World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 64 2914 2675 1674 1503 100 21661

Hugh W. Catts publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hugh W. Catts between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hugh W. Catts published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2005. 12 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2005. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 4 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 8 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications
1982 2025

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hugh W. Catts: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 4
1985 0
1986 4
1987 2
1988 1
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 0
1993 3
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 3
2000 3
2001 4
2002 3
2003 3
2004 1
2005 8
2006 3
2007 2
2008 2
2009 6
2010 1
2011 3
2012 2
2013 0
2014 2
2015 7
2016 3
2017 3
2018 3
2019 1
2020 4
2021 4
2022 2
2023 1
2024 6
2025 6
Total 116
Download as CSV

Hugh W. Catts publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugh W. Catts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 100
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Hugh W. Catts D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hugh W. Catts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 64
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Hugh W. Catts is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a focus on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability, Clinical Psychology, and Safety Research.

The main topics of Catts' work include Reading and Literacy Development, Cognitive and Developmental Aspects of Mathematical Skills, Early Childhood Education and Development, Language Development and Disorders, Parental Involvement in Education, Child Development and Digital Technology, and Disability Education and Employment.

Catts has published recent papers in several scholarly journals. Notable publications include:

  • "How the Science of Reading Informs 21st-Century Education," 2020, Reading Research Quarterly
  • "A Cumulative Risk and Resilience Model of Dyslexia," 2021, Journal of Learning Disabilities
  • "Revisiting the definition of dyslexia," 2024, Annals of Dyslexia
  • "Predicting Dyslexia in Children With Developmental Language Disorder," 2020, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • "Commentary: The critical role of oral language deficits in reading disorders: reflections on Snowling and Hulme (2021)," 2021, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Catts include:

  • Yaacov Petscher
  • Donald L. Compton
  • Christopher J. Lonigan
  • Laura M. Steacy
  • Nicole Patton Terry

Their studies have appeared mainly in journals such as:

  • Reading Research Quarterly
  • Journal of Learning Disabilities
  • Annals of Dyslexia
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Catts' research addresses key issues related to dyslexia, reading science, and language disorders through empirical studies and theoretical models. This includes investigating risk and resilience factors affecting dyslexia as well as the connections between oral language deficits and reading disorders.

Best Publications

  • A Longitudinal Investigation of Reading Outcomes in Children with Language Impairments.

    Hugh W. Catts;Marc E. Fey;J. Bruce Tomblin;Xuyang Zhang

  • Language Deficits in Poor Comprehenders: A Case for the Simple View of Reading

    Hugh W. Catts;Suzanne M. Adlof;Susan Ellis Weismer

  • Language Basis of Reading and Reading Disabilities: Evidence From a Longitudinal Investigation

    Hugh W. Catts;Marc E. Fey;Xuyang Zhang;J. Bruce Tomblin

  • The Relationship Between Speech-Language Impairments and Reading Disabilities

    Hugh W. Catts

  • Are Specific Language Impairment and Dyslexia Distinct Disorders

    Hugh W. Catts;Suzanne M. Adlof;Tiffany P. Hogan;Susan Ellis Weismer

  • Estimating the Risk of Future Reading Difficulties in Kindergarten Children: A Research-Based Model and Its Clinical Implementation.

    Hugh W. Catts;Marc E. Fey;Xuyang Zhang;J. Bruce Tomblin

  • Language and Reading Disabilities

    Hugh William Catts;Alan G. Kamhi

  • The Connections between Language and Reading Disabilities

    Hugh William Catts;Alan G. Kamhi

  • Subgrouping Poor Readers on the Basis of Individual Differences in Reading-Related Abilities

    Hugh W. Catts;Tiffany P. Hogan;Marc E. Fey

  • Oral and Written Story Composition Skills of Children With Language Impairment

    Marc E. Fey;Hugh W. Catts;Kerry Proctor-Williams;J. Bruce Tomblin

  • The Association of Reading Disability, Behavioral Disorders, and Language Impairment among Second-grade Children

    J. Bruce Tomblin;Xuyang Zhang;Paula Buckwalter;Hugh Catts

  • Toward an understanding of developmental language and reading disorders.

    Alan G. Kamhi;Hugh W. Catts

  • Developmental Changes in Reading and Reading Disabilities

    Hugh W. Catts;Tiffany P. Hogan;Suzanne M. Adlof

  • The Role of Speed of Processing, Rapid Naming, and Phonological Awareness in Reading Achievement

    Hugh W. Catts;Matthew Gillispie;Laurence B. Leonard;Robert V. Kail

  • Predicting, Explaining, and Preventing Children's Reading Difficulties†

    Peggy McCardle;Hollis S. Scarborough;Hugh W. Catts

  • Should the Simple View of Reading Include a Fluency Component

    Suzanne M. Adlof;Hugh W. Catts;Todd D. Little

  • The Relationship Between Phonological Awareness and Reading: Implications for the Assessment of Phonological Awareness

    Tiffany P. Hogan;Hugh W. Catts;Todd D. Little

  • The Role of Phonological Processing in Early Reading Ability: What We Can Learn From Chinese

    Chieh-Fang Hu;Hugh W. Catts

  • Reading Achievement Growth in Children With Language Impairments

    Hugh W. Catts;Mindy Sittner Bridges;Todd D. Little;J. Bruce Tomblin

  • Speech Production/Phonological Deficits in Reading-Disordered Children

    Hugh W. Catts

  • Early Reading Achievement in Children With Expressive Phonological Disorders

    Linda S. Larrivee;Hugh W. Catts

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan G. Kamhi
Alan G. Kamhi University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Tiffany P. Hogan
Tiffany P. Hogan MGH Institute of Health Professions
Marc E. Fey
Marc E. Fey University of Kansas
J. Bruce Tomblin
J. Bruce Tomblin University of Iowa
Yaacov Petscher
Yaacov Petscher Florida State University
Christopher J. Lonigan
Christopher J. Lonigan Florida State University
Susan Ellis Weismer
Susan Ellis Weismer University of Wisconsin–Madison
Todd D. Little
Todd D. Little Texas Tech University
Donald L. Compton
Donald L. Compton Florida State University
Kate Cain
Kate Cain Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online can open the door to a variety of careers, from counseling and mental health to business or education. When choosing an online degree, it's important to weigh factors like program accreditation, faculty expertise, practical training, and overall value.

For students seeking strong returns on their educational investment, programs ranked for value and outcomes can provide key insights. For instance, the most valuable psychology degree programs ranking in Hawaii highlights the importance of quality and affordability in degree selection.

Likewise, the most valuable psychology programs in Jacksonville and the best value psychology degrees in New Jersey point to growing online options in different regions, each tailored to meet local workforce demands and student needs.

For those interested in larger metropolitan areas, the most valuable psychology programs in New York can offer diverse learning pathways and robust networking opportunities.

Carefully exploring these ranked options can help you pursue an online psychology degree that’s both affordable and aligned with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Hugh W. Catts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles