World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
89
Citations
31452
World Ranking
1141
National Ranking
590

Pratik Mukherjee publications per year

1979: 1 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publications 1996: 1 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 31 publications 2025: 30 publications
1979 2025

378 publications in total across all disciplines

Pratik Mukherjee publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Pratik Mukherjee sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 293 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Pratik Mukherjee D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Pratik Mukherjee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pratik Mukherjee is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the medical field, with specific expertise in epidemiology, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, cognitive neuroscience, and emergency medicine.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies

Frequent publication venues for Mukherjee's work include:

  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Neurosurgery
  • JAMA Network Open
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition

Recurring co-authors in their research collaborations are Geoffrey T. Manley, Esther L. Yuh, John K. Yue, David O. Okonkwo, and Sonia Jain.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Mukherjee include:

  • Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research, 2022, The Lancet Neurology
  • Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study, 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • The evolution of white matter microstructural changes after mild traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal DTI and NODDI study, 2020, Science Advances
  • Diagnosing Level of Consciousness: The Limits of the Glasgow Coma Scale Total Score, 2021, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Prognostic value of day-of-injury plasma GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations for predicting functional recovery after traumatic brain injury in patients from the US TRACK-TBI cohort: an observational cohort study, 2022, The Lancet Neurology

Best Publications

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Agenesis of the corpus callosum: genetic, developmental and functional aspects of connectivity

    Lynn K. Paul;Warren S. Brown;Ralph Adolphs;J. Michael Tyszka

  • Extent of Microstructural White Matter Injury in Postconcussive Syndrome Correlates with Impaired Cognitive Reaction Time : A 3T Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

    S.N. Niogi;P. Mukherjee;J. Ghajar;C. Johnson

  • Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging and Fiber Tractography: Theoretic Underpinnings

    P. Mukherjee;J.I. Berman;S.W. Chung;C.P. Hess

  • ENIGMA and global neuroscience: A decade of large-scale studies of the brain in health and disease across more than 40 countries

    Paul M Thompson;Neda Jahanshad;Christopher R K Ching;Lauren E Salminen

  • Symptomatology and Functional Outcome in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Results from the Prospective TRACK-TBI Study

    Paul McMahon;Paul McMahon;Allison Hricik;John K. Yue;Ava M. Puccio

  • Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of gray and white matter development during normal human brain maturation.

    Pratik Mukherjee;Jeffrey H. Miller;Joshua S. Shimony;Joseph V. Philip

  • Normal brain maturation during childhood: developmental trends characterized with diffusion-tensor MR imaging.

    P. Mukherjee;J. H. Miller;Joshua Shimony;Thomas Conturo

  • Early brain injury in premature newborns detected with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with adverse early neurodevelopmental outcome.

    Steven P. Miller;Donna M. Ferriero;Carol Leonard;Robert Piecuch

  • Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: technical considerations.

    P. Mukherjee;S.W. Chung;J.I. Berman;C.P. Hess

  • Evaluating pediatric brain tumor cellularity with diffusion-tensor imaging.

    Karen M. Gauvain;Robert C. McKinstry;Pratik Mukherjee;Arie Perry

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of normal and injured developing human brain - a technical review

    J Neil;J Miller;P Mukherjee;Petra Susan Hüppi;Petra Susan Hüppi

  • Acute Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury: Relationship between Plasma Levels of Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 and Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein

    Ramon Diaz-Arrastia;Kevin K.W. Wang;Linda Papa;Marco D. Sorani

  • Diffusion tensor imaging of mild traumatic brain injury.

    Sumit N. Niogi;Pratik Mukherjee

  • Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury

    Esther L. Yuh;Pratik Mukherjee;Hester F. Lingsma;John K. Yue

  • Recovery After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients Presenting to US Level I Trauma Centers: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) Study.

    Lindsay D. Nelson;Nancy R. Temkin;Sureyya Dikmen;Jason Barber

  • Structural dissociation of attentional control and memory in adults with and without mild traumatic brain injury.

    Sumit N. Niogi;Pratik Mukherjee;Jamshid Ghajar;Carl E. Johnson

  • Diffusion tensor imaging: serial quantitation of white matter tract maturity in premature newborns.

    Savannah C Partridge;Pratik Mukherjee;Roland G Henry;Steven P Miller

  • Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Pilot: Multicenter Implementation of the Common Data Elements for Traumatic Brain Injury

    John K. Yue;Mary J. Vassar;Hester F. Lingsma;Shelly R. Cooper

  • MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging of sequential studies in neonates with encephalopathy

    A.J. Barkovich;S.P. Miller;A. Bartha;N. Newton

  • Focal lesions in acute mild traumatic brain injury and neurocognitive outcome: CT versus 3T MRI.

    Hana Lee;Max Wintermark;Alisa D. Gean;Jamshid Ghajar

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey T. Manley
Geoffrey T. Manley University of California, San Francisco
David O. Okonkwo
David O. Okonkwo University of Pittsburgh
Adam R. Ferguson
Adam R. Ferguson University of California, San Francisco
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia University of Pennsylvania
Hester F. Lingsma
Hester F. Lingsma Erasmus University Rotterdam
David M. Schnyer
David M. Schnyer The University of Texas at Austin
Daniel B. Vigneron
Daniel B. Vigneron University of California, San Francisco
Nancy R. Temkin
Nancy R. Temkin University of Washington
Kevin K. W. Wang
Kevin K. W. Wang Morehouse School of Medicine
Joseph T. Giacino
Joseph T. Giacino Massachusetts General Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in neuroscience, there are many flexible online learning options that can expand your career opportunities. From short-term online certificate programs to comprehensive degrees, pursuing related credentials online can fit into a busy schedule.

Some students choose online degree programs that may offer more approachable curricula and quicker completion times. This is ideal if you want to enter the workforce sooner or pair neuroscience with another field. For those focusing on mental health careers, exploring online msw programs can provide a strong foundation, often leading to roles in counseling, research, or healthcare administration.

Additionally, students who are interested in behavioral neuroscience or working with individuals with autism may consider a bcba degree. These programs help prepare graduates for Board Certified Behavior Analyst roles, which are both in high demand and impactful. Exploring these online pathways can help you find the right fit for your neuroscience interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Pratik Mukherjee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles