World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias

Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
54
Citations
9574
World Ranking
4953
National Ranking
2221

Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 145 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with a focus on various subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Health, Health Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, and Geriatrics and Gerontology.

Their research topics cover a broad range of areas in cognitive and aging-related health, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Recent significant publications authored or co-authored by Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias include:

  • "Study design and methods: U.S. study to protect brain health through lifestyle intervention to reduce risk (U.S. POINTER)" (2023) published in Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Decline in cognitively complex everyday activities accelerates along the Alzheimer's disease continuum" (2020) published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • "The Measurement of Everyday Cognition (ECog)" (2021) published in Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
  • "Structured vs Self-Guided Multidomain Lifestyle Interventions for Global Cognitive Function" (2025) published in JAMA
  • "BHA-CS: A novel cognitive composite for Alzheimer's disease and related disorders" (2020) published in Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring

Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Rachel A. Whitmer
  • Kathryn V. Papp
  • Dan Mungas
  • Laura D. Baker
  • Heather M. Snyder

Their published work appears consistently in a number of academic journals known for research in aging, neurology, and related fields. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Best Publications

  • Progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia in clinic- vs community-based cohorts.

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Dan M Mungas;Bruce R Reed;Danielle J Harvey

  • The Measurement of Everyday Cognition (ECog): Scale Development and Psychometric Properties

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Dan M Mungas;Bruce R Reed;Deborah Cahn-Weiner

  • MCI is associated with deficits in everyday functioning.

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Dan M Mungas;Bruce R Reed;Danielle J Harvey

  • Longitudinal Changes in Memory and Executive Functioning are Associated with Longitudinal Change in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living in older adults

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Deborah Cahn-Weiner;Danielle J Harvey;Bruce R Reed

  • Degree of discrepancy between self and other-reported everyday functioning by cognitive status: dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy elders

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Dan M Mungas;William Jagust

  • Measuring cognitive reserve based on the decomposition of episodic memory variance

    Bruce R Reed;Dan M Mungas;Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Danielle J Harvey

  • Cognitive and neuroimaging predictors of instrumental activities of daily living

    Deborah Cahn-Weiner;Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Laura Julian;Danielle J Harvey

  • The relationship between neuropsychological performance and daily functioning in individuals with Alzheimer's disease: ecological validity of neuropsychological tests

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Ernest Harrell;Craig Neumann;Andrew Houtz

  • Vitamin D Status and Rates of Cognitive Decline in a Multiethnic Cohort of Older Adults

    Joshua W. Miller;Joshua W. Miller;Danielle J Harvey;Laurel A Beckett;Ralph Green

  • The measurement of everyday cognition: development and validation of a short form of the Everyday Cognition scales.

    Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Dan M Mungas;Danielle J Harvey;Amanda Simmons

  • Heterogeneity of cognitive trajectories in diverse older persons.

    Dan M Mungas;Laurel A Beckett;Danielle J Harvey;Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias

  • Life experience and demographic influences on cognitive function in older adults.

    Paul W H Brewster;Rebecca J. Melrose;María J. Marquine;Julene K. Johnson

  • MRI predictors of cognitive change in a diverse and carefully characterized elderly population.

    Owen Carmichael;Dan M Mungas;Laurel A Beckett;Danielle J Harvey

  • Cognitive Activities During Adulthood Are More Important than Education in Building Reserve

    Bruce R Reed;Maritza Dowling;Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Joshua Sonnen

  • Self-rated and informant-rated everyday function in comparison to objective markers of Alzheimer's disease

    Alicia D. Rueda;Karen M. Lau;Naomi Saito;Danielle Harvey

  • Education amplifies brain atrophy effect on cognitive decline: implications for cognitive reserve.

    Dan M Mungas;Brandon Gavett;Evan Fletcher;Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias

  • Brain volume change and cognitive trajectories in aging.

    Evan Fletcher;Brandon Gavett;Danielle J Harvey;Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias

  • Measuring cognition and function in the preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease

    Sandra Weintraub;Maria C. Carrillo;Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Terry E. Goldberg

  • Video-EEG telemetry can be a crucial tool for neurologists experienced in epilepsy when diagnosing seizure disorders.

    Taoufik M. Alsaadi;Catherine Thieman;Alan Shatzel;Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias

  • Demographic predictors of cognitive change in ethnically diverse older persons.

    Dawnté R. Early;Keith F. Widaman;Danielle J Harvey;Laurel A Beckett

  • Differences in brain volume, hippocampal volume, cerebrovascular risk factors, and apolipoprotein E4 among mild cognitive impairment subtypes.

    Jing He;Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;Oliver Martinez;Bruce R Reed

  • Dementia in fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS): Comparison with Alzheimer's disease†

    Andreea L. Seritan;Danh V. Nguyen;Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias;W Ladson Hinton

Frequent Co-Authors

Dan M Mungas
Dan M Mungas University of California, Davis
Bruce R Reed
Bruce R Reed University of California, Davis
Charles DeCarli
Charles DeCarli University of California, Davis
Danielle J Harvey
Danielle J Harvey University of California, Davis
John M Olichney
John M Olichney University of California, Davis
Laurel A. Beckett
Laurel A. Beckett University of California, Davis
William J. Jagust
William J. Jagust University of California, Berkeley
Owen Carmichael
Owen Carmichael Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Keith F. Widaman
Keith F. Widaman University of California, Riverside
Reisa A. Sperling
Reisa A. Sperling Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Sarah E Tomaszewski Farias

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles