World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tanya R. Berry

Tanya R. Berry

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10966 10263 761 714 200 3842

Tanya R. Berry publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tanya R. Berry between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tanya R. Berry published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2016. 3 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2016. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1994 2025

227 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tanya R. Berry: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 3
2005 4
2006 4
2007 5
2008 5
2009 8
2010 11
2011 14
2012 13
2013 12
2014 15
2015 14
2016 26
2017 10
2018 25
2019 18
2020 11
2021 12
2022 7
2023 3
2024 2
2025 1
Total 227
Download as CSV

Tanya R. Berry publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tanya R. Berry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 200 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 200
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tanya R. Berry D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tanya R. Berry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tanya R. Berry is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a total of 26 publications in the field. Within psychology, they have contributed to subfields such as applied psychology, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, public health, environmental and occupational health, as well as electronic, optical, and magnetic materials.

The main topics addressed in their work include behavioral health and interventions, eating disorders and behaviors, social and intergroup psychology, obesity, physical activity, diet, obesity and health practices, physical activity and health, and rare-earth and actinide compounds.

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include arXiv (Cornell University) with 8 publications, Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health and the Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology each with 2 publications, Psychology of Sport and Exercise with 2, and Research Square with 2 publications.

Tanya R. Berry has collaborated often with several co-authors, notably Tyrel M. McQueen (7 joint publications), Elaine Ori (5), Maxine Myre (4), Parvaneh Taymoori (3), and Kohestan Shirzadi (3).

Selected recent papers include:

  • Exploring the impact of physical activity-related weight stigma among women with self-identified obesity (2020) published in Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health
  • Physically active individuals look for more: An eye-tracking study of attentional bias (2020) published in Psychophysiology
  • Examining the Relationship Between Exercise-Related Cognitive Errors, Exercise Schema, and Implicit Associations (2021) published in Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
  • Physical activity information seeking among emerging adults attending university (2020) published in Journal of American College Health
  • The Relationship of Self-efficacy and Explicit and Implicit Associations on the Intention-Behavior Gap (2020) published in Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Best Publications

  • Risk Factors for Disordered Eating in Female University Athletes

    Tanya R. Berry;Bruce L. Howe

  • SARS Wars: An Examination of the Quantity and Construction of Health Information in the News Media

    Tanya R. Berry;Joan Wharf-Higgins;P.J. Naylor

  • Automatic Affective Evaluations of Physical Activity

    David E. Conroy;Tanya R. Berry

  • Application of a social cognitive model in explaining physical activity in Iranian female adolescents

    P. Taymoori;R. E. Rhodes;T. R. Berry

  • A school-based randomized controlled trial to improve physical activity among Iranian high school girls.

    Parvaneh Taymoori;Shamsaddin Niknami;Tanya Berry;David Lubans

  • Stages of change in adolescents: an examination of self-efficacy, decisional balance, and reasons for relapse.

    Tanya Berry;P.J. Naylor;Joan Wharf-Higgins

  • Changes in BMI over 6 years: the role of demographic and neighborhood characteristics

    T. R. Berry;J. C. Spence;C. Blanchard;N. Cutumisu

  • The validity and reliability of Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for breast cancer screening behaviors among Iranian women

    Parvaneh Taymoori;Tanya Berry

  • From paper to practice: barriers to adopting nutrition guidelines in schools.

    Shauna M. Downs;Anna Farmer;Maira Quintanilha;Tanya R. Berry

  • Understanding parental support of child physical activity behavior.

    Ryan E. Rhodes;Tanya Berry;Cora L. Craig;Guy Faulkner

  • Understanding action control of parental support behavior for child physical activity.

    Ryan E. Rhodes;John C. Spence;Tanya Berry;Sameer Deshpande

  • A longitudinal and cross-sectional examination of the relationship between reasons for choosing a neighbourhood, physical activity and body mass index

    Tanya R Berry;John C Spence;Chris M Blanchard;Nicoleta Cutumisu

  • Who’s Even Interested in the Exercise Message? Attentional Bias for Exercise and Sedentary Lifestyle Related Words

    Tanya R. Berry

  • Parental support of the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: prevalence and correlates

    Ryan E. Rhodes;John C. Spence;Tanya Berry;Guy Faulkner

  • A mixed methods evaluation of televised health promotion advertisements targeted at older adults.

    Tanya R. Berry;John C. Spence;Ronald C. Plotnikoff;Adrian Bauman

  • Effects of Health-Based and Appearance-Based Exercise Advertising on Exercise Attitudes, Social Physique Anxiety and Self-Presentation in an Exercise Setting

    Tanya R. Berry;Bruce L. Howe

  • Application of the Multi-Process Action Control Framework to Understand Parental Support of Child and Youth Physical Activity, Sleep, and Screen Time Behaviours

    Ryan E. Rhodes;Tanya Berry;Guy Faulkner;Amy E. Latimer‐Cheung

  • Knowledge and awareness of Canadian Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines: a synthesis of existing evidence.

    Allana G. LeBlanc;Tanya Berry;Sameer Deshpande;Mary Duggan

  • The importance of exercise self-efficacy for clinical outcomes in pulmonary rehabilitation.

    Anne-Marie Selzler;Wendy M. Rodgers;Tanya R. Berry;Michael K. Stickland

  • The health buck stops where? Thematic framing of health discourse to understand the context for CVD prevention.

    Joan Wharf Higgins;P. J. Naylor;Tanya Berry;Brian O'Connor

  • A qualitative examination of the perceptions of parents on the Canadian Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for the early years

    Valerie Carson;Marianne Clark;Tanya Berry;Nicholas L Holt

  • Canadian physical activity guidelines for adults: are Canadians aware?

    Leila Pfaeffli Dale;Allana G. LeBlanc;Krystn Orr;Tanya Berry

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Spence
John C. Spence University of Alberta
Ryan E. Rhodes
Ryan E. Rhodes University of Victoria
Guy Faulkner
Guy Faulkner University of British Columbia
Wendy M. Rodgers
Wendy M. Rodgers University of Alberta
Amy E. Latimer-Cheung
Amy E. Latimer-Cheung Queen's University
Mark S. Tremblay
Mark S. Tremblay Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Craig R. Hall
Craig R. Hall University of Western Ontario
Kerry R. McGannon
Kerry R. McGannon Laurentian University
Ronald C. Plotnikoff
Ronald C. Plotnikoff University of Newcastle Australia
Patti-Jean Naylor
Patti-Jean Naylor University of Victoria

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology or counseling can open doors to dynamic career opportunities. Many aspiring professionals pursue flexible online master’s programs as a foundation to become a licensed therapist. Each state and city has specific requirements, including coursework, supervised experience, and examinations.

For instance, you can review the Scottsdale licensed therapist education requirements to understand the needed academic track and clinical work. Similarly, if you’re considering the Pacific Northwest, it’s valuable to read about how to become a licensed therapist in Seattle and view the unique licensure process there.

Other regions, such as Spokane, have their own Spokane licensed therapist education requirements, while those aiming to build their careers in the Midwest should review the St. Louis licensed therapist requirements.

Researching these pathways not only helps you choose the right online degree but also ensures you meet clinical and licensing standards for your desired location.

Best Scientists Citing Tanya R. Berry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles