World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alessandro Fantechi

Alessandro Fantechi

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4388
World Ranking
12252
National Ranking
424

Alessandro Fantechi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alessandro Fantechi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 226 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alessandro Fantechi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alessandro Fantechi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alessandro Fantechi is affiliated with the University of Florence in Italy, focusing on areas within computer science and engineering. Their research contributions predominantly address formal methods, software engineering, and system reliability.

The scientist has produced work in multiple publication venues, including:

  • Formal Aspects of Computing
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Applied Sciences
  • Journal of Systems and Software
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Fantechi's main fields of study encompass computer science and engineering, with a particular emphasis on subfields such as computational theory and mathematics, software, information systems, artificial intelligence, and control and systems engineering.

The main research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Petri Nets in System Modeling
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies

Among recent papers involving Fantechi, the following stand out:

  • "VIBE: Looking for Variability In amBiguous rEquirements," 2022, Journal of Systems and Software

Other relevant recent publications coauthored by peers in related domains include:

  • "An Efficient Library for Reliability Block Diagram Evaluation," 2021, Applied Sciences
  • "Analysing an autonomous tramway positioning system with the Uppaal Statistical Model Checker," 2021, Formal Aspects of Computing
  • "Compositional Verification of Railway Interlocking Systems," 2022, Formal Aspects of Computing
  • "Does Every Computer Scientist Need to Know Formal Methods?" 2024, Formal Aspects of Computing

Fantechi frequently collaborates with several coauthors including Stefania Gnesi, Gloria Gori, Anne E. Haxthausen, Maurice H. ter Beek, and Laura Semini. Collaboration patterns indicate ongoing engagements in topics related to formal verification and software reliability within international research contexts.

Best Publications

  • Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation

    Martin Wirsing;Matthias Hölzl;Lucia Acciai;Federico Banti

  • Application of linguistic techniques for Use Case analysis

    A. Fantechi;S. Gnesi;G. Lami;A. Maccari

  • GUARDS: a generic upgradable architecture for real-time dependable systems

    D. Powell;J. Arlat;L. Beus-Dukic;A. Bondavalli

  • An action-based framework for verifying logical and behavioural properties of concurrent systems

    R. De Nicola;A. Fantechi;S. Gnesi;G. Ristori

  • Assisting requirement formalization by means of natural language translation

    A. Fantechi;S. Gnesi;G. Ristori;M. Carenini

  • Natural language processing of patents and technical documentation

    Gaetano Cascini;Alessandro Fantechi;Emilio Spinicci

  • Formal Description of Variability in Product Families

    Patrizia Asirelli;Maurice H. ter Beek;Stefania Gnesi;Alessandro Fantechi

  • Formal Modeling for Product Families Engineering

    A. Fantechi;S. Gnesi

  • Model Checking Interlocking Control Tables

    Alessio Ferrari;Alessio Ferrari;Gianluca Magnani;Daniele Grasso;Alessandro Fantechi

  • A state/event-based model-checking approach for the analysis of abstract system properties

    Maurice H. ter Beek;Alessandro Fantechi;Stefania Gnesi;Franco Mazzanti

  • A Formal Verification Environment for Railway Signaling System Design

    Cinzia Bernardeschi;Alessandro Fantechi;Stefania Gnesi;Salvatore Larosa

  • Testing equivalences for event structures

    Luca Aceto;Rocco De Nicola;Alessandro Fantechi

  • Detecting requirements defects with NLP patterns: an industrial experience in the railway domain

    Alessio Ferrari;Gloria Gori;Benedetta Rosadini;Iacopo Trotta

  • Modelling and analysing variability in product families: Model checking of modal transition systems with variability constraints

    Maurice H. ter Beek;Alessandro Fantechi;Alessandro Fantechi;Stefania Gnesi;Franco Mazzanti

  • Using NLP to Detect Requirements Defects: An Industrial Experience in the Railway Domain

    Benedetta Rosadini;Alessio Ferrari;Gloria Gori;Alessandro Fantechi

  • Some Trends in Formal Methods Applications to Railway Signaling

    Alessandro Fantechi;Wan Fokkink;Angelo Morzenti

  • A logical framework to deal with variability

    Patrizia Asirelli;Maurice H. Ter Beek;Alessandro Fantechi;Stefania Gnesi

  • Model checking fault tolerant systems

    Cinzia Bernardeschi;Alessandro Fantechi;Stefania Gnesi

  • Twenty-Five Years of Formal Methods and Railways: What Next?

    Alessandro Fantechi

  • Using Temporal Logic and Model Checking in Automated Recognition of Human Activities for Ambient-Assisted Living

    Tommaso Magherini;Alessandro Fantechi;Chris D. Nugent;Enrico Vicario

  • An action/state-based model-checking approach for the analysis of communication protocols for service-oriented applications

    Maurice H. Ter Beek;A. Fantechi;S. Gnesi;F. Mazzanti

  • Tableau methods to describe strong bisimilarity on LOTOS processes involving pure interleaving and enabling.

    Alessandro Fantechi;Stefania Gnesi;R. Sacchelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefania Gnesi
Stefania Gnesi Institute of Information Science and Technologies
Alessio Ferrari
Alessio Ferrari École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Andrea Bondavalli
Andrea Bondavalli University of Florence
Rosario Pugliese
Rosario Pugliese University of Florence
Rocco De Nicola
Rocco De Nicola IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca
Paola Inverardi
Paola Inverardi University of L'Aquila
Chris D. Nugent
Chris D. Nugent University of Ulster
Martin Wirsing
Martin Wirsing Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Dániel Varró
Dániel Varró Linköping University
Ugo Montanari
Ugo Montanari University of Pisa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open up flexible and affordable options for advancing your career in technology and STEM fields. Many students seek a college with low gpa admissions requirements, which can offer a second chance for those with less traditional academic backgrounds.

If you’re passionate about environmental issues, you may want to consider an environmental science or engineering degree. These fields offer a variety of high-paying jobs with environmental science degree pathways, ranging from research and consultancy to government and industry roles.

For computer science enthusiasts aiming to fast-track their education, an accelerated cs degree can help you complete your studies in less time without sacrificing rigorous coursework.

Those interested in sustainability and design may also find value in researching the environmental engineering degree for practical, impactful careers in engineering.

Whether your goal is to switch careers, advance in your current field, or pursue a passion, these related online degrees provide diverse entry points and opportunities for growth.

Best Scientists Citing Alessandro Fantechi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles