World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Materials Science 55 8533 8241 342 324 161 12086

Silvestre T. Pinho publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Silvestre T. Pinho between 2002 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Silvestre T. Pinho published across 20 years, from 2002 to 2021, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2012. 15 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2012. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 5 publications
2002 2021

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Silvestre T. Pinho: publications per year, 2002 to 2021
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 3
2005 2
2006 4
2007 2
2008 5
2009 4
2010 6
2011 12
2012 21
2013 15
2014 13
2015 9
2016 12
2017 9
2018 8
2019 17
2020 10
2021 5
Total 158
Download as CSV

Silvestre T. Pinho publication distribution in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Materials Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvestre T. Pinho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 50–69 to 1,163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 891. Most scientists, 891, have 190–209 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 150–169 publications, is where this scientist sits. 50–69 publications: 28 scientists 70–89 publications: 152 scientists 90–109 publications: 356 scientists 110–129 publications: 487 scientists 130–149 publications: 723 scientists 150–169 publications: 835 scientists 170–189 publications: 850 scientists 190–209 publications: 891 scientists 210–229 publications: 862 scientists 230–249 publications: 766 scientists 250–269 publications: 726 scientists 270–289 publications: 665 scientists 290–309 publications: 593 scientists 310–329 publications: 537 scientists 330–349 publications: 477 scientists 350–369 publications: 440 scientists 370–389 publications: 356 scientists 390–409 publications: 321 scientists 410–429 publications: 256 scientists 430–449 publications: 246 scientists 450–469 publications: 216 scientists 470–489 publications: 212 scientists 490–509 publications: 174 scientists 510–529 publications: 194 scientists 530–549 publications: 162 scientists 550–569 publications: 131 scientists 570–589 publications: 111 scientists 590–609 publications: 103 scientists 610–629 publications: 99 scientists 630–649 publications: 77 scientists 650–669 publications: 92 scientists 670–689 publications: 56 scientists 690–709 publications: 53 scientists 710–729 publications: 53 scientists 730–749 publications: 38 scientists 750–769 publications: 52 scientists 770–789 publications: 43 scientists 790–809 publications: 38 scientists 810–829 publications: 34 scientists 830–849 publications: 25 scientists 850–869 publications: 18 scientists 870–889 publications: 20 scientists 890–909 publications: 24 scientists 910–929 publications: 27 scientists 930–949 publications: 20 scientists 950–969 publications: 17 scientists 970–989 publications: 10 scientists 990–1,009 publications: 16 scientists 1,010–1,029 publications: 13 scientists 1,030–1,049 publications: 12 scientists 1,050–1,069 publications: 9 scientists 1,070–1,089 publications: 8 scientists 1,090–1,109 publications: 7 scientists 1,110–1,129 publications: 9 scientists 1,130–1,149 publications: 2 scientists 1,150–1,162 publications: 5 scientists 1,163+ publications: 100 scientists
50–69 publications 1,163+

This scientist: 161 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,163 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
50–69 28
70–89 152
90–109 356
110–129 487
130–149 723
150–169 835 161
170–189 850
190–209 891
210–229 862
230–249 766
250–269 726
270–289 665
290–309 593
310–329 537
330–349 477
350–369 440
370–389 356
390–409 321
410–429 256
430–449 246
450–469 216
470–489 212
490–509 174
510–529 194
530–549 162
550–569 131
570–589 111
590–609 103
610–629 99
630–649 77
650–669 92
670–689 56
690–709 53
710–729 53
730–749 38
750–769 52
770–789 43
790–809 38
810–829 34
830–849 25
850–869 18
870–889 20
890–909 24
910–929 27
930–949 20
950–969 17
970–989 10
990–1,009 16
1,010–1,029 13
1,030–1,049 12
1,050–1,069 9
1,070–1,089 8
1,090–1,109 7
1,110–1,129 9
1,130–1,149 2
1,150–1,162 5
1,163+ 100
Download as CSV

Silvestre T. Pinho D-index placement in Materials Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Materials Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvestre T. Pinho sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 165+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 667. Most scientists, 667, have 52–53 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 211 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 450 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 612 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 612 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 598 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 657 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 667 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 621 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 597 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 610 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 587 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 606 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 533 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 490 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 469 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 378 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 421 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 359 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 323 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 299 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 230 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 210 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 195 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 203 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 175 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 175 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 142 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 121 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 117 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 107 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 88 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 85 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 68 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 62 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 57 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 45 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 49 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 50 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 34 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 38 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 28 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 24 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 33 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 28 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 20 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 23 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 17 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 12 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 17 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 21 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 13 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 11 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 13 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 4 scientists 164 D-Index: 3 scientists 165+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 165+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 165 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Materials Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 12,847 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 211
42–43 450
44–45 612
46–47 612
48–49 598
50–51 657
52–53 667
54–55 621 55
56–57 597
58–59 610
60–61 587
62–63 606
64–65 533
66–67 490
68–69 469
70–71 378
72–73 421
74–75 359
76–77 323
78–79 299
80–81 230
82–83 210
84–85 195
86–87 203
88–89 175
90–91 175
92–93 142
94–95 121
96–97 117
98–99 107
100–101 88
102–103 85
104–105 68
106–107 62
108–109 57
110–111 45
112–113 49
114–115 50
116–117 34
118–119 38
120–121 37
122–123 29
124–125 28
126–127 24
128–129 33
130–131 28
132–133 21
134–135 20
136–137 23
138–139 17
140–141 12
142–143 17
144–145 21
146–147 13
148–149 11
150–151 14
152–153 13
154–155 9
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 4
162–163 4
164 3
165+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Composite material
  • Quantum mechanics
  • Finite element method

Silvestre T. Pinho mainly focuses on Composite material, Finite element method, Epoxy, Composite number and Ultimate tensile strength. His Constitutive equation research extends to the thematically linked field of Composite material. His Finite element method research integrates issues from Matrix, Delamination, Fracture mechanics and Computer simulation.

The concepts of his Ultimate tensile strength study are interwoven with issues in Compressive strength, Fracture toughness and Failure mode and effects analysis. His work deals with themes such as Damage tolerance, Astm standard, Laminated composites and Tension, which intersect with Fracture toughness. Silvestre T. Pinho interconnects Element, Polynomial and Compression in the investigation of issues within Fracture.

His most cited work include:

  • Recycling carbon fibre reinforced polymers for structural applications: technology review and market outlook. (430 citations)
  • Physically-based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking: Part I: Development (344 citations)
  • Fracture toughness of the tensile and compressive fibre failure modes in laminated composites (338 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Silvestre T. Pinho mostly deals with Composite material, Finite element method, Structural engineering, Composite number and Epoxy. Ultimate tensile strength, Fracture toughness, Delamination, Micromechanics and Fracture are the core of his Composite material study. His work in the fields of Finite element method, such as Extended finite element method, overlaps with other areas such as Parametric statistics.

His Structural engineering research includes themes of Matrix and Kinematics. His Composite number research includes elements of Work, Stiffness and Reinforcement. The study incorporates disciplines such as Fractography, Compressive strength and Plasticity in addition to Epoxy.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Composite material (77.53%)
  • Finite element method (31.46%)
  • Structural engineering (30.34%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2018)?

  • Composite material (77.53%)
  • Braid (3.37%)
  • Finite element method (31.46%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Silvestre T. Pinho mainly investigates Composite material, Braid, Finite element method, Ultimate tensile strength and Fracture mechanics. His research links Nesting with Composite material. His research integrates issues of Transverse plane, Stress, Digital image correlation, Failure mode and effects analysis and Catastrophic failure in his study of Ultimate tensile strength.

In his research, Fatigue loading and Shear stress is intimately related to Delamination, which falls under the overarching field of Fracture mechanics. His work in Composite number addresses issues such as Impact resistance, which are connected to fields such as Flexural strength. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Matrix, Kinematics, Quasistatic process and Fiber pull-out.

Between 2014 and 2018, his most popular works were:

  • Modeling delamination migration in cross-ply tape laminates (54 citations)
  • Damage and failure of triaxial braided composites under multi-axial stress states (32 citations)
  • The importance of translaminar fracture toughness for the penetration impact behaviour of woven carbon/glass hybrid composites (21 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Composite material
  • Quantum mechanics
  • Algorithm

His main research concerns Composite material, Composite number, Impact resistance, Impact test and Penetration. His study in Braid and Crack closure falls under the purview of Composite material. His Braid research incorporates themes from Transverse plane, Stress, Digital image correlation, Failure mode and effects analysis and Catastrophic failure.

His Catastrophic failure study incorporates themes from Ultimate tensile strength and Fiber bundle. His research in Crack closure intersects with topics in Matrix and Delamination. His Composite number research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Fracture toughness and Flexural strength.

Best Publications

  • Recycling carbon fibre reinforced polymers for structural applications: technology review and market outlook.

    Soraia Pimenta;Silvestre T. Pinho

  • Fracture toughness of the tensile and compressive fibre failure modes in laminated composites

    S.T. Pinho;P. Robinson;L. Iannucci

  • On acoustic emission for failure investigation in CFRP: Pattern recognition and peak frequency analyses

    R. Gutkin;C.J. Green;S. Vangrattanachai;S.T. Pinho

  • Prediction of in situ strengths and matrix cracking in composites under transverse tension and in-plane shear

    Pedro P. Camanho;Carlos G. Dávila;Silvestre T. Pinho;Lorenzo Iannucci

  • Physically based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking. Part II: FE implementation

    S.T. Pinho;L. Iannucci;P. Robinson

  • Failure Models and Criteria for Frp Under In-Plane or Three-Dimensional Stress States Including Shear Non-Linearity

    Silvestre T. Pinho;C. G. Davila;P. P. Camanho;L. Iannucci

  • Generation of random distribution of fibres in long-fibre reinforced composites

    Antonio R Melro;P. P. Camanho;P. P. Camanho;S. T. Pinho

  • Micromechanical analysis of polymer composites reinforced by unidirectional fibres: Part I – Constitutive modelling

    A.R. Melro;P.P. Camanho;F.M. Andrade Pires;S.T. Pinho

  • Micromechanical analysis of polymer composites reinforced by unidirectional fibres: Part II – Micromechanical analyses

    Antonio R Melro;P. P. Camanho;F. M. Andrade Pires;S. T. Pinho

  • Translaminar fracture toughness testing of composites: A review

    M.J. Laffan;S.T. Pinho;P. Robinson;A.J. McMillan;A.J. McMillan

  • Material and structural response of polymer-matrix fibre-reinforced composites: Part B:

    ST Pinho;GM Vyas;P Robinson

  • A micromechanical model for kink-band formation: Part I — experimental study and numerical modelling

    S. Pimenta;R. Gutkin;S.T. Pinho;P. Robinson

  • Formulation and implementation of decohesion elements in an explicit finite element code

    S.T. Pinho;L. Iannucci;P. Robinson

  • Numerical analysis of size effects on open-hole tensile composite laminates

    B.Y. Chen;B.Y. Chen;T.E. Tay;P.M. Baiz;S.T. Pinho

  • A floating node method for the modelling of discontinuities in composites

    B.Y. Chen;B.Y. Chen;S.T. Pinho;N.V. De Carvalho;P.M. Baiz

  • Measurement of the in situ ply fracture toughness associated with mode I fibre tensile failure in FRP. Part I: Data reduction

    M.J. Laffan;S.T. Pinho;P. Robinson;L. Iannucci

  • On the transition from shear-driven fibre compressive failure to fibre kinking in notched CFRP laminates under longitudinal compression

    R. Gutkin;S.T. Pinho;P. Robinson;P.T. Curtis

  • Measurement of the in situ ply fracture toughness associated with mode I fibre tensile failure in FRP. Part II: Size and lay-up effects

    M.J. Laffan;S.T. Pinho;P. Robinson;L. Iannucci

  • The effect of recycling on the mechanical response of carbon fibres and their composites

    Soraia Pimenta;Silvestre T. Pinho

  • A micromechanical model for kink-band formation: Part II—Analytical modelling

    S. Pimenta;R. Gutkin;S.T. Pinho;P. Robinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Robinson
Paul Robinson Imperial College London
Pedro P. Camanho
Pedro P. Camanho University of Porto
Lorenzo Iannucci
Lorenzo Iannucci Imperial College London
Brian Falzon
Brian Falzon RMIT University
Tong Earn Tay
Tong Earn Tay National University of Singapore
Carlos G. Davila
Carlos G. Davila Langley Research Center
Rafael Palacios
Rafael Palacios Imperial College London
Stephen Pickering
Stephen Pickering University of Nottingham
M.F.S.F. de Moura
M.F.S.F. de Moura University of Porto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Silvestre T. Pinho

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles