World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
11136
World Ranking
5580
National Ranking
125

Rocco De Nicola publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rocco De Nicola sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 265 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rocco De Nicola D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rocco De Nicola sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - European Association for Theoretical Computer Science (EATCS) Fellow For his seminal contributions to concurrency theory, and to languages and models for describing interaction and mobility in multi-agents systems
  • 2011 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Rocco De Nicola is primarily affiliated with the IMT Institute for Advanced Studies Lucca in Italy. Their research spans the broad field of computer science, with particular contributions to subfields such as artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, information systems, mechanical engineering, and sociology and political science.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Distributed systems and fault tolerance
  • Modular robots and swarm intelligence
  • Misinformation and its impacts
  • Advanced software engineering methodologies
  • Formal methods in verification
  • Advanced malware detection techniques
  • Spam and phishing detection

Rocco De Nicola has contributed multiple papers to various scholarly venues. Prominent publication sources with frequent contributions include:

  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • EPJ Data Science
  • Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
  • Science of Computer Programming
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Selected recent publications authored or co-authored by Rocco De Nicola include:

  • "Rigorous engineering of collective adaptive systems: special section," 2020, published in International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • "Distributed service-level agreement management with smart contracts and blockchain," 2020, published in Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience
  • "Framework, Tools and Good Practices for Cybersecurity Curricula," 2021, published in IEEE Access
  • "6G Networks Physical Layer Security Using RGB Visible Light Communications," 2021, published in IEEE Access
  • "Deepfake Media Forensics: Status and Future Challenges," 2025, published in Journal of Imaging

Frequent collaborators in their research include Marinella Petrocchi, Manuel Pratelli, Omar Inverso, Fabio Saracco, and Luca Di Stefano.

In recognition of their work, Rocco De Nicola has received several honors, including being named a Fellow of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science (EATCS) in 2019. The fellowship citation highlights contributions to concurrency theory and to languages and models that describe interaction and mobility in multi-agent systems. Additionally, they have been a member of Academia Europaea since 2011.

Best Publications

  • Testing equivalences for processes

    R. De Nicola;M.C.B. Hennessy

  • Three logics for branching bisimulation

    Rocco De Nicola;Frits Vaandrager

  • Action versus State based Logics for Transition Systems

    Rocco De Nicola;Frits W. Vaandrager

  • Testing Equivalence for Processes

    Rocco De Nicola;Matthew Hennessy

  • SCC: a service centered calculus

    M. Boreale;R. Bruni;L. Caires;R. De Nicola

  • A distributed operational semantics for CCS based on condition/event systems

    P. Degano;Rocco De Nicola;U. Montanari

  • SENSORIA process calculi for service-oriented computing

    Martin Wirsing;Rocco De Nicola;Stephen Gilmore;Matthias Hölzl

  • The role of bot squads in the political propaganda on Twitter

    Guido Caldarelli;Rocco De Nicola;Fabio Del Vigna;Marinella Petrocchi

  • Proof Techniques for Cryptographic Processes

    Michele Boreale;Rocco De Nicola;Rosario Pugliese

  • A Formal Approach to Autonomic Systems Programming: The SCEL Language

    Rocco De Nicola;Michele Loreti;Rosario Pugliese;Francesco Tiezzi

  • Back and forth bisimulations

    Rocco De Nicola;Ugo Montanari;Frits W. Vaandrager

  • An action-based framework for verifying logical and behavioural properties of concurrent systems

    R. De Nicola;A. Fantechi;S. Gnesi;G. Ristori

  • Sessions and Pipelines for Structured Service Programming

    Michele Boreale;Roberto Bruni;Rocco Nicola;Michele Loreti

  • The Klaim project: Theory and practice

    Lorenzo Bettini;Viviana Bono;Rocco De Nicola;Gian Luigi Ferrari

  • Extensional equivalences for transition systems

    Unknown

  • Types for access control

    Rocco De Nicola;GianLuigi Ferrari;Rosario Pugliese;Betti Venneri

  • Partial orderings descriptions and observations of nondeterministic concurrent processes

    Pierpaolo Degano;Rocco De Nicola;Ugo Montanari

  • KLAVA: a Java package for distributed and mobile applications

    Lorenzo Bettini;Rocco De Nicola;Rosario Pugliese

  • A Symbolic Semantics for the π-Calculus

    Michele Boreale;Rocco De Nicola

  • A partial ordering semantics for CCS

    P. Degano;R. De Nicola;U. Montanari

  • A Language-Based Approach to Autonomic Computing

    Rocco De Nicola;Gian Luigi Ferrari;Michele Loreti;Rosario Pugliese

Frequent Co-Authors

Rosario Pugliese
Rosario Pugliese University of Florence
Ugo Montanari
Ugo Montanari University of Pisa
Martin Wirsing
Martin Wirsing Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Guido Caldarelli
Guido Caldarelli Ca Foscari University of Venice
Frits W. Vaandrager
Frits W. Vaandrager Radboud University
Jane Hillston
Jane Hillston University of Edinburgh
Stephen Gilmore
Stephen Gilmore University of Edinburgh
Franco Zambonelli
Franco Zambonelli University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Flemming Nielson
Flemming Nielson Technical University of Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can provide flexible and cost-effective ways to earn a degree, especially in Computer Science and related fields. Many students look for cheap online college classes to reduce overall tuition costs while still gaining access to high-quality courses.

For individuals concerned about their academic history, several top institutions are considered best colleges for low gpa applicants. These colleges offer a second chance to those who are dedicated to advancing their skills in computer science, opening doors to new opportunities in tech and beyond.

Graduates with degrees in technology or science can pursue a wide range of professions. For example, those interested in sustainability and technology might ask, what can you get with an environmental science degree? Both fields offer promising career pathways with plenty of room for specialization.

If you’re eager to fast-track your career, consider enrolling in an online computer science degree program that lets you complete your studies sooner. Online and accelerated programs are a practical option for working professionals and those seeking a flexible learning environment.

Best Scientists Citing Rocco De Nicola

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles