World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Brian Falzon

Brian Falzon

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 46 5194 5002 272 268 282 7630

Brian Falzon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brian Falzon between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brian Falzon published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2019. 14 of the 292 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2019. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 10 publications
1993 2025

292 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brian Falzon: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 0
1995 2
1996 4
1997 3
1998 0
1999 2
2000 1
2001 3
2002 2
2003 5
2004 8
2005 7
2006 8
2007 12
2008 12
2009 9
2010 5
2011 5
2012 8
2013 14
2014 8
2015 14
2016 10
2017 23
2018 26
2019 27
2020 19
2021 10
2022 13
2023 16
2024 4
2025 10
Total 292
Download as CSV

Brian Falzon publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Falzon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 278–287 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 282 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242 282
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Brian Falzon D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian Falzon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301 46
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Brian Falzon is affiliated with RMIT University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering, with a focus on mechanics of materials, mechanical engineering, polymers and plastics, materials chemistry, and building and construction. Their research encompasses a wide range of studies within these domains.

The primary topics of Brian Falzon's research include:

  • Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
  • Advanced machining processes and optimization
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
  • Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
  • Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

Brian Falzon has published numerous papers in several key journals. Their frequent publication venues are:

  • Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing
  • Composites Part B Engineering
  • Composite Structures
  • Composites Science and Technology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Some recent papers authored by Brian Falzon are:

  • Process characteristics, damage mechanisms and challenges in machining of fibre reinforced thermoplastic polymer (FRTP) composites: A review, 2024, Composites Part B Engineering
  • Towards understanding the hole making performance and chip formation mechanism of thermoplastic carbon fibre/polyetherketoneketone composite, 2022, Composites Part B Engineering
  • Synergistic enhancement of fracture toughness in multiphase epoxy matrices modified by thermoplastic and carbon nanotubes, 2020, Composites Science and Technology
  • Temperature field evolution and thermal-mechanical interaction induced damage in drilling of thermoplastic CF/PEKK - A comparative study with thermoset CF/epoxy, 2023, Journal of Manufacturing Processes
  • Comparison of different quasi-static loading conditions of additively manufactured composite hexagonal and auxetic cellular structures, 2022, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • G. Catalanotti
  • Dan Sun
  • Jia Ge
  • Colm Higgins
  • Yan Jin

Best Publications

  • A progressive failure model for composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact damage

    M. V. Donadon;L. Iannucci;B. G. Falzon;J. M. Hodgkinson

  • Predicting low velocity impact damage and Compression-After-Impact (CAI) behaviour of composite laminates

    Wei Tan;Brian Falzon;Louis Ngai-Sum Chiu;Mark Price

  • Predicting low-velocity impact damage on a stiffened composite panel

    Andrea Faggiani;Brian Falzon

  • Structural testing and numerical simulation of a 34 m composite wind turbine blade

    F. M. Jensen;Brian Falzon;J. Ankersen;H. Stang

  • Delamination threshold load for dynamic impact on plates

    Robin Olsson;Mauricio V. Donadon;Brian G. Falzon

  • Experimental and numerical studies on the impact response of damage-tolerant hybrid unidirectional/woven carbon-fibre reinforced composite laminates

    Haibao Liu;Brian G. Falzon;Wei Tan

  • Numerical analysis of intralaminar failure mechanisms in composite structures, Part I: FE implementation

    Brian Falzon;Paola Apruzzese

  • An advanced anti-icing/de-icing system utilizing highly aligned carbon nanotube webs

    Xudan Yao;Stephen C. Hawkins;Stephen C. Hawkins;Brian G. Falzon

  • The role of interfacial properties on the intralaminar and interlaminar damage behaviour of unidirectional composite laminates: Experimental characterization and multiscale modelling

    W. Tan;F. Naya;L. Yang;L. Yang;T. Chang

  • Postbuckling behaviour of a blade-stiffened composite panel loaded in uniaxial compression

    B.G Falzon;K.A Stevens;G.O Davies

  • Process characteristics, damage mechanisms and challenges in machining of fibre reinforced thermoplastic polymer (FRTP) composites: A review

    Unknown

  • Predicting the Compression-After-Impact (CAI) strength of damage-tolerant hybrid unidirectional/woven carbon-fibre reinforced composite laminates

    Haibao Liu;Brian G. Falzon;Wei Tan

  • Stiffener debonding mechanisms in post-buckled CFRP aerospace panels

    Charlotte Meeks;Emile Greenhalgh;Brian G. Falzon

  • Crush responses of composite cylinder under quasi-static and dynamic loading

    Louis Ngai Sum Chiu;Brian Falzon;Dong Ruan;Shanqing Xu

  • Modelling the crush behaviour of thermoplastic composites

    Wei Tan;Brian G. Falzon

  • An investigation of Mode I and Mode II fracture toughness enhancement using aligned carbon nanotubes forests at the crack interface

    Brian Falzon;Stephen Charles Hawkins;Chi Huynh;Racim Radjef

  • Towards understanding the hole making performance and chip formation mechanism of thermoplastic carbon fibre/polyetherketoneketone (CF/PEKK) composite

    Unknown

  • Numerical analysis of intralaminar failure mechanisms in composite structures, Part II: Applications

    Brian Falzon;Paola Apruzzese

  • Finite element modelling of composite structures under crushing load

    Louis Ngai Sum Chiu;Brian Falzon;Romain Boman;Bernard Chen

  • A 3-D micromechanical model for predicting the elastic behaviour of woven laminates

    Mauricio V. Donadon;Brian G. Falzon;Lorenzo Iannucci;John M. Hodgkinson

  • Modelling the nonlinear behaviour and fracture process of AS4/PEKK thermoplastic composite under shear loading

    Wei Tan;Brian G. Falzon

  • Modelling matrix damage and fibre-matrix interfacial decohesion in composite laminates via a multi-fibre multi-layer representative volume element (M2RVE)

    Ganesh G Soni;Ramesh Kumar Singh;Mira Mitra;Brian Falzon

  • Development and evaluation of a novel integrated anti-icing/de-icing technology for carbon fibre composite aerostructures using an electro-conductive textile

    Brian G. Falzon;Paul Robinson;Sabine Frenz;Brian Gilbert

  • Intralaminar toughness characterisation of unbalanced hybrid plain weave laminates

    Mauricio V. Donadon;Brian G. Falzon;Lorenzo Iannucci;John M. Hodgkinson

  • Synergistic enhancement of fracture toughness in multiphase epoxy matrices modified by thermoplastic and carbon nanotubes

    Hong Ma;M. Ali Aravand;Brian G. Falzon

  • Predicting the crushing behaviour of composite material using high-fidelity finite element modelling

    Wei Tan;Brian G. Falzon;Mark Price

Frequent Co-Authors

Davide Mariotti
Davide Mariotti University of Ulster
Dan Sun
Dan Sun Queen's University Belfast
Wenyi Yan
Wenyi Yan Monash University
Lorenzo Iannucci
Lorenzo Iannucci Imperial College London
Grant P. Steven
Grant P. Steven University of Sydney
Silvestre T. Pinho
Silvestre T. Pinho Imperial College London
Mark Christopher Thompson
Mark Christopher Thompson Monash University
John P. Dear
John P. Dear Imperial College London
Bamber R.K. Blackman
Bamber R.K. Blackman Imperial College London
Xinhua Wu
Xinhua Wu Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for flexible online degrees continues to grow among students aiming for careers in engineering and technology. Many learners are seeking programs that fit with their unique schedules, such as online school for moms, which are specifically designed to support parents balancing family and academic goals.

Time-efficient study methods are also in high demand. Programs offering 6 week courses allow students to accelerate their education and enter the job market sooner. This is particularly appealing for professionals looking to quickly upskill or pivot career paths in dynamic sectors such as technology or engineering.

For those interested in merging technology with business or finance, options like online finance degree programs and advanced management tracks such as the 6 month mba open doors to specialized roles or leadership opportunities. These accelerated programs help candidates stay competitive without the need to pause their careers for extended periods.

With so many online pathways available, students can tailor their engineering and technology journey according to their lifestyle, professional ambitions, and timelines.

Best Scientists Citing Brian Falzon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles