World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shane N Sweet

Shane N Sweet

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10619 9940 733 689 159 3993

Shane N Sweet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shane N Sweet between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shane N Sweet published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2021. 30 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2021. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 13 publications
2004 2025

227 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shane N Sweet: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 2
2008 0
2009 1
2010 4
2011 5
2012 7
2013 6
2014 13
2015 12
2016 10
2017 21
2018 19
2019 26
2020 12
2021 33
2022 12
2023 13
2024 17
2025 13
Total 227
Download as CSV

Shane N Sweet publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shane N Sweet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 159 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 159
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Shane N Sweet D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shane N Sweet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Shane N Sweet is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and has a research focus primarily situated in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including General Health Professions, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their publication record reflects contributions to topics related to Spinal Cord Injury Research, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders, Health Policy Implementation Science, Traumatic Brain Injury Research, Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation, and Physical Activity and Health.

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include Disability and Rehabilitation, Disabilities, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spinal Cord, and JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies.

Collaborative work has involved multiple coauthors with whom they have published extensively:

  • Heather L. Gainforth
  • Zhiyang Shi
  • Krista L. Best
  • Christopher B. McBride
  • Jennifer R. Tomasone

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Shane N Sweet demonstrate a focus on community support, rehabilitation technology, and knowledge translation in health research:

  • "Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership" (2020) published in Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • "Web-Based Peer Support Interventions for Adults Living With Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review" (2021) published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
  • "A Personalized Home-Based Rehabilitation Program Using Exergames Combined With a Telerehabilitation App in a Chronic Stroke Survivor: Mixed Methods Case Study" (2021) published in JMIR Serious Games
  • "Outcomes of peer mentorship for people living with spinal cord injury: perspectives from members of Canadian community-based SCI organizations" (2021) published in Spinal Cord
  • "Optimization of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation by Combining Telerehabilitation With an Exergame in People With Chronic Stroke: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study" (2020) published in JMIR Research Protocols

Best Publications

  • A self-determination process model of physical activity adoption in the context of a randomized controlled trial.

    Michelle S. Fortier;Shane N. Sweet;Tracey L. O’Sullivan;Geoffrey C. Williams

  • Testing and integrating self-determination theory and self-efficacy theory in a physical activity context

    Shane N. Sweet;Michelle S. Fortier;Shaelyn M. Strachan;Chris M. Blanchard

  • Improving Physical Activity and Dietary Behaviours with Single or Multiple Health Behaviour Interventions? A Synthesis of Meta-Analyses and Reviews

    Shane N. Sweet;Michelle S. Fortier

  • Integrated Knowledge Translation Guiding Principles for Conducting and Disseminating Spinal Cord Injury Research in Partnership.

    Heather L. Gainforth;Heather L. Gainforth;Femke Hoekstra;Femke Hoekstra;Rhyann McKay;Rhyann McKay;Christopher B. McBride

  • Integrating insights from the parasport community to understand optimal Experiences: The Quality Parasport Participation Framework

    M. Blair Evans;Celina H. Shirazipour;Veronica Allan;Mona Zanhour

  • Explaining physical activity levels from a self-efficacy perspective: the physical activity counseling trial.

    Chris M. Blanchard;Michelle Fortier;Shane Sweet;Tracey O’Sullivan

  • A Path‐Analytic Model of Self‐Determination Theory in a Physical Activity Context

    Ashlee Barbeau;Shane N. Sweet;Michelle Fortier

  • Operationalizing the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of multi-sector partnerships

    Shane N Sweet;Shane N Sweet;Kathleen A Martin Ginis;Paul A Estabrooks;Amy E Latimer-Cheung

  • A Meta-Analysis of the Influence of Gender on Self-Determination Theory's Motivational Regulations for Physical Activity

    Eva Guérin;Elena Bales;Shane Sweet;Michelle Fortier

  • An examination of concussion education programmes: a scoping review methodology.

    Jeffrey G Caron;Gordon A Bloom;William R Falcão;Shane N Sweet

  • Operationalizing the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to evaluate the collective impact of autonomous community programs that promote health and well-being.

    Robert B. Shaw;Shane N. Sweet;Christopher B. McBride;William K. Adair

  • Exercise Facilitators and Barriers from Adoption to Maintenance in the Diabetes Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Trial

    Heather Tulloch;Shane N Sweet;Michelle Fortier;Gary Capstick

  • Perceived variety, psychological needs satisfaction and exercise-related well-being.

    Benjamin D. Sylvester;Martyn Standage;A. Justine Dowd;Luc J. Martin

  • Understanding physical activity in adults with type 2 diabetes after completing an exercise intervention trial: A mediation model of self-efficacy and autonomous motivation

    Shane N. Sweet;Michelle S. Fortier;Eva Guérin;Heather Tulloch

  • A moderated mediation of motivation on physical activity in the context of the Physical Activity Counseling randomized control trial

    Michelle S. Fortier;Elizabeth Wiseman;Shane N. Sweet;Tracey L. O’Sullivan

  • Peer support need fulfillment among adults with spinal cord injury: relationships with participation, life satisfaction and individual characteristics

    Shane N Sweet;Luc Noreau;Jean Leblond;Kathleen A Martin Ginis

  • I act, therefore I am: Athletic identity and the health action process approach predict sport participation among individuals with acquired physical disabilities

    Marie-Josée Perrier;Shane N. Sweet;Shaelyn M. Strachan;Amy E. Latimer-Cheung

  • Investigating intermediary variables in the physical activity and quality of life relationship in persons with spinal cord injury.

    Shane N. Sweet;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis;Jennifer R. Tomasone

  • Using tele-health to enhance motivation, leisure time physical activity, and quality of life in adults with spinal cord injury: A self-determination theory-based pilot randomized control trial

    K. Chemtob;M. Rocchi;K. Arbour-Nicitopoulos;D. Kairy

  • Self-determination and Exercise Stages of Change: Results from the Diabetes Aerobic and Resistance Exercise Trial

    Michelle S. Fortier;Shane N. Sweet;Heather Tulloch;Chris M. Blanchard

Frequent Co-Authors

Amy E. Latimer-Cheung
Amy E. Latimer-Cheung Queen's University
Kathleen A. Martin Ginis
Kathleen A. Martin Ginis University of British Columbia
Michelle A. Fortier
Michelle A. Fortier University of California, Irvine
Chris M. Blanchard
Chris M. Blanchard Dalhousie University
Mark R. Beauchamp
Mark R. Beauchamp University of British Columbia
Martyn Standage
Martyn Standage University of Bath
Ryan E. Rhodes
Ryan E. Rhodes University of Victoria
Gary S. Goldfield
Gary S. Goldfield Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
François Michaud
François Michaud Université de Sherbrooke
Jean Bourbeau
Jean Bourbeau McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens many doors – not just in counseling but across a wide range of careers in mental health, education, research, and more. Many students now choose online psychology degrees for their flexibility and accessibility, allowing them to balance studies with personal and work commitments.

One popular pathway is becoming a licensed therapist, which requires a specific combination of education, supervised experience, and passing state exams. Requirements can vary significantly by location. For example, you can explore the Baltimore licensed therapist education requirements, learn about the process for becoming a licensed therapist in Boise, or read about the licensed therapist requirements in Boston. Prospective therapists in New York State should check the specific Buffalo licensed therapist requirements.

Online degree programs in psychology often include foundational coursework in behavioral science, research methods, and ethics—key areas needed for any career in psychology or counseling. As you plan your journey, be sure to investigate the licensure requirements in your state to ensure your education aligns with your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Shane N Sweet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles