World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4515 4178 2508 2269 208 16142

Rebecca Amariglio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rebecca Amariglio between 2011 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rebecca Amariglio published across 16 years, from 2011 to 2026, averaging 19.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2023. 39 of the 311 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2023. 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 39 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 38 publications 2026: 1 publication
2011 2026

311 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rebecca Amariglio: publications per year, 2011 to 2026
Year Publications
2011 2
2012 6
2013 13
2014 18
2015 28
2016 21
2017 20
2018 13
2019 23
2020 24
2021 27
2022 17
2023 39
2024 21
2025 38
2026 1
Total 311
Download as CSV

Rebecca Amariglio publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Amariglio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 208 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 208
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rebecca Amariglio D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca Amariglio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rebecca Amariglio is affiliated with Harvard Medical School in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in the fields of psychiatry and mental health, physiology, cognitive neuroscience, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, and clinical psychology.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics such as:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Amariglio has co-authored publications with several researchers frequently, including:

  • Reisa A. Sperling
  • Dorene M. Rentz
  • Kathryn V. Papp
  • Rachel F. Buckley
  • Gad A. Marshall

They have published notably in high-profile venues such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Neuropsychology
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Key recent papers include:

  • The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline, 2020, The Lancet Neurology
  • Sex Mediates Relationships Between Regional Tau Pathology and Cognitive Decline, 2020, Annals of Neurology
  • Stress, resilience, and coping strategies in a sample of community-dwelling older adults during COVID-19, 2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Unsupervised mobile cognitive testing for use in preclinical Alzheimer's disease, 2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • Identifying Sensitive Measures of Cognitive Decline at Different Clinical Stages of Alzheimer's Disease, 2020, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

The overall body of work spans a variety of clinical and cognitive aspects relating to aging, neurodegenerative diseases, and psychological resilience, with an emphasis on Alzheimer's disease and cognitive decline. Their publication record and collaboration network indicate active engagement in advancing research on neurological diseases and methods for early detection and assessment.

Best Publications

  • A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Frank Jessen;Frank Jessen;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Martin van Boxtel;Monique Breteler

  • The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline

    Frank Jessen;Frank Jessen;Rebecca E Amariglio;Rachel F Buckley;Rachel F Buckley;Wiesje M van der Flier

  • Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease

    Keith A. Johnson;Aaron Schultz;Rebecca A. Betensky;J. Alex Becker

  • Subjective Cognitive Decline in Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease

    Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Colette M. Smart;Rebecca E. Amariglio

  • Implementation of subjective cognitive decline criteria in research studies.

    José L. Molinuevo;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Rebecca Amariglio;Rachel Buckley;Rachel Buckley;Rachel Buckley

  • Subjective cognitive complaints and amyloid burden in cognitively normal older individuals

    Rebecca E. Amariglio;Rebecca E. Amariglio;J. Alex Becker;Jeremy Carmasin;Lauren P. Wadsworth

  • Subjective Cognitive Decline in Older Adults: An Overview of Self-Report Measures Used Across 19 International Research Studies

    Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Laura A. Rabin;Colette M. Smart;Paul K. Crane;Rebecca E. Amariglio

  • Synergistic Effect of β-Amyloid and Neurodegeneration on Cognitive Decline in Clinically Normal Individuals

    Elizabeth C. Mormino;Rebecca A. Betensky;Trey Hedden;Aaron P. Schultz

  • Sex Differences in the Association of Global Amyloid and Regional Tau Deposition Measured by Positron Emission Tomography in Clinically Normal Older Adults.

    Rachel F. Buckley;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Jennifer S. Rabin;Timothy J. Hohman

  • The impact of amyloid-beta and tau on prospective cognitive decline in older individuals

    Reisa A. Sperling;Reisa A. Sperling;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Aaron P. Schultz;Rebecca A. Betensky

  • Face-name associative memory performance is related to amyloid burden in normal elderly.

    Dorene M. Rentz;Dorene M. Rentz;Rebecca E. Amariglio;J. Alex Becker;Meghan Frey

  • Sex, amyloid, and APOE ε4 and risk of cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: Findings from three well-characterized cohorts.

    Rachel F. Buckley;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Michael J. Properzi

  • Amyloid-β deposition in mild cognitive impairment is associated with increased hippocampal activity, atrophy and clinical progression

    Willem Huijbers;Willem Huijbers;Elizabeth C. Mormino;Aaron P. Schultz;Sarah Wigman

  • Structural tract alterations predict downstream tau accumulation in amyloid-positive older individuals.

    Heidi I. L. Jacobs;Heidi I. L. Jacobs;Trey Hedden;Aaron P. Schultz;Jorge Sepulcre

  • Specific Subjective Memory Complaints in Older Persons May Indicate Poor Cognitive Function

    Rebecca England Amariglio;Mary K. Townsend;Francine Grodstein;Reisa A. Sperling

  • Association of Higher Cortical Amyloid Burden With Loneliness in Cognitively Normal Older Adults.

    Nancy J. Donovan;Olivia I. Okereke;Patrizia Vannini;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Rebecca E. Amariglio

  • Subjective Cognitive Concerns and Neuropsychiatric Predictors of Progression to the Early Clinical Stages of Alzheimer Disease

    Nancy J. Donovan;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Amy S. Zoller;Rebecca K. Rudel

  • Tracking Early Decline in Cognitive Function in Older Individuals at Risk for Alzheimer Disease Dementia The Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Cognitive Function Instrument

    Rebecca E. Amariglio;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Michael C. Donohue;Gad A. Marshall;Dorene M. Rentz

  • Harvard Aging Brain Study: Dataset and accessibility

    Alexander Dagley;Molly LaPoint;Willem Huijbers;Trey Hedden

  • Region-Specific Association of Subjective Cognitive Decline With Tauopathy Independent of Global β-Amyloid Burden.

    Rachel F Buckley;Bernard Hanseeuw;Bernard Hanseeuw;Aaron P Schultz;Patrizia Vannini

  • Cognitive Profile of Amyloid Burden and White Matter Hyperintensities in Cognitively Normal Older Adults

    T. Hedden;E. C. Mormino;R. E. Amariglio;A. P. Younger

  • Promising developments in neuropsychological approaches for the detection of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: a selective review

    Dorene M Rentz;Mario A Parra Rodriguez;Rebecca Amariglio;Yaakov Stern

Frequent Co-Authors

Reisa A. Sperling
Reisa A. Sperling Brigham and Women's Hospital
Dorene M. Rentz
Dorene M. Rentz Harvard Medical School
Keith A. Johnson
Keith A. Johnson Harvard University
Gad A. Marshall
Gad A. Marshall Brigham and Women's Hospital
Aaron P. Schultz
Aaron P. Schultz Harvard University
Kathryn V. Papp
Kathryn V. Papp Harvard University
Elizabeth C. Mormino
Elizabeth C. Mormino Stanford University
Jasmeer P. Chhatwal
Jasmeer P. Chhatwal Harvard University
Trey Hedden
Trey Hedden Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Heidi I.L. Jacobs
Heidi I.L. Jacobs Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens the door to a variety of educational pathways, particularly for those interested in counseling. Aspiring professionals now have access to flexible, accredited programs tailored for the online learner, making it easier to balance studies with personal and professional commitments.

For students seeking affordable options, there are a number of affordable online counseling master's programs in New York as well as affordable online counseling master's degrees in Pennsylvania. Those located closer to urban centers may benefit from affordable online counseling master's degrees in Philadelphia, which provide unique opportunities for networking and community-based experience.

On a national scale, students can consider the cheapest online counseling master's degrees in USA to minimize financial barriers. These programs pave the way for varied career paths, such as school counseling, clinical counseling, or specialized therapy roles. With flexible online degrees, the journey to a fulfilling career in psychology is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca Amariglio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles