World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
100
Citations
40384
World Ranking
1498
National Ranking
847

John W. Eaton publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Eaton sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 364 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

John W. Eaton D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Eaton sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

John W. Eaton is affiliated with the University of Louisville in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions also in Medicine.

Their work focuses on several subfields, including Molecular Biology, Immunology, Oncology, Cancer Research, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. The main research topics covered in their publications include immune cells in cancer, extracellular vesicles in disease, microRNA in disease regulation, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, RNA interference and gene delivery, adenosine and purinergic signaling, and immunotherapy and immune responses.

John W. Eaton has authored multiple papers, including:

  • Cancer Vaccines: Promising Therapeutics or an Unattainable Dream, 2021, Vaccines
  • Monocytic MDSCs exhibit superior immune suppression via adenosine and depletion of adenosine improves efficacy of immunotherapy, 2023, Science Advances
  • Outbreak of Locally Acquired Mosquito-Transmitted (Autochthonous) Malaria - Florida and Texas, May-July 2023, 2023, MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • Exosome-based cancer vaccine for prevention of lung cancer, 2023, Stem Cell Investigation
  • Regulatory Role of Immune Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer: The Message Is in the Envelope, 2020, Frontiers in Immunology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Kavitha Yaddanapudi
  • Chi Li
  • Howard Donninger
  • Aaron G. Whitt
  • Omar Sadi Sarkar

John W. Eaton has published in various scientific venues, with multiple papers appearing in Scientific Reports, Journal of Visualized Experiments, and The Journal of Immunology. Other publication venues include Vaccines and Science Advances.

Best Publications

  • Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin

    Lyudmila V. Borovikova;Svetlana Ivanova;Minghuang Zhang;Huan Yang

  • Ferritin: a cytoprotective antioxidant strategem of endothelium.

    György Balla;Harry S. Jacob;József Balla;M. Rosenberg

  • Hemoglobin. A biologic fenton reagent.

    S M Sadrzadeh;E Graf;S S Panter;P E Hallaway

  • Antioxidant functions of phytic acid

    Ernst Graf;John W. Eaton

  • Nanomaterial cytotoxicity is composition, size, and cell type dependent

    Syed K Sohaebuddin;Paul T Thevenot;David Baker;John W Eaton

  • Pro-oxidant and cytotoxic effects of circulating heme

    Viktória Jeney;József Balla;Akihiro Yachie;Zsuzsa Varga

  • Endothelial-cell heme uptake from heme proteins: induction of sensitization and desensitization to oxidant damage.

    Jozsef Balla;Harry S. Jacob;Gyorgy Balla;Karl Nath

  • Inflammatory Responses to Biomaterials

    Liping Tang;John W. Eaton

  • Erythrocyte adherence to endothelium in sickle-cell anemia. A possible determinant of disease severity.

    Robert P. Hebbel;Marc A. B. Boogaerts;John W. Eaton;Martin H. Steinberg

  • Phytic acid. A natural antioxidant.

    E Graf;K L Empson;J W Eaton

  • Fibrin(ogen) mediates acute inflammatory responses to biomaterials.

    Liping Tang;John W. Eaton

  • Phagocyte Impotence Caused by an Invasive Bacterial Adenylate Cyclase

    Dennis L. Confer;John W. Eaton

  • Abnormal Adherence of Sickle Erythrocytes to Cultured Vascular Endothelium: POSSIBLE MECHANISM FOR MICROVASCULAR OCCLUSION IN SICKLE CELL DISEASE

    Robert P. Hebbel;Osamu Yamada;Charles F. Moldow;Harry S. Jacob

  • Hemin: a possible physiological mediator of low density lipoprotein oxidation and endothelial injury.

    G. Balla;Harry S Jacob;J. W. Eaton;John D Belcher

  • Spontaneous oxygen radical generation by sickle erythrocytes.

    Robert P. Hebbel;John W. Eaton;M. Balasingam;Martin H. Steinberg

  • Molecular bases of cellular iron toxicity.

    John W Eaton;Mingwei Qian

  • Molecular basis of biomaterial-mediated foreign body reactions

    Wen-Jing Hu;John W. Eaton;Tatiana P. Ugarova;Liping Tang

  • Small-molecule inhibition of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase activity suppresses glycolytic flux and tumor growth

    Brian Clem;Sucheta Telang;Amy Clem;Abdullah Yalcin

  • Elevated erythrocyte calcium in sickle cell disease.

    John W. Eaton;Harry S. Jacob;T. D. Skelton;Harold S. Swofford

  • Accelerated autoxidation and heme loss due to instability of sickle hemoglobin.

    Robert P. Hebbel;William T. Morgan;John W. Eaton;Bo E. Hedlund

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert P. Hebbel
Robert P. Hebbel University of Minnesota
Harry S. Jacob
Harry S. Jacob University of Minnesota
Gregory M. Vercellotti
Gregory M. Vercellotti University of Minnesota
George J. Brewer
George J. Brewer University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Liping Tang
Liping Tang The University of Texas at Arlington
James G. White
James G. White University of Minnesota
Ulf T. Brunk
Ulf T. Brunk Linköping University
Jason Chesney
Jason Chesney University of Louisville
Steven R. Meshnick
Steven R. Meshnick University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Martin H. Steinberg
Martin H. Steinberg Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to many healthcare and science-related professions. Whether you're just starting out or looking to advance your current career, there are flexible online degrees and certifications designed to fit different goals and budgets.

For students interested in imaging technologies or radiologic sciences, consider enrolling in online rad tech programs. These programs offer a foundation in medical imaging and can lead to in-demand roles in hospitals and clinics.

Those drawn to nutrition and public health may benefit from dietitian masters programs, which prepare graduates to become registered dietitians or nutrition experts.

For individuals seeking an entry point into healthcare, medical assistant courses online provide a practical introduction to clinical and administrative skills, often with financial aid options available.

Finally, if you’re already a medical assistant aiming to advance, ma to lpn bridge programs online are designed to help you transition to a licensed practical nurse role, further expanding your career pathways in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing John W. Eaton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles