World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Eric M. Thompson publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric M. Thompson sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Eric M. Thompson D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric M. Thompson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric M. Thompson is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on earth and planetary sciences, with a significant emphasis on engineering. Within these broad fields, Thompson's work concentrates on geophysics and civil and structural engineering, along with contributions to artificial intelligence, management, monitoring, policy and law, and safety, risk, reliability, and quality.

The scientist's research topics encompass several areas related to seismic phenomena and structural analysis. These include earthquake and tectonic studies, seismic performance and analysis, seismic waves and their analysis, seismology and earthquake studies, landslides and related hazards, structural health monitoring techniques, and geotechnical engineering and analysis.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Thompson include Morgan P. Moschetti, David J. Wald, Kate E. Allstadt, Peter M. Powers, and Mark D. Petersen. Their work appears regularly in several publication venues, most notably Earthquake Spectra, Seismological Research Letters, the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, The Seismic Record, and Frontiers in Earth Science.

Recent publications by Eric M. Thompson cover diverse topics in seismic research and include:

  • A global hybrid VS30 map with a topographic slope-based default and regional map insets, 2020, Earthquake Spectra
  • Rapid Characterization of the February 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, Earthquake Sequence, 2023, The Seismic Record
  • The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications, 2023, Earthquake Spectra
  • ShakeMap operations, policies, and procedures, 2021, Earthquake Spectra
  • The 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence Ground Motions: Processed Records and Derived Intensity Metrics, 2020, Seismological Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Shear-Wave Velocity–Based Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential

    R. Kayen;R. E. S. Moss;E. M. Thompson;R. B. Seed

  • Critical Parameters Affecting Bias and Variability in Site‐Response Analyses Using KiK‐net Downhole Array Data

    James Kaklamanos;Brendon A. Bradley;Eric M. Thompson;Laurie G. Baise

  • A taxonomy of site response complexity

    Eric M. Thompson;Laurie G. Baise;Yasuo Tanaka;Robert E. Kayen

  • A global empirical model for near real-time assessment of seismically induced landslides

    M. A. Nowicki Jessee;M. W. Hamburger;K. Allstadt;D. J. Wald

  • Comparison of 1D linear, equivalent-linear, and nonlinear site response models at six KiK-net validation sites

    James Kaklamanos;Laurie G. Baise;Eric M. Thompson;Luis Dorfmann

  • Regional Correlations of VS30 and Velocities Averaged Over Depths Less Than and Greater Than 30 Meters

    David M. Boore;Eric M. Thompson;Héloïse Cadet

  • The 2018 update of the US National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview of model and implications:

    Mark D. Petersen;Allison M. Shumway;Peter M. Powers;Charles S. Mueller

  • An Updated Geospatial Liquefaction Model for Global Application

    Jing Zhu;Laurie G. Baise;Eric M. Thompson

  • Path Durations for Use in the Stochastic‐Method Simulation of Ground Motions

    David M. Boore;Eric M. Thompson

  • Impediments to predicting site response: Seismic property estimation and modeling simplifications

    Eric M. Thompson;Laurie G. Baise;Robert E. Kayen;Bojan B. Guzina

  • A global hybrid VS30 map with a topographic slope–based default and regional map insets:

    David C Heath;David J Wald;C Bruce Worden;Eric M Thompson

  • Development of a globally applicable model for near real-time prediction of seismically induced landslides

    M. Anna Nowicki;M. Anna Nowicki;David J. Wald;Michael W. Hamburger;Michael Hearne

  • Revisions to Some Parameters Used in Stochastic‐Method Simulations of Ground Motion

    David M. Boore;Eric M. Thompson

  • A VS30 Map for California with Geologic and Topographic Constraints

    Eric Thompson;David J. Wald;Charles Worden

  • Spatial and Spectral Interpolation of Ground-Motion Intensity Measure Observations

    C. Bruce Worden;Eric M. Thompson;Jack W. Baker;Brendon A. Bradley;Brendon A. Bradley

  • A Flatfile for the KiK-net Database Processed Using an Automated Protocol

    Haitham M. Dawood;Adrian Rodriguez-Marek;Jeff Bayless;Christine Goulet

  • The 2023 US 50-State National Seismic Hazard Model: Overview and implications

    Unknown

  • A Geospatial Liquefaction Model for Rapid Response and Loss Estimation

    Jing Zhu;Davene Daley;Laurie G. Baise;Eric M. Thompson

  • ShakeMap operations, policies, and procedures:

    David J Wald;C Bruce Worden;Eric M Thompson;Michael Hearne

  • Geotechnical Effects of the 2015 Magnitude 7.8 Gorkha, Nepal, Earthquake and Aftershocks

    Robb E. S. Moss;Eric M. Thompson;D. Scott Kieffer;Binod Tiwari

  • An open repository of earthquake-triggered ground-failure inventories

    Robert G. Schmitt;Hakan Tanyas;M. Anna Nowicki Jessee;Jing Zhu

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Wald
David J. Wald United States Geological Survey
Daniel E. McNamara
Daniel E. McNamara United States Geological Survey
Mark D. Petersen
Mark D. Petersen United States Geological Survey
Randall W. Jibson
Randall W. Jibson United States Geological Survey
David M. Boore
David M. Boore United States Geological Survey
Charles S. Mueller
Charles S. Mueller United States Geological Survey
Brian D. Collins
Brian D. Collins United States Geological Survey
Brendon A. Bradley
Brendon A. Bradley University of Canterbury
Arthur Frankel
Arthur Frankel United States Geological Survey
Richard M. Vogel
Richard M. Vogel Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities that intersect with various fields. For students seeking additional skills, pursuing an online Spanish degree can be a valuable asset. Language proficiency helps in global research collaborations and communication with diverse communities.

Veterans interested in expanding their qualifications might find specialized support through spanish programs online for veterans, tailored to accommodate their unique needs while enriching their career prospects in Earth Science-related fields.

For those inclined towards creative disciplines linked with environmental awareness, affordable options like mfa online programs can enhance artistic skills that complement scientific insights. This combination is increasingly valued in public education and science communication roles.

Additionally, leadership roles within environmental organizations often require strong management skills. Earning an online human resource management masters programs degree can prepare professionals to effectively manage teams and projects while advancing sustainability goals.

Best Scientists Citing Eric M. Thompson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles