World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe

Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
9006
World Ranking
5705
National Ranking
3095

Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 213 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe is affiliated with Washington State University in the United States, focusing primarily on research in medicine and psychology. Their scholarly output reflects an emphasis on dementia and cognitive impairment research, cognitive functions and memory, as well as technology use by older adults.

The scientist's research areas are diverse, covering subfields such as psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, demography, general health professions, and cognitive neuroscience. Key topics in their work include context-aware activity recognition systems, digital mental health interventions, aging and gerontology research, and frailty in older adults.

Frequent publication venues for this researcher include:

  • Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • The Clinical Neuropsychologist
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Key recent publications by Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe include:

  • "Bridging the gap between performance-based assessment and self-reported everyday functioning: An ecological momentary assessment approach," 2020, The Clinical Neuropsychologist
  • "Fusing Ambient and Mobile Sensor Features Into a Behaviorome for Predicting Clinical Health Scores," 2021, IEEE Access
  • "Automated Smart Home Assessment to Support Pain Management: Multiple Methods Analysis," 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Insight into memory and functional abilities in individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment," 2020, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
  • "The night out task and scoring application: an ill-structured, open-ended clinic-based test representing cognitive capacities used in everyday situations," 2020, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Collaborations have been frequent with several researchers, including:

  • Diane J. Cook
  • Catherine Luna
  • Brooke F. Beech
  • Reanne Cunningham
  • Alyssa Weakley

In 2021, Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills.

    Naomi Chaytor;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe

  • Improving the ecological validity of executive functioning assessment

    Naomi Chaytor;Naomi Chaytor;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;Robert Burr

  • Characterizing multiple memory deficits and their relation to everyday functioning in individuals with mild cognitive impairment.

    Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;Ellen Woo;David R. Greeley

  • Applications of Technology in Neuropsychological Assessment

    Carolyn M. Parsey;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe

  • Automated Cognitive Health Assessment Using Smart Home Monitoring of Complex Tasks

    Prafulla N. Dawadi;Diane J. Cook;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe

  • Cognitive correlates of functional performance in older adults: comparison of self-report, direct observation, and performance-based measures.

    Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;Carolyn Parsey;Diane J. Cook

  • Memory remediation after severe closed head injury: notebook training versus supportive therapy.

    Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;John F. Fahy;James P. Whelan;Charles J. Long

  • Automated Cognitive Health Assessment From Smart Home-Based Behavior Data

    Prafulla Nath Dawadi;Diane Joyce Cook;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe

  • Naturalistic assessment of everyday functioning in individuals with mild cognitive impairment: the day-out task

    Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;Courtney McAlister;Alyssa Weakley

  • Smart Home-Based Prediction of Multidomain Symptoms Related to Alzheimer's Disease

    Ane Alberdi;Alyssa Weakley;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;Diane J. Cook

  • Analyzing Activity Behavior and Movement in a Naturalistic Environment Using Smart Home Techniques

    Diane J. Cook;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;Prafulla Dawadi

  • Automated assessment of cognitive health using smart home technologies

    Prafulla N. Dawadi;Diane J. Cook;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;Carolyn Parsey

  • Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Tests: Focus on the California Verbal Learning Test and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test

    Michelle Y. Kibby;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;Charles J. Long

  • Aging and word-finding: a comparison of spontaneous and constrained naming tests.

    M. Schmitter-Edgecombe;M. Vesneski;D. W. R. Jones

  • Multicomponent analysis of a digital Trail Making Test.

    Robert P Fellows;Jessamyn Dahmen;Diane Cook;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe

  • Examination of Variables That May Affect the Relationship Between Cognition and Functional Status in Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Meta-Analysis.

    Courtney Mcalister;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;Richard Lamb

  • Robot-Enabled Support of Daily Activities in Smart Home Environments.

    Garrett Wilson;Christopher Pereyda;Nisha Raghunath;Gabriel Victor de la Cruz

  • Self-awareness and traumatic brain injury outcome

    Kayela Robertson;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe

  • Application of Cognitive Rehabilitation Theory to the Development of Smart Prompting Technologies

    A. M. Seelye;M. Schmitter-Edgecombe;B. Das;D. J. Cook

  • Naturalistic assessment of everyday activities and prompting technologies in mild cognitive impairment.

    Adriana M. Seelye;Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;Diane J. Cook;Aaron Crandall

  • Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks following severe closed-head injury

    Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe;Michelle Langill

Frequent Co-Authors

Diane J. Cook
Diane J. Cook Washington State University
Lawrence B. Holder
Lawrence B. Holder Washington State University
Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias
Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias University of California, Davis
Danielle J Harvey
Danielle J Harvey University of California, Davis
Tania Giovannetti
Tania Giovannetti Temple University
J. Vincent Filoteo
J. Vincent Filoteo University of California, San Diego
Dan M Mungas
Dan M Mungas University of California, Davis
Paul E. Gilbert
Paul E. Gilbert San Diego State University
Steven Paul Woods
Steven Paul Woods University of Houston
Irene Litvan
Irene Litvan University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Psychology opens the door to an array of rewarding online career pathways in mental health and communication fields. Many students go on to fulfill specialized roles such as Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) or Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP), each with unique licensure and certification requirements.

If you're interested in counseling, you'll want to understand how to get an lpc license in Wyoming, including the necessary academic qualifications and supervised experience hours. Those drawn to speech-language pathology should be aware that requirements vary by state. For example, you can explore slp requirements in Alabama, slp requirements in Alaska, and Arizona slp certification requirements for a clearer picture of the steps needed in each region.

These roles typically require at least a master’s degree, completion of accredited graduate programs, clinical internships, and successful exam performance. Online programs can offer the flexibility you need while pursuing these pathways, allowing for balance between study, work, and other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles