World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
9473
World Ranking
6642
National Ranking
2881

Mark A. Kramer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Kramer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 112 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark A. Kramer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Kramer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Kramer is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research intersects multiple domains including Human-Computer Interaction, Health Information Management, Information Systems and Management, and Social Psychology.

Their work spans core topics such as Electronic Health Records Systems, Scientific Computing and Data Management, Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, and Color perception and design.

Recent publications by Mark A. Kramer include:

  • Interoperability with multiple Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR®) profiles and versions, 2023, JAMIA Open
  • Innovating Methods: Observing In Situ Technology Experiences Using Novel Visual Research Methods, 2021, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
  • FHIR "Profiliferation": A Data Science Approach, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Harnessing AI for efficient analysis of complex policy documents: a case study of Executive Order 14110, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Mark A. Kramer has collaborated with several researchers across their projects. Frequent coauthors include Chris Moesel, Sebastian Fajardo, Gert Jan Hofstede, Martijn de Vries, and Andrés Bernal.

Their work has appeared in varied publication venues such as:

  • JAMIA Open
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
  • Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • Dynamic cross-frequency couplings of local field potential oscillations in rat striatum and hippocampus during performance of a T-maze task

    Adriano B. L. Tort;Mark A. Kramer;Catherine Thorn;Daniel J. Gibson

  • Age-Related Changes in 1/f Neural Electrophysiological Noise.

    Bradley Voytek;Mark A. Kramer;John Case;Kyle Q. Lepage

  • Epilepsy as a Disorder of Cortical Network Organization

    Mark A. Kramer;Sydney S. Cash

  • Beyond the connectome: the dynome.

    Nancy J. Kopell;Howard J. Gritton;Miles A. Whittington;Mark A. Kramer

  • Emergent network topology at seizure onset in humans.

    Mark A. Kramer;Eric D. Kolaczyk;Heidi E. Kirsch

  • Coalescence and Fragmentation of Cortical Networks during Focal Seizures

    Mark A. Kramer;Uri T. Eden;Eric D. Kolaczyk;Rodrigo Zepeda

  • Temporal Interactions between Cortical Rhythms

    Anita K. Roopun;Mark A. Kramer;Lucy M. Carracedo;Marcus Kaiser

  • Human seizures self-terminate across spatial scales via a critical transition

    Mark A. Kramer;Wilson Truccolo;Uri T. Eden;Kyle Q. Lepage

  • Sharp edge artifacts and spurious coupling in EEG frequency comodulation measures.

    Mark A. Kramer;Adriano B.L. Tort;Adriano B.L. Tort;Nancy J. Kopell

  • Neuronal assembly dynamics in the beta1 frequency range permits short-term memory

    N. Kopell;M. A. Whittington;M. A. Kramer

  • Are Different Rhythms Good for Different Functions

    Nancy Kopell;Mark A. Kramer;Paola Malerba;Miles A. Whittington

  • Emergence of Stable Functional Networks in Long-Term Human Electroencephalography

    Catherine Jean Chu;Mark R. Kramer;Jay Sriram Pathmanathan;Matt Travis Bianchi

  • Period Concatenation Underlies Interactions between Gamma and Beta Rhythms in Neocortex

    Anita K Roopun;Mark A Kramer;Lucy M Carracedo;Marcus Kaiser

  • Pyramidal cells accumulate chloride at seizure onset.

    Kyle P. Lillis;Mark A. Kramer;Jerome Mertz;Kevin J. Staley

  • Physiology of functional and effective networks in epilepsy

    Robert B. Yaffe;Philip Borger;Pierre Megevand;David M. Groppe

  • Human seizures couple across spatial scales through travelling wave dynamics.

    Louis-Emmanuel Martinet;Grant Fiddyment;J.R. Madsen;E.N. Eskandar

  • Emergence of Persistent Networks in Long-Term Intracranial EEG Recordings

    Mark A. Kramer;Uri T. Eden;Kyle Q. Lepage;Eric D. Kolaczyk

  • Unique contributions of parvalbumin and cholinergic interneurons in organizing striatal networks during movement

    Howard J. Gritton;William M. Howe;William M. Howe;Michael F. Romano;Alexandra G. DiFeliceantonio;Alexandra G. DiFeliceantonio

  • EEG functional connectivity is partially predicted by underlying white matter connectivity.

    C. J. Chu;N. Tanaka;J. Diaz;Brian L. Edlow

  • Rhythm generation through period concatenation in rat somatosensory cortex.

    Mark A. Kramer;Anita K. Roopun;Lucy M. Carracedo;Roger D. Traub

Frequent Co-Authors

Uri T. Eden
Uri T. Eden Boston University
Sydney S. Cash
Sydney S. Cash Harvard University
Nancy Kopell
Nancy Kopell Boston University
Eric D. Kolaczyk
Eric D. Kolaczyk McGill University
Andrew J. Szeri
Andrew J. Szeri University of California, Berkeley
Emad N. Eskandar
Emad N. Eskandar Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Steven M. Stufflebeam
Steven M. Stufflebeam Harvard University
Miles A. Whittington
Miles A. Whittington University of York
Tasso J. Kaper
Tasso J. Kaper Boston University
Roger D. Traub
Roger D. Traub IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Kramer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles