World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
9821
World Ranking
5118
National Ranking
2290

Kathryn A. Davis publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn A. Davis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Kathryn A. Davis D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn A. Davis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kathryn A. Davis is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a significant focus on several subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Neurology.

The main topics of their research include:

  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Davis has published extensively, with frequent contributions in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Epilepsia
  • Neurology
  • Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Brain Communications

The recent papers authored or co-authored by Davis illustrate a focus on neural interfaces, brain stimulation, and neuroimaging:

  • MXene-infused bioelectronic interfaces for multiscale electrophysiology and stimulation (2021, Science Translational Medicine)
  • The effects of direct brain stimulation in humans depend on frequency, amplitude, and white-matter proximity (2020, Brain stimulation)
  • Structure-function coupling in macroscale human brain networks (2024, Nature reviews. Neuroscience)
  • Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Surgical Outcomes Can Be Inferred Based on Structural Connectome Hubs: A Machine Learning Study (2020, Annals of Neurology)
  • 7T Epilepsy Task Force Consensus Recommendations on the Use of 7T MRI in Clinical Practice (2020, Neurology)

Davis collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Brian Litt
  • Joel M. Stein
  • Alfredo Lucas
  • Nishant Sinha
  • Erin C. Conrad

Best Publications

  • Flexible, foldable, actively multiplexed, high-density electrode array for mapping brain activity in vivo

    Jonathan Viventi;Dae Hyeong Kim;Leif Vigeland;Eric S. Frechette

  • Positive and Negative Network Correlations in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

    Hal Blumenfeld;Kelly A. McNally;Susan D. Vanderhill;A. LeBron Paige

  • Closed-loop stimulation of temporal cortex rescues functional networks and improves memory.

    Youssef Ezzyat;Paul A. Wanda;Deborah F. Levy;Allison Kadel

  • Direct Electrical Stimulation of the Human Entorhinal Region and Hippocampus Impairs Memory

    Joshua Jacobs;Jonathan Miller;Sang Ah Lee;Sang Ah Lee;Tom Coffey

  • Direct Brain Stimulation Modulates Encoding States and Memory Performance in Humans

    Youssef Ezzyat;James E. Kragel;John F. Burke;Deborah F. Levy

  • Widespread theta synchrony and high-frequency desynchronization underlies enhanced cognition.

    E. A. Solomon;J. E. Kragel;Michael R. Sperling;Ashwini Sharan

  • Virtual Cortical Resection Reveals Push-Pull Network Control Preceding Seizure Evolution.

    Ankit N. Khambhati;Kathryn A. Davis;Timothy H. Lucas;Brian Litt

  • Glutamate imaging (GluCEST) lateralizes epileptic foci in nonlesional temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Kathryn Adamiak Davis;Ravi Prakash Reddy Nanga;Sandhitsu Das;Stephanie H. Chen

  • Dynamic Network Drivers of Seizure Generation, Propagation and Termination in Human Neocortical Epilepsy.

    Ankit N. Khambhati;Kathryn A. Davis;Brian S. Oommen;Brian S. Oommen;Stephanie H. Chen;Stephanie H. Chen

  • Lateralized hippocampal oscillations underlie distinct aspects of human spatial memory and navigation.

    Jonathan F Miller;Andrew J. Watrous;Melina Eirene Tsitsiklis;Sang Ah Lee

  • Sensitivity to change and prediction of global change for the Alzheimer’s Questionnaire

    Michael Malek-Ahmadi;Kewei Chen;Kathryn Davis;Christine M Belden

  • What life course theoretical models best explain the relationship between exposure to childhood adversity and psychopathology symptoms: Recency, accumulation, or sensitive periods?

    Erin C. Dunn;Thomas W. Soare;Miriam R. Raffeld;Daniel S. Busso

  • Ictal neocortical slowing in temporal lobe epilepsy.

    H. Blumenfeld;M. Rivera;K. A. McNally;K. Davis

  • Theta and High-Frequency Activity Mark Spontaneous Recall of Episodic Memories

    John F. Burke;Ashwini D. Sharan;Michael R. Sperling;Ashwin G. Ramayya

  • MXene-infused bioelectronic interfaces for multiscale electrophysiology and stimulation.

    Nicolette Driscoll;Nicolette Driscoll;Brian Erickson;Brendan B. Murphy;Brendan B. Murphy;Andrew G. Richardson

  • Interictal epileptiform activity outside the seizure onset zone impacts cognition

    Hoameng Ung;Christian Cazares;Ameya Nanivadekar;Lohith Kini

  • White Matter Network Architecture Guides Direct Electrical Stimulation Through Optimal State Transitions

    Jennifer Stiso;Ankit N. Khambhati;Tommaso Menara;Ari E. Kahn

  • Continuous EEG is associated with favorable hospitalization outcomes for critically ill patients.

    Chloe E. Hill;Leah J. Blank;Dylan Thibault;Kathryn A. Davis

  • Alzheimer-like amyloid and tau alterations associated with cognitive deficit in temporal lobe epilepsy

    Sarah Gourmaud;Haochang Shou;David J Irwin;Kimberly Sansalone

  • Electrical Stimulation Modulates High γ Activity and Human Memory Performance.

    Michal T. Kucewicz;Brent M. Berry;Vaclav Kremen;Vaclav Kremen;Laura R. Miller

  • Adversity exposure during sensitive periods predicts accelerated epigenetic aging in children

    Sandro Marini;Kathryn A. Davis;Thomas W. Soare;Yiwen Zhu

  • A novel implanted device to wirelessly record and analyze continuous intracranial canine EEG.

    Kathryn A. Davis;Beverly K. Sturges;Charles H. Vite;Vanessa Ruedebusch

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian Litt
Brian Litt University of Pennsylvania
Joel M. Stein
Joel M. Stein University of Pennsylvania
Timothy H. Lucas
Timothy H. Lucas University of Pennsylvania
Danielle S. Bassett
Danielle S. Bassett University of Pennsylvania
Michael R. Sperling
Michael R. Sperling Thomas Jefferson University
Barbara C. Jobst
Barbara C. Jobst Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center
Sameer A. Sheth
Sameer A. Sheth Baylor College of Medicine
Michael J. Kahana
Michael J. Kahana University of Pennsylvania
Ashwini Sharan
Ashwini Sharan Thomas Jefferson University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kathryn A. Davis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles