Moscovitch;Jonathan K. Foster;David M. Schnyer

  • A role for right medial prefrontal cortex in accurate feeling-of-knowing judgments: evidence from patients with lesions to frontal cortex

    David M Schnyer;Mieke Verfaellie;Michael P Alexander;Michael P Alexander;Ginette LaFleche

  • Association between plasma GFAP concentrations and MRI abnormalities in patients with CT-negative traumatic brain injury in the TRACK-TBI cohort: a prospective multicentre study.

    John K. Yue;Esther L. Yuh;Frederick K. Korley;Ethan A. Winkler

  • Outcome Prediction after Mild and Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: External Validation of Existing Models and Identification of New Predictors Using the TRACK-TBI Pilot Study

    Hester F. Lingsma;John K. Yue;Andrew I.R. Maas;Ewout W. Steyerberg

  • With Age Comes Wisdom Decision Making in Younger and Older Adults

    Darrell A. Worthy;Marissa A. Gorlick;Jennifer L. Pacheco;David M. Schnyer

  • Resting-state functional connectivity alterations associated with six-month outcomes in mild traumatic brain injury

    Eva M. Palacios;Esther L. Yuh;Esther L. Yuh;Yi Shin Chang;John K. Yue;John K. Yue

  • RAPID COMMUNICATION A Critical Role for the Anterior Hippocampus in Relational Memory: Evidence From an fMRI Study Comparing Associative and Item Recognition

    Kelly Sullivan Giovanello;David M. Schnyer;Mieke Verfaellie

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher G. Beevers
Christopher G. Beevers The University of Texas at Austin
Mieke Verfaellie
Mieke Verfaellie Boston University
W. Todd Maddox
W. Todd Maddox The University of Texas at Austin
Murray B. Stein
Murray B. Stein University of California, San Diego
Joel H. Kramer
Joel H. Kramer University of California, San Francisco
John J.B. Allen
John J.B. Allen University of Arizona
Angelle M. Sander
Angelle M. Sander Baylor College of Medicine
William P. Milberg
William P. Milberg Boston University
Ian G. Dobbins
Ian G. Dobbins Washington University in St. Louis
Regina E. McGlinchey
Regina E. McGlinchey Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology can open doors to a diverse range of career opportunities across various fields. For those interested in serving the nation, civilian military psychologist jobs offer the chance to support the mental well-being of military personnel and veterans, a field that continues to grow in demand.

Another evolving area is neuropsychology, which blends brain science with clinical assessment. If you're fascinated by the connection between the brain and behavior, exploring neuropsychology jobs may align with your interests, offering opportunities in research, hospitals, and rehabilitation centers.

For those drawn to the corporate world, studying organizational psychology can lead to roles focused on improving workplace culture and employee satisfaction. The organizational psychologist salary is also a motivating factor, offering competitive compensation and strong job stability.

Before choosing your path, it’s vital to consider both the rewards and hurdles. Discover what are the benefits of being a psychologist to help you weigh your options and make an informed decision about your future.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Schnyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles