World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guillermo Booth-Rea

Guillermo Booth-Rea

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 33 8507 7902 194 188 167 3254

Guillermo Booth-Rea publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Guillermo Booth-Rea between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Guillermo Booth-Rea published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2012. 9 of the 172 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2012. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
1998 2025

172 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Guillermo Booth-Rea: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 6
2004 7
2005 4
2006 4
2007 2
2008 5
2009 5
2010 5
2011 7
2012 15
2013 12
2014 9
2015 14
2016 12
2017 10
2018 11
2019 9
2020 6
2021 6
2022 8
2023 3
2024 6
2025 3
Total 172
Download as CSV

Guillermo Booth-Rea publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guillermo Booth-Rea sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 158–167 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 167 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458 167
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Guillermo Booth-Rea D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guillermo Booth-Rea sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379 33
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Guillermo Booth-Rea is a researcher affiliated with the University of Granada in Spain, specializing primarily in Earth and Planetary Sciences with a strong emphasis on Geophysics. Their academic work spans multiple subfields including Earth-Surface Processes, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Archeology.

Their research focuses on several key topics: Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide, earthquake and tectonic studies, Geological and Geochemical Analysis, Karst Systems and Hydrogeology, Landslides and related hazards, Archaeological and Historical Studies, and Geological and Tectonic Studies in Latin America.

Booth-Rea has contributed extensively to the scientific community through numerous publications, particularly in journals such as:

  • Tectonics
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Earth-Science Reviews
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Nature Communications

Among their recent papers are:

  • The evolution of the westernmost Mediterranean basins, 2020, Earth-Science Reviews
  • The Lithospheric Structure of the Gibraltar Arc System From Wide-Angle Seismic Data, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Evidence for a developing plate boundary in the western Mediterranean, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Two Cenozoic Extensional Phases in Mallorca and Their Bearing on the Geodynamic Evolution of the Western Mediterranean, 2021, Tectonics
  • Active fault segmentation in Northern Tunisia, 2020, Journal of Structural Geology

Frequent collaborators in Booth-Rea's work include:

  • José Miguel Azañón
  • Patricia Ruano
  • Fetheddine Melki
  • Jorge Pedro Galvé
  • Laura Gómez de la Peña

Best Publications

  • Crustal types and Tertiary tectonic evolution of the Alborán sea, western Mediterranean

    Guillermo Booth-Rea;César R. Ranero;José Miguel Martínez-Martínez;Ingo Grevemeyer

  • Differentiating geology and tectonics using a spatial autocorrelation technique for the hypsometric integral

    J. V. Pérez-Peña;J. M. Azañón;J. M. Azañón;G. Booth-Rea;A. Azor

  • Exhumation, doming and slab retreat in the Betic Cordillera (SE Spain): in situ40Ar/39Ar ages and P–T–d–t paths for the Nevado-Filabride complex

    Romain Augier;Philippe Agard;Patrick Monié;Laurent Jolivet

  • Geomorphic evidence of active tectonics in the Sierra Alhamilla (eastern Betics, SE Spain)

    Flavio Giaconia;Guillermo Booth-Rea;José Miguel Martínez-Martínez;José Miguel Azañón

  • Active transfer fault zone linking a segmented extensional system (Betics, southern Spain): Insight into heterogeneous extension driven by edge delamination

    José Miguel Martínez-Martínez;Guillermo Booth-Rea;José Miguel Azañón;Federico Torcal

  • Slab rupture and delamination under the Betics and Rif constrained from receiver functions

    Flor de Lis Mancilla;Guillermo Booth-Rea;Guillermo Booth-Rea;Daniel Stich;José Vicente Pérez-Peña;José Vicente Pérez-Peña

  • SwathProfiler and NProfiler

    J.V. Prez-Pea;M. Al-Awabdeh;J.M. Azan;J.P. Galve

  • Garnet lherzolite and garnet-spinel mylonite in the Ronda peridotite: Vestiges of Oligocene backarc mantle lithospheric extension in the western Mediterranean

    Carlos J. Garrido;Frederic Gueydan;Guillermo Booth-Rea;Guillermo Booth-Rea;Jacques Precigout

  • Influence of strike-slip fault segmentation on drainage evolution and topography. A case study: the Palomares Fault Zone (southeastern Betics, Spain)

    Guillermo Booth-Rea;José Miguel Azañón;Antonio Azor;Víctor García-Dueñas

  • Deformation and exhumation of the Ronda peridotite (Spain)

    Jacques Précigout;Frédéric Gueydan;Carlos J. Garrido;Nathan Cogné

  • The Alboran volcanic-arc modulated the Messinian faunal exchange and salinity crisis

    Guillermo Booth-Rea;Guillermo Booth-Rea;César R. Ranero;Ingo Grevemeyer

  • The West Melilla cold water coral mounds, Eastern Alboran Sea: Morphological characterization and environmental context

    Claudio Lo Iacono;Claudio Lo Iacono;Eulàlia Gràcia;Cesar R. Ranero;Mikhail Emelianov

  • Contrasting structural and P‐T evolution of tectonic units in the southeastern Betics: Key for understanding the exhumation of the Alboran Domain HP/LT crustal rocks (western Mediterranean)

    Guillermo Booth-Rea;Guillermo Booth-Rea;José Miguel Azañón;José Miguel Martínez-Martínez;O. Vidal

  • Movement along a low‐angle normal fault: The S reflector west of Spain

    T. J. Reston;T. J. Reston;T. Leythaeuser;G. Booth-Rea;D. Sawyer

  • Extensional tectonics in the northeastern Betics (SE Spain): case study of extension in a multilayered upper crust with contrasting rheologies

    Guillermo Booth-Rea;Jose Miguel Azañón;Vı́ctor Garcı́a-Dueñas

  • Backarc basin inversion and subcontinental mantle emplacement in the crust: kilometre-scale folding and shearing at the base of the proto-Alborán lithospheric mantle (Betic Cordillera, southern Spain)

    Károly Hidas;Guillermo Booth-Rea;Guillermo Booth-Rea;Carlos J. Garrido;José Miguel Martínez-Martínez;José Miguel Martínez-Martínez

  • Geomorphic analysis of the Sierra Cabrera, an active pop-up in the constrictional domain of conjugate strike-slip faults: The Palomares and Polopos fault zones (eastern Betics, SE Spain)

    Flavio Giaconia;G. Booth-Rea;G. Booth-Rea;J.M. Martínez-Martínez;J.M. Martínez-Martínez;J.M. Azañón;J.M. Azañón

  • Relief and drainage evolution during the exhumation of the Sierra Nevada (SE Spain): Is denudation keeping pace with uplift?

    J.M. Azañón;J.M. Azañón;J.P. Galve;J.V. Pérez-Peña;F. Giaconia

  • Late Miocene Extensional Collapse of Northern Tunisia

    G. Booth-Rea;G. Booth-Rea;S. Gaidi;F. Melki;W. Marzougui

  • Arc-parallel vs back-arc extension in the Western Gibraltar arc: Is the Gibraltar forearc still active?

    J.C Balanyá;A. Crespo-Blanc;M. Díaz-Aspiroz;I. Expósito

  • Exhumation constraints for the lower Nevado-Filabride Complex (Betic Cordillera, SE Spain): a Raman thermometry and Tweequ multiequilibrium thermobarometry approach

    Romain Augier;Guillermo Booth-Rea;Phillipe Agard;José Miguel Martínez-Martínez

Frequent Co-Authors

José Miguel Azañón
José Miguel Azañón University of Granada
Jorge Pedro Galve
Jorge Pedro Galve University of Granada
Ingo Grevemeyer
Ingo Grevemeyer GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
César R. Ranero
César R. Ranero Spanish National Research Council
Carlos J. Garrido
Carlos J. Garrido Spanish National Research Council
Claudio Marchesi
Claudio Marchesi University of Granada
Antonio Azor
Antonio Azor University of Granada
Romain Augier
Romain Augier University of Orléans
José Alberto Padrón-Navarta
José Alberto Padrón-Navarta Spanish National Research Council
Josep Gallart
Josep Gallart Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which benefit from specialized online degrees. For those interested in complementing their scientific expertise with creative skills, pursuing a master of fine arts online can enhance abilities in scientific visualization and communication.

Professionals aiming to transition into leadership or organizational roles within environmental firms or research institutions may find value in online programs like the best online masters degree in human resource management programs. These degrees strengthen management and HR skills applicable to team-driven scientific projects.

Online education also caters well to learners at any stage of life. The online degree programs for seniors highlight that age is not a barrier, providing flexible options for those pursuing or continuing Earth Science studies later in life.

Moreover, for those interested in library science and information management related to Earth Science data and research, exploring ala accredited mlis programs is a strategic choice. These programs prepare students to manage vast scientific resources efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Guillermo Booth-Rea

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles