World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
25277
World Ranking
17476
National Ranking
8749

Dennis Deapen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dennis Deapen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 239 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Dennis Deapen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dennis Deapen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dennis Deapen is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Surgery, and Cancer Research. The main topics addressed in their work include colorectal cancer screening and detection, BRCA gene mutations in cancer, cancer genomics and diagnostics, global cancer incidence and screening, Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies, gastric cancer management and outcomes, and DNA repair mechanisms.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "An Approach to the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Gastric Cancer in the United States" (2021) published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • "A Summary of the 2020 Gastric Cancer Summit at Stanford University" (2020) published in Gastroenterology
  • "Association of Germline Genetic Testing Results With Locoregional and Systemic Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer" (2020) published in JAMA Oncology
  • "Comparison of SEER Treatment Data With Medicare Claims" (2020) published in UNC Libraries
  • "Poor-Prognosis Metastatic Cancers in Adolescents and Young Adults: Incidence Patterns, Trends, and Disparities" (2021) published in JNCI Cancer Spectrum

Dennis Deapen frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Eunjung Lee
  • Lihua Liu
  • Amie E. Hwang
  • Ann S. Hamilton
  • Allison W. Kurian

Their publications often appear in specific venues such as:

  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology
  • JAMA Oncology
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Best Publications

  • Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries.

    Claudia Allemani;Tomohiro Matsuda;Veronica Di Carlo;Rhea Harewood

  • A revised estimate of twin concordance in systemic lupus erythematosus

    Dennis Deapen;Agustin Escalante;Lisa Weinrib;David Horwitz

  • Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Associated Risk Factors Among Asian Americans of Chinese, Filipino, Vietnamese, Korean, and Japanese Ethnicities

    Melissa McCracken;Miho Olsen;Moon S. Chen;Ahmedin Jemal

  • Prevalence and Predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in a Population-Based Study of Breast Cancer in White and Black American Women Ages 35 to 64 Years

    Kathleen E. Malone;Janet R. Daling;David R. Doody;Li Hsu

  • Tamoxifen Therapy for Breast Cancer and Endometrial Cancer Risk

    Leslie Bernstein;Dennis Deapen;James R. Cerhan;Stephen M. Schwartz

  • Comparison of SEER Treatment Data With Medicare Claims

    Anne Michelle Noone;Jennifer Leigh Lund;Angela Mariotto;Kathleen Cronin

  • Anaplastic large cell lymphoma occurring in women with breast implants: analysis of 173 cases.

    Garry S. Brody;Dennis Deapen;Clive R. Taylor;Lauren Pinter-Brown

  • Concordance for Hodgkin's disease in identical twins suggesting genetic susceptibility to the young-adult form of the disease

    Thomas M. Mack;Wendy Cozen;Darryl K. Shibata;Lawrence M. Weiss

  • Patient Involvement in Surgery Treatment Decisions for Breast Cancer

    Steven J. Katz;Paula M. Lantz;Nancy K. Janz;Angela Fagerlin

  • Positive and negative psychosocial impact of being diagnosed with cancer as an adolescent or young adult

    Keith M. Bellizzi;Ashley Smith;Steven Schmidt;Theresa H. M. Keegan;Theresa H. M. Keegan

  • Rapidly rising breast cancer incidence rates among Asian-American women.

    Dennis Deapen;Lihua Liu;Carin Perkins;Leslie Bernstein

  • Cancer Incidence Trends Among Asian American Populations in the United States, 1990–2008

    Scarlett Lin Gomez;Anne-Michelle Noone;Daphne Y. Lichtensztajn;Steve Scoppa

  • The descriptive epidemiology of malignant cystosarcoma phyllodes tumors of the breast.

    Leslie Bernstein;Dennis Deapen;Ronald K. Ross

  • Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients.

    Allison W. Kurian;Kevin C. Ward;Nadia Howlader;Dennis Deapen

  • Active Smoking, Household Passive Smoking, and Breast Cancer: Evidence From the California Teachers Study

    Peggy Reynolds;Susan Hurley;Debbie E. Goldberg;Hoda Anton-Culver

  • The Influence of Race, Ethnicity, and Individual Socioeconomic Factors on Breast Cancer Stage at Diagnosis

    Paula M. Lantz;Mahasin Mujahid;Kendra Schwartz;Nancy K. Janz

  • High breast cancer incidence rates among California teachers: results from the California Teachers Study (United States).

    Leslie Bernstein;Mark Allen;Hoda Anton-Culver;Dennis Deapen

  • A case-control study of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

    Dennis M. Deapen;Brian E. Henderson

  • Recent diet and breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study (USA)

    Pamela L Horn-Ross;K J Hoggatt;Dee W West;Melissa R Krone

  • General Quality of Life 2 Years Following Treatment for Prostate Cancer: What Influences Outcomes? Results From the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study

    David F. Penson;Ziding Feng;Alan Kuniyuki;Dale McClerran

Frequent Co-Authors

Giske Ursin
Giske Ursin University of Oslo
Leslie Bernstein
Leslie Bernstein University of Southern California
Ann S. Hamilton
Ann S. Hamilton University of Southern California
Pamela L. Horn-Ross
Pamela L. Horn-Ross Cancer Prevention Institute of California
Brian L. Strom
Brian L. Strom Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Steven J. Katz
Steven J. Katz University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Hoda Anton-Culver
Hoda Anton-Culver University of California, Irvine
Christina A. Clarke
Christina A. Clarke Grail (United States)
Dee W. West
Dee W. West Stanford University
Michael F. Press
Michael F. Press University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine can open doors to a variety of rewarding professions beyond the traditional path of becoming a physician. Many students are now considering flexible online programs to fast-track their education while managing other commitments.

If you’re interested in healthcare leadership, the cheapest online mha programs can be a cost-effective route to becoming a healthcare administrator or manager. For nurses aiming to reach the highest clinical practice level, several institutions offer most affordable dnp programs online.

Pharmacy remains a popular and vital profession within healthcare. Accredited online pharmacy school programs allow you to earn your degree with increased flexibility and reduced costs.

For those drawn to the technological side of healthcare, health information technology programs online prepare graduates for growing demand in digital health management and informatics roles.

These online degrees offer adaptable pathways for advancing or changing your career in today’s dynamic healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Dennis Deapen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles