World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Amy E. Latimer-Cheung

Amy E. Latimer-Cheung

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7710 7194 518 488 258 13405

Amy E. Latimer-Cheung publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amy E. Latimer-Cheung between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amy E. Latimer-Cheung published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 19.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2018. 22 of the 307 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2018. 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 17 publications
2010 2025

307 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amy E. Latimer-Cheung: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 6
2011 5
2012 20
2013 27
2014 26
2015 22
2016 20
2017 31
2018 32
2019 24
2020 20
2021 22
2022 16
2023 14
2024 5
2025 17
Total 307
Download as CSV

Amy E. Latimer-Cheung publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy E. Latimer-Cheung sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 258 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 258
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Amy E. Latimer-Cheung D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy E. Latimer-Cheung sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Amy E. Latimer-Cheung is affiliated with Queen's University in Canada. Their research spans medicine, social sciences, and psychology, with significant contributions to subfields including sociology and political science, public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, physiology, and applied psychology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Sports injuries and prevention

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Amy E. Latimer-Cheung include:

  • Jennifer R. Tomasone
  • Guy Faulkner
  • Kelly P. Arbour-Nicitopoulos
  • Kathleen A. Martin Ginis
  • Celina H. Shirazipour

Their research has been published in various venues, notably Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism, Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health, and Disability and Health Journal.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Amy E. Latimer-Cheung include:

  • Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults aged 18-64 years and Adults aged 65 years or older: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep (2020), Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
  • Examining the relationship between parent physical activity support behaviour and physical activity among children and youth with autism spectrum disorder (2020), Autism
  • Knowledge translation of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults aged 18-64 years and Adults aged 65 years or older: a collaborative movement guideline knowledge translation process (2020), Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism
  • A Scoping Review of Evidence-Informed Recommendations for Designing Inclusive Playgrounds (2021), Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
  • Optimal messaging of the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults aged 18-64 years and Adults aged 65 years and older (2020), Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism

Best Publications

  • Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN) - terminology consensus project process and outcome

    Mark S. Tremblay;Salomé Aubert;Joel D. Barnes;Travis J. Saunders

  • Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth: An Integration of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep.

    Mark S. Tremblay;Mark S. Tremblay;Valerie Carson;Jean-Philippe Chaput;Jean-Philippe Chaput;Sarah Connor Gorber

  • Effects of Exercise Training on Fitness, Mobility, Fatigue, and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Adults With Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review to Inform Guideline Development

    Amy E. Latimer-Cheung;Lara A. Pilutti;Lara A. Pilutti;Audrey L. Hicks;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis

  • A systematic review of review articles addressing factors related to physical activity participation among children and adults with physical disabilities

    Kathleen A Martin Ginis;Jasmin K Ma;Amy E Latimer-Cheung;James H Rimmer

  • Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury: An update and a new guideline

    Kathleen A Martin Ginis;Jan W van der Scheer;Amy E Latimer-Cheung;Andy Barrow

  • Development of Evidence-Informed Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults With Multiple Sclerosis

    Amy E. Latimer-Cheung;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis;Audrey L. Hicks;Robert W. Motl

  • Canadian Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for the Early Years (aged 0–4 years)

    Mark S Tremblay;Allana G Leblanc;Valerie Carson;Louise Choquette

  • Narrative as a knowledge translation tool for facilitating impact: translating physical activity knowledge to disabled people and health professionals

    Brett Smith;Jennifer R Tomasone;Amy E Latimer-Cheung;Kathleen A Martin Ginis

  • Integrating insights from the parasport community to understand optimal Experiences: The Quality Parasport Participation Framework

    M. Blair Evans;Celina H. Shirazipour;Veronica Allan;Mona Zanhour

  • Operationalizing the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of multi-sector partnerships

    Shane N Sweet;Shane N Sweet;Kathleen A Martin Ginis;Paul A Estabrooks;Amy E Latimer-Cheung

  • Understanding parental support of child physical activity behavior.

    Ryan E. Rhodes;Tanya Berry;Cora L. Craig;Guy Faulkner

  • Developing physical activity interventions for adults with spinal cord injury. Part 2: motivational counseling and peer-mediated interventions for people intending to be active.

    Amy E. Latimer-Cheung;Kelly P. Arbour-Nicitopoulos;Lawrence R. Brawley;Casey Gray

  • Understanding action control of parental support behavior for child physical activity.

    Ryan E. Rhodes;John C. Spence;Tanya Berry;Sameer Deshpande

  • “Quitting Smoking Will Benefit Your Health”: The Evolution of Clinician Messaging to Encourage Tobacco Cessation

    Benjamin A. Toll;Alana M. Rojewski;Lindsay R. Duncan;Amy E. Latimer-Cheung

  • Narratives of participation among individuals with physical disabilities: A life-course analysis of athletes' experiences and development in parasport

    Veronica Allan;Brett Smith;Jean Côté;Kathleen A. Martin Ginis

  • Prediction of Depot-Based Specialty Recycling Behavior Using an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior:

    Ryan E. Rhodes;Mark R. Beauchamp;Mark Conner;Gert-Jan de Bruijn

  • Parental support of the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: prevalence and correlates

    Ryan E. Rhodes;John C. Spence;Tanya Berry;Guy Faulkner

  • I act, therefore I am: Athletic identity and the health action process approach predict sport participation among individuals with acquired physical disabilities

    Marie-Josée Perrier;Shane N. Sweet;Shaelyn M. Strachan;Amy E. Latimer-Cheung

  • Program conditions that foster quality physical activity participation experiences for people with a physical disability: a systematic review.

    Celina H. Shirazipour;M. Blair Evans;Jennifer Leo;Alexander Lithopoulos

  • Efficacy of Online Multi-Player Versus Single-Player Exergames on Adherence Behaviors Among Children: A Nonrandomized Control Trial.

    Maximus D Kaos;Mark R Beauchamp;Shelly Bursick;Amy E Latimer-Cheung

  • Correction: Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury: an update and a new guideline

    Kathleen A Martin Ginis;Jan W van der Scheer;Amy E Latimer-Cheung;Andy Barrow

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathleen A. Martin Ginis
Kathleen A. Martin Ginis University of British Columbia
Ryan E. Rhodes
Ryan E. Rhodes University of Victoria
Guy Faulkner
Guy Faulkner University of British Columbia
Mark S. Tremblay
Mark S. Tremblay Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Tanya R. Berry
Tanya R. Berry University of Alberta
John C. Spence
John C. Spence University of Alberta
Shane N Sweet
Shane N Sweet McGill University
Brett Smith
Brett Smith Durham University
Mark R. Beauchamp
Mark R. Beauchamp University of British Columbia
Ian Janssen
Ian Janssen Queen's University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding career paths, including in-demand roles such as substance abuse counseling. This field is growing and offers the opportunity to make a real difference in people’s lives. If you are interested in this direction, it's important to understand the educational and certification requirements, which can vary significantly depending on your location.

For example, you can explore the substance abuse counselor requirements in San Jose to see what is needed to qualify in that area. Similarly, if you are considering California, review the Santa Ana substance abuse counselors education requirements. Moving to Arizona? Learn about the Scottsdale substance abuse counselor certification requirements. If the Pacific Northwest is your destination, check the Seattle substance abuse counselors education requirements.

Online degrees can provide flexible pathways to meet these regional requirements. Make sure to research each state’s specific guidelines to plan your educational and career journey in psychology effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Amy E. Latimer-Cheung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles