United States Geological Survey
United States
Daniel E. McNamara mostly deals with Seismology, Tectonics, Lithosphere, Seismic wave and Mantle. The study incorporates disciplines such as Shear and Shear wave splitting in addition to Seismology. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Continental drift, Basin and range topography and Basin and Range Province.
His Seismic wave research integrates issues from Suture, Partial melting and Terrane. His research on Mantle often connects related areas such as Crust. When carried out as part of a general Fault research project, his work on Strike-slip tectonics is frequently linked to work in Moment tensor, Pawnee and Hazard mitigation, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.
Daniel E. McNamara mainly investigates Seismology, Induced seismicity, Aftershock, Tectonics and Seismic hazard. Daniel E. McNamara works mostly in the field of Seismology, limiting it down to topics relating to Geological survey and, in certain cases, Ambient noise level, as a part of the same area of interest. His work on Hypocenter as part of general Induced seismicity research is frequently linked to Wastewater disposal, Earth and Hazard, thereby connecting diverse disciplines of science.
The Foreshock research he does as part of his general Aftershock study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Subspace topology, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science. In general Tectonics study, his work on Lithosphere and Basin and Range Province often relates to the realm of Amplitude, thereby connecting several areas of interest. His research investigates the connection between Lithosphere and topics such as Mantle that intersect with problems in Terrane and Suture.
Daniel E. McNamara spends much of his time researching Seismology, Seismic hazard, Ground motion, Geological survey and Natural. His Seismology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Earthquake magnitude and Remote sensing. As a part of the same scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Seismic hazard, focusing on Tectonics and, on occasion, Volcano.
Daniel E. McNamara has included themes like Inlet and Intermediate depth in his Ground motion study. The concepts of his Geological survey study are interwoven with issues in Probabilistic logic and Sequence. The Sequence study combines topics in areas such as Ambient noise level, Subduction, Large earthquakes and Seismic array.
His primary scientific interests are in Seismology, Natural, Aftershock, Seismic hazard and Earthquake hazard. His Seismology study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Ambient noise level. He interconnects Geological survey, Seismic array, Large earthquakes and Sequence in the investigation of issues within Ambient noise level.
Earthquake hazard and Induced seismicity are commonly linked in his work. His Spatial relationship study spans across into areas like Liquefaction, Interferometric synthetic aperture radar, Surface deformation, Fault slip and Remote sensing. In his study, Daniel E. McNamara carries out multidisciplinary Data quality and Software deployment research.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Ambient Noise Levels in the Continental United States
Daniel E. McNamara;Raymond P. Buland.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2004)
Shear wave anisotropy beneath the Tibetan Plateau
Daniel E. McNamara;Thomas J. Owens;Paul G. Silver;Frances T. Wu.
Journal of Geophysical Research (1994)
Upper mantle velocity structure beneath the Tibetan Plateau from Pn travel time tomography
D. E. McNamara;D. E. McNamara;D. E. McNamara;W. R. Walter;T. J. Owens;C. J. Ammon.
Journal of Geophysical Research (1997)
2017 One‐Year Seismic‐Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes
Mark D. Petersen;Charles S. Mueller;Morgan P. Moschetti;Susan M. Hoover.
Seismological Research Letters (2017)
2018 One‐Year Seismic Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes
Mark D. Petersen;Charles S. Mueller;Morgan P. Moschetti;Susan M. Hoover.
Seismological Research Letters (2018)
Observations of regional phase propagation across the Tibetan Plateau
Daniel E. McNamara;Thomas J. Owens;William R. Walter.
Journal of Geophysical Research (1995)
Azimuthal shear wave velocity anisotropy in the Basin and Range Province using moho Ps converted phases
Daniel E. McNamara;Thomas J. Owens.
Journal of Geophysical Research (1993)
Oklahoma experiences largest earthquake during ongoing regional wastewater injection hazard mitigation efforts
William L. Yeck;Gavin P. Hayes;Daniel E. McNamara;Justin L. Rubinstein.
Geophysical Research Letters (2017)
Earthquake hypocenters and focal mechanisms in central Oklahoma reveal a complex system of reactivated subsurface strike‐slip faulting
Daniel E. McNamara;Harley M. Benz;Robert B. Herrmann;Eric A. Bergman.
Geophysical Research Letters (2015)
Far-field pressurization likely caused one of the largest injection induced earthquakes by reactivating a large preexisting basement fault structure
William L. Yeck;Matthew Weingarten;Harley M. Benz;Daniel E. McNamara.
Geophysical Research Letters (2016)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:
United States Geological Survey
Colorado State University
United States Geological Survey
Saint Louis University
University of South Carolina
University of Colorado Boulder
United States Geological Survey
United States Geological Survey
United States Geological Survey
United States Geological Survey
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Arizona State University
University of Wisconsin–Madison
University of Lorraine
University of Bonn
Lanzhou Institute of Chemical Physics
University of East Anglia
University of Groningen
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Uppsala University
University of California, San Diego
New York University
University of California, Los Angeles
Aarhus University Hospital
University of Bordeaux
University of Virginia